A systematic review of performance-based functional capacity measures for use in Huntington's disease and evaluation of their suitability for clinical trials.

Abstract

BackgroundHuntington's disease (HD) leads to a decline in functional capacity, affecting daily life tasks. Assessing functional capacity in clinical trials is crucial to evaluate treatment effectiveness and substantiate the clinical meaningfulness of more sensitive and reliable measures. Clinician rating scales are commonly used, but performance-based measures of functional capacity may offer advantages, however, there is no consensus on the suitability of existing performance-based measures for use in HD.ObjectiveWe applied a Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) approach to evaluate the potential suitability of performance-based functional capacity measures for HD clinical trials. We also used criteria developed with expert input to assess these measures.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of relevant databases and screened 1924 articles for inclusion criteria.ResultsWe included a total of 89 articles on 33 performance-based functional capacity measures. Measures were rated from Very Low to Moderate suitability for use in HD clinical trials. DriveSafe DriveAware and EcoKitchen were the only measures tested in HD participants and were rated as having Moderate and Very Low suitability respectively, highlighting the need for further evaluation. Additionally, the Brief University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (UCSD UPSA-B) and the Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT), were identified as potentially useful, also rated Moderate.ConclusionsMultiple performance-based functional capacity measures show potential for use in patients with HD, pending further investigation.