Interventions to Reduce Health Care Utilization for Non-English Language Preference Patients After Tonsillectomy.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1240
Meredith Lind, Kristyn Moss, Thomas Javens, Kris Jatana
{"title":"Interventions to Reduce Health Care Utilization for Non-English Language Preference Patients After Tonsillectomy.","authors":"Meredith Lind, Kristyn Moss, Thomas Javens, Kris Jatana","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compared with those of English language preference (ELP), patients of non-English language preference (NELP) are at increased risk of postoperative complications and health care utilization. A series of interventions were initiated to reduce utilization and improve post-tonsillectomy outcomes for NELP patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement (QI) study was performed at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Data collection began in 2019 and interventions, including improving translated postoperative education materials, pain medication tracking charts, direct access to interpreters, consistent tonsillectomy technique, and routine postoperative nurse phone call for education, were initiated by December 2020. Postintervention data were collected through July 2024. The primary outcome measured was return to the emergency department (ED) or urgent care (UC) with same-day discharge within 30 days post-tonsillectomy. Additional data collected included demographics, language spoken, reason for surgery, and reason for return.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2019 and July 2024, a total of 14,007 patients underwent tonsillectomy: 12,830 (91.6%) ELP and 1177 (8.4%) NELP. After interventions, there was a 70.2% reduction (7.73% in 2019 to 2.30% in 2024) in NELP patients who were seen and discharged same day. In 2019, NELP patients were seen significantly more often (P = .016). In 2023, there was not a statistically significant difference between the two groups (ELP = 1.28%; NELP = 2.30%, P = .55).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In our patient population, a set of thoughtful interventions for NELP patients/caregivers reduced minor, potentially unnecessary, nonoperative returns to the ED/UC.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Implementation may reduce complications, improve the postoperative experience for NELP patients, and reduce overall health care costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"278-287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Compared with those of English language preference (ELP), patients of non-English language preference (NELP) are at increased risk of postoperative complications and health care utilization. A series of interventions were initiated to reduce utilization and improve post-tonsillectomy outcomes for NELP patients.

Methods: This quality improvement (QI) study was performed at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Data collection began in 2019 and interventions, including improving translated postoperative education materials, pain medication tracking charts, direct access to interpreters, consistent tonsillectomy technique, and routine postoperative nurse phone call for education, were initiated by December 2020. Postintervention data were collected through July 2024. The primary outcome measured was return to the emergency department (ED) or urgent care (UC) with same-day discharge within 30 days post-tonsillectomy. Additional data collected included demographics, language spoken, reason for surgery, and reason for return.

Results: Between January 2019 and July 2024, a total of 14,007 patients underwent tonsillectomy: 12,830 (91.6%) ELP and 1177 (8.4%) NELP. After interventions, there was a 70.2% reduction (7.73% in 2019 to 2.30% in 2024) in NELP patients who were seen and discharged same day. In 2019, NELP patients were seen significantly more often (P = .016). In 2023, there was not a statistically significant difference between the two groups (ELP = 1.28%; NELP = 2.30%, P = .55).

Discussion: In our patient population, a set of thoughtful interventions for NELP patients/caregivers reduced minor, potentially unnecessary, nonoperative returns to the ED/UC.

Implications for practice: Implementation may reduce complications, improve the postoperative experience for NELP patients, and reduce overall health care costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干预措施减少扁桃体切除术后非英语语言偏好患者的医疗保健使用率。
目的:与英语语言偏好(ELP)患者相比,非英语语言偏好(NELP)患者术后并发症和医疗保健利用的风险更高。一系列的干预措施被启动,以减少使用和改善NELP患者扁桃体切除术后的结果。方法:本质量改进(QI)研究在一家三级儿科医院进行。2019年开始收集数据,并于2020年12月启动干预措施,包括改进翻译的术后教育材料、止痛药跟踪表、直接获得口译员、一致的扁桃体切除术技术和常规术后护士电话教育。干预后数据收集至2024年7月。测量的主要结局是扁桃体切除术后30天内返回急诊科(ED)或同一天出院的紧急护理(UC)。收集的其他数据包括人口统计、使用的语言、手术原因和返回原因。结果:2019年1月至2024年7月期间,共有14,007例患者接受了扁桃体切除术:12,830例(91.6%)ELP和1177例(8.4%)NELP。干预后,当天就诊和出院的NELP患者减少了70.2%(2019年为7.73%,2024年为2.30%)。2019年,NELP患者的出现频率显著增加(P = 0.016)。2023年,两组间差异无统计学意义(ELP = 1.28%;Nelp = 2.30%, p = 0.55)。讨论:在我们的患者群体中,针对NELP患者/护理人员的一套深思熟虑的干预措施减少了轻微的、潜在不必要的、非手术性的急诊科/急诊室的复发。对实践的启示:实施可以减少并发症,改善NELP患者的术后体验,并降低总体医疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
期刊最新文献
Radiofrequency Ablation as a Palliative Treatment for Advanced Primary Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Ineligible for Surgery. TI-RADS and Bethesda Classification System Correlate With Predicting Pediatric Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Comparing the 7th and 8th Editions of AJCC Staging System for Hypopharyngeal Cancer Undergoing Surgery. Patterns of Teprotumumab-Induced Hearing Dysfunction: A Systematic Review. Predictive Factors of Free Flap Volume Evolution in Head and Neck Reconstruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1