Examining frailty phenotypes of community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan using the falls risk for older people in the community - Taiwan version (Tw-FROP-Com).

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY Aging-Us Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.18632/aging.206231
Ya-Mei Tzeng, Senyeong Kao, Wun-Sin Chen, Shueh-Fen Chen, Shan-Ru Li, Yu-Lung Chiu, Yu-Tien Chang, Yaw-Wen Chang
{"title":"Examining frailty phenotypes of community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan using the falls risk for older people in the community - Taiwan version (Tw-FROP-Com).","authors":"Ya-Mei Tzeng, Senyeong Kao, Wun-Sin Chen, Shueh-Fen Chen, Shan-Ru Li, Yu-Lung Chiu, Yu-Tien Chang, Yaw-Wen Chang","doi":"10.18632/aging.206231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Falls are the second leading cause of accidental injury-related deaths among Taiwanese adults aged 65 and older. This study examined the association between Fried frailty phenotypes and fall risk in this population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in Keelung City with 375 participants from an Elderly Fall Prevention Program. Frailty was assessed using the modified Fried criteria: weakness, slowness, exhaustion, low physical activity, and unintentional weight loss. Participants with 0-2 criteria were classified as non-frail, and those with 3 or more as frail. Fall risk was evaluated using the Taiwan version of the Falls Risk for Older People in the Community (Tw-FROP-Com), a 28-item tool scoring 0-60 across 13 risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants had a mean age of 75.4 ± 6.8 years; 76.0% were female, 18.7% were frail, and 32.7% had fallen in the past year. Those with a fall history had higher rates of weakness (56.7%), slowness (49.6%), and frailty (26.1%). Regression analysis showed that weakness (β = 0.64), slowness (β = 0.21), exhaustion (β = 1.28), unintentional weight loss (β = 3.99), and low physical activity (β = 0.88) were significantly associated with increased fall risk. Frailty explained over 50% of fall risk variance, with unintentional weight loss as the strongest predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unintentional weight loss is the most significant predictor of fall risk among frailty traits. Individual frailty components better predict fall risk than composite frailty measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":55547,"journal":{"name":"Aging-Us","volume":"17 ","pages":"1011-1025"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12074817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging-Us","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.206231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Falls are the second leading cause of accidental injury-related deaths among Taiwanese adults aged 65 and older. This study examined the association between Fried frailty phenotypes and fall risk in this population.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Keelung City with 375 participants from an Elderly Fall Prevention Program. Frailty was assessed using the modified Fried criteria: weakness, slowness, exhaustion, low physical activity, and unintentional weight loss. Participants with 0-2 criteria were classified as non-frail, and those with 3 or more as frail. Fall risk was evaluated using the Taiwan version of the Falls Risk for Older People in the Community (Tw-FROP-Com), a 28-item tool scoring 0-60 across 13 risk factors.

Results: Participants had a mean age of 75.4 ± 6.8 years; 76.0% were female, 18.7% were frail, and 32.7% had fallen in the past year. Those with a fall history had higher rates of weakness (56.7%), slowness (49.6%), and frailty (26.1%). Regression analysis showed that weakness (β = 0.64), slowness (β = 0.21), exhaustion (β = 1.28), unintentional weight loss (β = 3.99), and low physical activity (β = 0.88) were significantly associated with increased fall risk. Frailty explained over 50% of fall risk variance, with unintentional weight loss as the strongest predictor.

Conclusion: Unintentional weight loss is the most significant predictor of fall risk among frailty traits. Individual frailty components better predict fall risk than composite frailty measures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用社区老年人跌倒风险研究台湾社区居住老年人的脆弱表型(two - frop - com)
背景介绍在 65 岁及以上的台湾成年人中,跌倒是导致意外伤害相关死亡的第二大原因。本研究探讨了弗里德虚弱表型与该人群跌倒风险之间的关系:在基隆市进行了一项横断面研究,375 名参与者参加了老年人跌倒预防计划。评估虚弱程度的标准是修改后的弗里德标准:虚弱、迟钝、疲惫、体力活动少和无意中体重减轻。符合 0-2 项标准的参与者被归类为非虚弱,符合 3 项或更多标准的参与者被归类为虚弱。跌倒风险采用台湾版《社区老年人跌倒风险》(Tw-FROP-Com)进行评估,该工具包含 28 个项目,对 13 个风险因素进行 0-60 分评分:参与者的平均年龄为 75.4 ± 6.8 岁,76.0% 为女性,18.7% 为体弱者,32.7% 在过去一年中摔倒过。有跌倒史的人中,虚弱(56.7%)、行动迟缓(49.6%)和虚弱(26.1%)的比例较高。回归分析表明,虚弱(β = 0.64)、行动迟缓(β = 0.21)、疲惫(β = 1.28)、意外体重减轻(β = 3.99)和体力活动少(β = 0.88)与跌倒风险增加有显著相关性。虚弱解释了超过50%的跌倒风险变异,而无意的体重减轻是最强的预测因素:结论:在各种虚弱特征中,无意的体重减轻是预测跌倒风险的最重要因素。单个虚弱特征比综合虚弱特征更能预测跌倒风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aging-Us
Aging-Us CELL BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
595
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Correction for: Combined identification of ARID1A, CSMD1, and SENP3 as effective prognostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Retraction of: Esophageal carcinoma cell-excreted exosomal uc.189 promotes lymphatic metastasis. Aging as a multifactorial disorder with two stages. Age-specific DNA methylation alterations in sperm at imprint control regions may contribute to the risk of autism spectrum disorder in offspring. Cellular senescence meets infection: highlights from the 10th annual International Cell Senescence Association (ICSA) conference, Rome 2025.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1