Letter to the editor regarding "effect of buttress plate in herscovici type D vertical medial malleolar fractures and peripheral fractures: a retrospective comparative cohort study".

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1186/s13018-025-05593-7
Malik Çelik, Emre Baca
{"title":"Letter to the editor regarding \"effect of buttress plate in herscovici type D vertical medial malleolar fractures and peripheral fractures: a retrospective comparative cohort study\".","authors":"Malik Çelik, Emre Baca","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05593-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this letter to the editor, we highlight several concerns that may affect the validity of the study results by Luo et al. entitled \"Effect of Buttres plate in Herscovici type D vertical medial malleolar fractures and peripheral fractures: a retrospective comparative cohort study.\" First, we point out a methodological flaw in the selection of treatment groups, as insufficient standardization of criteria potentially led to selection bias. Second, we note that the angle of the screws in vertical fractures differed from the standard recommended in the literature, which may affect the effectiveness of fixation. Studies in the literature have increased the validity of their comparisons by using more reliable screw alignment techniques. They also recommend plate fixation instead of screws for vertical fractures, supporting the idea that plates provide more stable fixation in these cases. The inappropriate placement of screws in the Luo et al. study may therefore bias the results in favor of plate fixation and reduce the validity of the comparison between treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05593-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this letter to the editor, we highlight several concerns that may affect the validity of the study results by Luo et al. entitled "Effect of Buttres plate in Herscovici type D vertical medial malleolar fractures and peripheral fractures: a retrospective comparative cohort study." First, we point out a methodological flaw in the selection of treatment groups, as insufficient standardization of criteria potentially led to selection bias. Second, we note that the angle of the screws in vertical fractures differed from the standard recommended in the literature, which may affect the effectiveness of fixation. Studies in the literature have increased the validity of their comparisons by using more reliable screw alignment techniques. They also recommend plate fixation instead of screws for vertical fractures, supporting the idea that plates provide more stable fixation in these cases. The inappropriate placement of screws in the Luo et al. study may therefore bias the results in favor of plate fixation and reduce the validity of the comparison between treatment modalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于“支撑钢板在herscovici D型垂直内踝骨折和外周骨折中的作用:一项回顾性比较队列研究”的致编辑的信。
在这封致编辑的信中,我们强调了可能影响Luo等人题为“Buttres钢板在Herscovici型D型垂直内踝骨折和外周骨折中的作用:一项回顾性比较队列研究”的研究结果有效性的几个问题。首先,我们指出了治疗组选择方法上的缺陷,因为标准的不充分标准化可能导致选择偏差。其次,我们注意到垂直骨折中螺钉的角度与文献中推荐的标准不同,这可能会影响固定的有效性。文献中的研究通过使用更可靠的螺钉对准技术增加了他们比较的有效性。他们还建议用钢板固定代替螺钉治疗垂直骨折,这支持了钢板在这些病例中提供更稳定的固定的观点。因此,在Luo等人的研究中,螺钉放置不当可能会使结果偏向于钢板固定,并降低治疗方式比较的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Association between baseline lipid levels and re-fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective cohort study. Efficacy and safety of combined supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block and sacral plexus block versus spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Impact of flexion contracture severity on early outcomes of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study. A comparative study of the clinical value of PRP and microfracture techniques in the repair of rotator cuff injuries. Clinical study on the reduction of perioperative blood loss in primary total hip arthroplasty by local application of hemocoagulase bothrops atrox for injection: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1