Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Aesthetic Surgery Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1093/asj/sjaf050
Özgür Kemal, Emel Tahir, Ozan Çolak, Mustafa Aktaş
{"title":"Radiological and Anatomical Parameters as Determinants of Success in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty.","authors":"Özgür Kemal, Emel Tahir, Ozan Çolak, Mustafa Aktaş","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rhinoplasty is a common cosmetic and functional procedure that aims to enhance nasal aesthetics and airway function. Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) is increasingly favored for its ability to preserve the natural anatomy of the nose while minimizing complications. This study sought to identify ideal candidates for DPR by analyzing anatomical parameters that affect surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of patients for dorsal preservation surgery through preoperative radiological measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in the otorhinolaryngology department of a tertiary hospital, involving 43 patients undergoing high-strip dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Preoperative and intraoperative CT scans were performed to assess nasal anatomy, focusing on features like nasal bone length, radix root to nasal tip distance, and the kyphion angle. The overall surgical success (OSS) score was utilized to measure outcomes, calculated by subtracting complications, reoperations, and hospitalizations from a base score of 10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 43 patients (6 males, 37 females), with a mean age of 26.4. Intraoperative data revealed that 55.8% required hump rasping and 27.9% had residual humps at 6 months. Positive correlation was found between longer radix root to nasal bone tip distances and lower OSS scores (r = 0.31, P = .043). Shorter nasal bones were associated with higher OSS scores (r = -0.45, P = .002), and larger kyphion angles correlated with lower success rates (r = -0.30, P = .049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shorter nasal bones and lower kyphion angles are associated with better outcomes in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Tailoring surgical techniques to individual anatomical features can improve both aesthetic and functional results, enhancing patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3 (therapeutic): </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"761-769"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rhinoplasty is a common cosmetic and functional procedure that aims to enhance nasal aesthetics and airway function. Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty (DPR) is increasingly favored for its ability to preserve the natural anatomy of the nose while minimizing complications. This study sought to identify ideal candidates for DPR by analyzing anatomical parameters that affect surgical outcomes.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of patients for dorsal preservation surgery through preoperative radiological measurements.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the otorhinolaryngology department of a tertiary hospital, involving 43 patients undergoing high-strip dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Preoperative and intraoperative CT scans were performed to assess nasal anatomy, focusing on features like nasal bone length, radix root to nasal tip distance, and the kyphion angle. The overall surgical success (OSS) score was utilized to measure outcomes, calculated by subtracting complications, reoperations, and hospitalizations from a base score of 10.

Results: The cohort included 43 patients (6 males, 37 females), with a mean age of 26.4. Intraoperative data revealed that 55.8% required hump rasping and 27.9% had residual humps at 6 months. Positive correlation was found between longer radix root to nasal bone tip distances and lower OSS scores (r = 0.31, P = .043). Shorter nasal bones were associated with higher OSS scores (r = -0.45, P = .002), and larger kyphion angles correlated with lower success rates (r = -0.30, P = .049).

Conclusions: Shorter nasal bones and lower kyphion angles are associated with better outcomes in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Tailoring surgical techniques to individual anatomical features can improve both aesthetic and functional results, enhancing patient satisfaction.

Level of evidence: 3 (therapeutic):

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射学和解剖学参数作为背部保存鼻成形术成功的决定因素。
背景:鼻整形术是一种常见的美容和功能性手术,旨在提高鼻部美观和气道功能。保留鼻背的鼻整形术能够保留鼻部的自然解剖结构,同时将并发症降至最低,因此越来越受到青睐。本研究旨在通过分析影响手术效果的解剖学参数,确定理想的 DPR 候选人:本研究旨在通过术前放射学测量确定患者是否适合接受鼻背保留手术:方法:在一家三甲医院的耳鼻喉科开展了一项前瞻性观察研究,共有 43 名患者接受了高带保留鼻背成形术。术前和术中 CT 扫描用于评估鼻部解剖结构,重点是鼻骨长度、桡骨根到鼻尖的距离和 Kyphion 角等特征。采用总体手术成功率评分来衡量结果,计算方法是从 10 分的基础分中减去并发症、再次手术和住院治疗:术中数据显示,55.8% 的患者需要进行驼峰磨削术,27.9% 的患者在 6 个月后仍有驼峰残留。桡骨根部到鼻骨顶端的距离较长与 OSS 评分较低呈正相关(r=0.31,p=0.043)。鼻骨较短与OSS评分较高相关(r=-0.45,p=0.002),而Kyphion角度较大与成功率较低相关(r=-0.30,p=0.049):结论:较短的鼻骨和较小的Kyphion角与鼻背保留隆鼻术的较佳效果相关。结论:鼻骨较短和Kyphion角度较低与鼻背保留隆鼻术的较佳疗效有关。根据个体解剖特征调整手术技术可改善美学和功能效果,提高患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
期刊最新文献
Ozempification of Aesthetics: Why Plastic Surgeons Must Lead the GLP-1 Era. Comparison of Patient Reviews for Submental Liposuction and Kybella Using Deep Learning and Natural Language Processing: Is There a Superior Intervention for Submental Adiposity? Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based Longitudinal Analysis of Facial Skeletal Aging. Neck Lift After Nonsurgical Treatments: Fibrosis, Fat Loss, and Surgical Complexity. Laser Resurfacing at the Time of Facelift Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1