Heterogeneous effects of obesity on all-cause mortality: A causal forest analysis of hospitalized patients in China

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1111/dom.16391
Menghui Liu MD, Zemeihong Xu MBBS, Lixiang He MD, Xingfeng Xu MD, Xiaojie Cai MD, Yue Guo MD, Shaozhao Zhang MD, Xinghao Xu MD, Zhenyu Xiong MD, Xiaodong Zhuang PhD, Xinxue Liao PhD
{"title":"Heterogeneous effects of obesity on all-cause mortality: A causal forest analysis of hospitalized patients in China","authors":"Menghui Liu MD,&nbsp;Zemeihong Xu MBBS,&nbsp;Lixiang He MD,&nbsp;Xingfeng Xu MD,&nbsp;Xiaojie Cai MD,&nbsp;Yue Guo MD,&nbsp;Shaozhao Zhang MD,&nbsp;Xinghao Xu MD,&nbsp;Zhenyu Xiong MD,&nbsp;Xiaodong Zhuang PhD,&nbsp;Xinxue Liao PhD","doi":"10.1111/dom.16391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To confirm the ‘obesity paradox’ in hospitalized populations and examine the heterogeneous effects of obesity on all-cause mortality risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We included 5967 hospitalized patients from the Real-world Data of Cardiometabolic Protection (RED-CARPET) study (ChiCTR2000039901) in China. After 1:1 k-nearest neighbours matching, a causal forest model classified the population into four subgroups. Cox models were used to assess the association between obesity and all-cause mortality, with external validation in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During a median follow-up of 63.8 months, 919 (15.4%) deaths occurred. A U-shaped association between body mass index (BMI) and all-cause mortality was observed, illustrating the ‘obesity paradox’, with the highest mortality rate (18.5%) observed in the normal weight group. Furthermore, 911 participants with obesity and 911 participants with normal weight, matched for homogeneity, were categorized into four subgroups using the causal forest model. In subgroup 3 (with good renal function, well-controlled blood glucose and favourable nutritional status), patients with obesity had a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to those with normal weight (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.06–4.22; <i>p</i> = 0.033). No significant association was observed in the other subgroups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Similar results were verified in the ARIC study cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The association between obesity and all-cause mortality is heterogeneous, as individuals with good renal function, well-controlled blood glucose and favourable nutritional status may experience a higher mortality risk. These findings emphasize the need for personalized management strategies in clinical practice to address the varying effects of obesity across different health conditions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":"27 7","pages":"3695-3704"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://dom-pubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.16391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To confirm the ‘obesity paradox’ in hospitalized populations and examine the heterogeneous effects of obesity on all-cause mortality risk.

Materials and Methods

We included 5967 hospitalized patients from the Real-world Data of Cardiometabolic Protection (RED-CARPET) study (ChiCTR2000039901) in China. After 1:1 k-nearest neighbours matching, a causal forest model classified the population into four subgroups. Cox models were used to assess the association between obesity and all-cause mortality, with external validation in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort.

Results

During a median follow-up of 63.8 months, 919 (15.4%) deaths occurred. A U-shaped association between body mass index (BMI) and all-cause mortality was observed, illustrating the ‘obesity paradox’, with the highest mortality rate (18.5%) observed in the normal weight group. Furthermore, 911 participants with obesity and 911 participants with normal weight, matched for homogeneity, were categorized into four subgroups using the causal forest model. In subgroup 3 (with good renal function, well-controlled blood glucose and favourable nutritional status), patients with obesity had a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to those with normal weight (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.06–4.22; p = 0.033). No significant association was observed in the other subgroups (p > 0.05). Similar results were verified in the ARIC study cohort.

Conclusions

The association between obesity and all-cause mortality is heterogeneous, as individuals with good renal function, well-controlled blood glucose and favourable nutritional status may experience a higher mortality risk. These findings emphasize the need for personalized management strategies in clinical practice to address the varying effects of obesity across different health conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥胖对全因死亡率的异质性影响:中国住院患者的因果森林分析
目的:确认住院人群中的“肥胖悖论”,并检查肥胖对全因死亡风险的异质性影响。材料和方法:我们纳入了来自中国心脏代谢保护真实世界数据(RED-CARPET)研究(ChiCTR2000039901)的5967名住院患者。经过1:1的k近邻匹配,因果森林模型将种群划分为四个亚群。Cox模型用于评估肥胖与全因死亡率之间的关系,并在社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)队列中进行了外部验证。结果:在中位随访63.8个月期间,发生919例(15.4%)死亡。在体重指数(BMI)和全因死亡率之间观察到u型关系,说明了“肥胖悖论”,在正常体重组观察到的死亡率最高(18.5%)。此外,使用因果森林模型将911名肥胖和911名正常体重的参与者按同质性进行匹配,分为四个亚组。在亚组3(肾功能良好,血糖控制良好,营养状况良好)中,肥胖患者的全因死亡率高于体重正常的患者(HR, 2.12;95% ci, 1.06-4.22;p = 0.033)。其他亚组间无显著相关性(p < 0.05)。在ARIC研究队列中也证实了类似的结果。结论:肥胖与全因死亡率之间的关系是不均匀的,因为肾功能良好、血糖控制良好和营养状况良好的个体可能会有更高的死亡风险。这些发现强调了在临床实践中需要个性化的管理策略,以解决肥胖在不同健康状况下的不同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
期刊最新文献
GLP-1RA and the risk of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A population-based study. Diabetes management in maternally inherited diabetes and deafness (MIDD): A review and a proposed treatment algorithm. Synergistic associations of metformin and GLP-1 receptor agonist use with adiposity-related cancer incidence in people living with type 2 diabetes. Impact of sotagliflozin on glomerular hyperfiltration in people with type 1 diabetes: A post hoc analysis of the inTandem3 trial. Pharmacological intervention: Challenges and promising outcomes for fat loss and preservation of lean body mass in the treatment of overweight and type 2 diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1