Impact of surgical timing on chronic subdural hematoma outcomes: novel insights from a multicenter study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1007/s10143-025-03502-4
Stefano Colonna, Enrico Lo Bue, Alessandro Pesaresi, Lorenzo Dolci, Andrea Gatto, Luca Ceroni, Alessandro Pesce, Maurizio Salvati, Daniele Armocida, Alessandro Frati, Antonio Santoro, Alice Mistretta, Diego Garbossa, Fabio Cofano
{"title":"Impact of surgical timing on chronic subdural hematoma outcomes: novel insights from a multicenter study.","authors":"Stefano Colonna, Enrico Lo Bue, Alessandro Pesaresi, Lorenzo Dolci, Andrea Gatto, Luca Ceroni, Alessandro Pesce, Maurizio Salvati, Daniele Armocida, Alessandro Frati, Antonio Santoro, Alice Mistretta, Diego Garbossa, Fabio Cofano","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03502-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most frequently encountered conditions in the neurosurgical practice. The role of timing in CSDH surgery in mild symptomatic patients remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic role of surgical timing in patients with mild symptomatic CSDH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective study, patients diagnosed with mild symptomatic CSDH who underwent surgical evacuation were enrolled. Marwalder Grading System (MGS) and GCS scores were used for neurological evaluation. Patients presenting with preoperative GCS score ≥ 13 and MGS score ≤ 2 scores were defined as \"mild symptomatic\". A ROC curve analysis was used to identify the optimal surgical timing associated with favorable postoperative outcome. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to verify the association between surgical timing and postoperative neurological outcome, length of hospitalization, and postoperative complication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 160 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean latency from hospital admission to surgical intervention was 2.5 ± 3.2 days. All patients treated with surgical evacuation demonstrated postoperative clinical improvement in terms of GCS and/or MGS scores. The univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated significantly better neurological outcomes and shorter length of hospitalization in patients treated within 3 days from hospital admission. No statistically significant associations were demonstrated between surgical timing and postoperative complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to identify a specific surgical timing cut-off in the treatment of mildly symptomatic CSDH associated with improved clinical outcomes and recovery, offering a potential reference point for clinical decision-making. Patients who underwent surgery within three days from hospital admission exhibited significantly better postoperative neurological outcomes and shorter hospital stays. Surgical timing did not influence postoperative complications, including hematoma recurrence or the need for early reintervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03502-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most frequently encountered conditions in the neurosurgical practice. The role of timing in CSDH surgery in mild symptomatic patients remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic role of surgical timing in patients with mild symptomatic CSDH.

Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, patients diagnosed with mild symptomatic CSDH who underwent surgical evacuation were enrolled. Marwalder Grading System (MGS) and GCS scores were used for neurological evaluation. Patients presenting with preoperative GCS score ≥ 13 and MGS score ≤ 2 scores were defined as "mild symptomatic". A ROC curve analysis was used to identify the optimal surgical timing associated with favorable postoperative outcome. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to verify the association between surgical timing and postoperative neurological outcome, length of hospitalization, and postoperative complication.

Results: A total of 160 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean latency from hospital admission to surgical intervention was 2.5 ± 3.2 days. All patients treated with surgical evacuation demonstrated postoperative clinical improvement in terms of GCS and/or MGS scores. The univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated significantly better neurological outcomes and shorter length of hospitalization in patients treated within 3 days from hospital admission. No statistically significant associations were demonstrated between surgical timing and postoperative complication.

Conclusions: This is the first study to identify a specific surgical timing cut-off in the treatment of mildly symptomatic CSDH associated with improved clinical outcomes and recovery, offering a potential reference point for clinical decision-making. Patients who underwent surgery within three days from hospital admission exhibited significantly better postoperative neurological outcomes and shorter hospital stays. Surgical timing did not influence postoperative complications, including hematoma recurrence or the need for early reintervention.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术时机对慢性硬膜下血肿预后的影响:一项多中心研究的新见解。
目的:慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)是神经外科实践中最常见的疾病之一。时间在轻度症状患者的CSDH手术中的作用仍不确定。本研究的目的是分析轻度症状性CSDH患者手术时机的预后作用。方法:在这项多中心回顾性研究中,入选了诊断为轻度症状的CSDH并进行了手术疏散的患者。使用Marwalder评分系统(MGS)和GCS评分进行神经学评估。术前GCS评分≥13分,MGS评分≤2分的患者定义为“症状轻微”。ROC曲线分析用于确定与良好的术后预后相关的最佳手术时机。采用单因素和多因素分析来验证手术时机与术后神经预后、住院时间和术后并发症之间的关系。结果:共有160例患者入组研究。从入院到手术干预的平均潜伏期为2.5±3.2天。所有接受手术疏散治疗的患者在GCS和/或MGS评分方面均表现出术后临床改善。单因素和多因素分析显示,入院后3天内治疗的患者神经系统预后明显改善,住院时间明显缩短。手术时间与术后并发症之间无统计学意义的关联。结论:该研究首次确定了轻度症状CSDH治疗中与改善临床结果和康复相关的特定手术时间截止点,为临床决策提供了潜在的参考点。在入院后三天内接受手术的患者表现出明显更好的术后神经预后和更短的住院时间。手术时机不影响术后并发症,包括血肿复发或早期再干预的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Microsurgical clipping versus endovascular therapy for distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: A meta-analysis of double-armed comparative studies. Prevalence of os odontoideum: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression with implications for vertebral artery and osseous anomalies. Comparison of two novel options for resuspension of inverted U-shaped nasopharyngeal flap following endonasal access to cranio-vertebral junction: Pilot cadaveric analysis and illustrative case report. Barriers to care in epilepsy surgery clinics in Latin America: a systematic review of social-economic impact. Brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) during pregnancy: An Italian survey and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1