Increasing evidence-based care practices for patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia through required infectious diseases consultation in a tertiary care hospital: a quality improvement initiative.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003243
Arunima Soma Dalai, Emma B Monti, Raghad Mallesho, Michael Obeda, Gerald A Evans, Santiago Perez-Patrigeon, Evan Wilson, Jorge L Martinez-Cajas, Prameet M Sheth, Lewis Tomalty, Heather Wise, Kiarah Shchepanik, Amelia Wilkinson, Geneviève C Digby, Anthony D Bai
{"title":"Increasing evidence-based care practices for patients with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia through required infectious diseases consultation in a tertiary care hospital: a quality improvement initiative.","authors":"Arunima Soma Dalai, Emma B Monti, Raghad Mallesho, Michael Obeda, Gerald A Evans, Santiago Perez-Patrigeon, Evan Wilson, Jorge L Martinez-Cajas, Prameet M Sheth, Lewis Tomalty, Heather Wise, Kiarah Shchepanik, Amelia Wilkinson, Geneviève C Digby, Anthony D Bai","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> bacteraemia had a higher mortality rate than average at Kingston Health Sciences Centre (KHSC). Infectious diseases specialist consultation has been shown to improve outcomes for <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia by increasing adherence to evidence-based care practices. Yet, infectious disease specialists were not involved in many cases at KHSC.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To improve adherence to evidence-based care practices by increasing the proportion of patients with <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia who receive a formal infectious diseases consultation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A multimodal intervention consisting of (1) daily automated email of positive blood culture results to the infectious diseases team; (2) standardisation of prompts attached to positive blood culture results on the electronic medical record; (3) policy of mandatory infectious diseases consultation and (4) education of resident physicians.</p><p><strong>Implementation and evaluation: </strong>The outcome measure was adherence to evidence-based care practices, defined as echocardiography, repeating blood cultures and treatment with a first-line antibiotic. A secondary outcome measure was 90-day mortality. The process measure was the proportion of patients receiving formal infectious diseases consultation. A balancing measure was hospital length of stay. All measures were monitored semimonthly using statistical process control charts for time periods before and after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 171 and 186 patients with <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia in the preintervention and postintervention period, respectively. Between these two periods, the proportion of those who received evidence-based care practices increased from 73% to 82% (p=0.031) and demonstrated special cause variation. Mortality changed from 29% to 24% (p=0.400). The proportion of patients receiving an infectious diseases consultation increased from 47% to 90% (p<0.001) and demonstrated special cause variation. The median (IQR) length of stay was 18 (11-30) days and 17 (11-42) days in the preintervention and postintervention period, respectively (p=0.442).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multimodal intervention that implemented mandatory infectious diseases consultation significantly improved evidence-based care practices for <i>S. aureus</i> bacteraemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia had a higher mortality rate than average at Kingston Health Sciences Centre (KHSC). Infectious diseases specialist consultation has been shown to improve outcomes for S. aureus bacteraemia by increasing adherence to evidence-based care practices. Yet, infectious disease specialists were not involved in many cases at KHSC.

Aim: To improve adherence to evidence-based care practices by increasing the proportion of patients with S. aureus bacteraemia who receive a formal infectious diseases consultation.

Interventions: A multimodal intervention consisting of (1) daily automated email of positive blood culture results to the infectious diseases team; (2) standardisation of prompts attached to positive blood culture results on the electronic medical record; (3) policy of mandatory infectious diseases consultation and (4) education of resident physicians.

Implementation and evaluation: The outcome measure was adherence to evidence-based care practices, defined as echocardiography, repeating blood cultures and treatment with a first-line antibiotic. A secondary outcome measure was 90-day mortality. The process measure was the proportion of patients receiving formal infectious diseases consultation. A balancing measure was hospital length of stay. All measures were monitored semimonthly using statistical process control charts for time periods before and after intervention.

Results: There were 171 and 186 patients with S. aureus bacteraemia in the preintervention and postintervention period, respectively. Between these two periods, the proportion of those who received evidence-based care practices increased from 73% to 82% (p=0.031) and demonstrated special cause variation. Mortality changed from 29% to 24% (p=0.400). The proportion of patients receiving an infectious diseases consultation increased from 47% to 90% (p<0.001) and demonstrated special cause variation. The median (IQR) length of stay was 18 (11-30) days and 17 (11-42) days in the preintervention and postintervention period, respectively (p=0.442).

Conclusions: A multimodal intervention that implemented mandatory infectious diseases consultation significantly improved evidence-based care practices for S. aureus bacteraemia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过在三级保健医院进行感染性疾病咨询,增加对金黄色葡萄球菌血症患者的循证护理实践:一项质量改进倡议。
背景:在金斯敦健康科学中心(KHSC),金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的死亡率高于平均水平。传染病专家会诊可提高循证护理实践的依从性,从而改善金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的治疗效果。目的:提高金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者接受正规传染病会诊的比例,从而改善循证护理实践:干预措施:一种多模式干预措施,包括(1)每天自动向传染病小组发送血培养阳性结果的电子邮件;(2)规范电子病历中血培养阳性结果的提示;(3)强制传染病会诊政策;(4)对住院医生进行教育:结果衡量标准是对循证护理实践的遵守情况,即超声心动图检查、重复血液培养和一线抗生素治疗。次要结果指标是 90 天死亡率。过程测量指标是接受正规传染病咨询的患者比例。平衡指标是住院时间。使用统计过程控制图每半月对干预前后的时间段进行监测:干预前和干预后分别有 171 名和 186 名金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者。在这两个时间段内,接受循证护理措施的患者比例从 73% 上升至 82%(P=0.031),并显示出特殊原因的变化。死亡率从 29% 降至 24%(P=0.400)。接受传染病咨询的患者比例从 47% 增加到 90%(P=0.031):实施强制传染病会诊的多模式干预显著改善了金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的循证护理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enhancing hand hygiene compliance to reduce healthcare-associated infections in a coronary care unit: a quality improvement initiative in a tertiary hospital in South India. Scalable treatment algorithm focused on hypertension management for the University of California. Improving GIRFT compliance and patient experience of accessibility and shared decision making for elective hip and knee replacement: incorporation of a digital patient information leaflet. Improved pain management after tonsil surgery in adults: a quality improvement programme. Impact of establishing a comprehensive tobacco cessation service at a primary healthcare setting in the quit attempts: a quality improvement project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1