Effect of preoperative Silodosin on facilitating access sheath placement in retrograde intrarenal surgery. A randomized controlled studys.

IF 1.2 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Arab Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20905998.2024.2414134
Ahmed Higazy, Mohamed Samir, Ahmed AbdelGhani, A M Tawfeek, Ahmed Radwan
{"title":"Effect of preoperative Silodosin on facilitating access sheath placement in retrograde intrarenal surgery. A randomized controlled studys.","authors":"Ahmed Higazy, Mohamed Samir, Ahmed AbdelGhani, A M Tawfeek, Ahmed Radwan","doi":"10.1080/20905998.2024.2414134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>to evaluate the effect of preoperative Silodosin on ureteric dilatation to facilitate ureteral access sheath (UAS) placement and reduction of ureteral wall injury in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>one hundred and twenty patients with renal or ureteric stones were randomly allocated into 2 equal groups. Group A represents patients who received a 7-day preoperative single dose Silodosin before RIRS while Group B represents patients who received a placebo for the same regimen. Our primary outcome was to assess the success rate of (UAS) placement. Our secondary outcomes were to evaluate the perioperative complication rate, stone-free rate, hospital stay, and cost analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, Silodosin showed a higher success rate for (UAS) insertion compared to placebo with a statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.04). Spontaneous UAS insertion in the Silodosin group was 58.3%, which was increased with active ureteric dilatation to 98.3%. Preoperative Silodosin led to less postoperative pain and analgesics requirements without impacting postoperative hospital stay or stone-free rate. There was less ureteric injury incidence in the Silodosin group compared to placebo with a statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative Silodosin facilitates UAS insertion with a protective role against ureteric injury compared to placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":"23 2","pages":"117-123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20905998.2024.2414134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: to evaluate the effect of preoperative Silodosin on ureteric dilatation to facilitate ureteral access sheath (UAS) placement and reduction of ureteral wall injury in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

Methods: one hundred and twenty patients with renal or ureteric stones were randomly allocated into 2 equal groups. Group A represents patients who received a 7-day preoperative single dose Silodosin before RIRS while Group B represents patients who received a placebo for the same regimen. Our primary outcome was to assess the success rate of (UAS) placement. Our secondary outcomes were to evaluate the perioperative complication rate, stone-free rate, hospital stay, and cost analysis.

Results: In our study, Silodosin showed a higher success rate for (UAS) insertion compared to placebo with a statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.04). Spontaneous UAS insertion in the Silodosin group was 58.3%, which was increased with active ureteric dilatation to 98.3%. Preoperative Silodosin led to less postoperative pain and analgesics requirements without impacting postoperative hospital stay or stone-free rate. There was less ureteric injury incidence in the Silodosin group compared to placebo with a statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.002).

Conclusion: Preoperative Silodosin facilitates UAS insertion with a protective role against ureteric injury compared to placebo.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前服用西洛多辛对逆行肾内手术入路鞘置入的促进作用。随机对照研究
简介:目的:评估在逆行肾内手术(RIRS)中,术前服用西洛多辛对输尿管扩张以促进输尿管通道鞘(UAS)置入和减少输尿管壁损伤的影响。方法:将120名肾结石或输尿管结石患者随机分配到两个相同的组别。A 组代表在逆行肾内手术前接受为期 7 天的术前单剂西洛多辛治疗的患者,而 B 组代表接受安慰剂治疗的患者。我们的主要结果是评估(UAS)置入的成功率。我们的次要结果是评估围手术期并发症发生率、无结石率、住院时间和成本分析:在我们的研究中,与安慰剂相比,西洛多辛显示出更高的(UAS)置入成功率,差异有统计学意义(p 值 = 0.04)。西洛多辛组的 UAS 自发插入率为 58.3%,随着输尿管的积极扩张,这一比例上升到 98.3%。术前服用西洛多辛减少了术后疼痛和镇痛药的需求,但不影响术后住院时间或无结石率。西洛多辛组的输尿管损伤发生率低于安慰剂组,差异有统计学意义(P值=0.002):结论:与安慰剂相比,西洛多辛有助于术前插入 UAS,对输尿管损伤具有保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Urology
Arab Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.
期刊最新文献
A response to Nasrallah et al. "Infection rates of trans-perineal versus trans-rectal prostate biopsy: A Middle Eastern tertiary center experience-Time for a change?" Interventions to decrease pain and anxiety in patients undergoing urodynamic study: Is there any clear evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis. An in vitro study evaluating the internal pressure during RIRS of suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath. Effect of vardenafil in long-standing diabetic patients comparing different doses regarding erectile dysfunction, testosterone level and partner satisfaction. Efficacy and safety of low-intensity shockwave therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms in non-prostatic condition: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1