Long-term changes in skeletal and airway dimensions in patients treated with headgear compared with untreated control subjects

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.02.007
Ahmed I. Masoud, Salma H. Ghoneim
{"title":"Long-term changes in skeletal and airway dimensions in patients treated with headgear compared with untreated control subjects","authors":"Ahmed I. Masoud,&nbsp;Salma H. Ghoneim","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term and long-term skeletal and airway changes associated with the use of headgear and to compare these changes to a group of untreated control subjects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The sample included 2 Class II groups: a group treated with cervical headgear and a group of untreated control subjects, with 30 subjects in each group. Lateral cephalograms were taken at 3 time points: pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2), and long-term postretention (T3), and a single examiner performed skeletal and airway measurements. Paired samples <em>t</em> test was used to compare T1, T2, and T3 skeletal and airway measurements within the groups, and independent samples <em>t</em> test was used to compare treatment (T2 − T1), posttreatment (T3 − T2), and overall (T3 − T1) skeletal and airway changes in the treatment group compared with the control group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a significant decrease in the SNA (3.1°) and an increase in the SN-PP (1.5°) in the treatment group at T2 (<em>P</em> &lt;0.001), which remained significant at T3 (<em>P</em> &lt;0.05). In addition, there was a significant short-term increase in the mandibular plane angle and a decrease in SNB (<em>P</em> &lt;0.05). Paired <em>t</em> tests showed no significant change in airway width within the treatment group (<em>P</em> &gt;0.05). The independent samples <em>t</em> test showed no significant differences in any of the changes in airway variables between the groups (<em>P</em> &gt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The use of headgear did not result in any change in airway width, both short-term and long-term. A decrease in SNA and an increase in SN-PP were found with the use of the headgear, and these changes remained stable for up to 8 years posttreatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"168 1","pages":"Pages 63-74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540625000721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term and long-term skeletal and airway changes associated with the use of headgear and to compare these changes to a group of untreated control subjects.

Methods

The sample included 2 Class II groups: a group treated with cervical headgear and a group of untreated control subjects, with 30 subjects in each group. Lateral cephalograms were taken at 3 time points: pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2), and long-term postretention (T3), and a single examiner performed skeletal and airway measurements. Paired samples t test was used to compare T1, T2, and T3 skeletal and airway measurements within the groups, and independent samples t test was used to compare treatment (T2 − T1), posttreatment (T3 − T2), and overall (T3 − T1) skeletal and airway changes in the treatment group compared with the control group.

Results

There was a significant decrease in the SNA (3.1°) and an increase in the SN-PP (1.5°) in the treatment group at T2 (P <0.001), which remained significant at T3 (P <0.05). In addition, there was a significant short-term increase in the mandibular plane angle and a decrease in SNB (P <0.05). Paired t tests showed no significant change in airway width within the treatment group (P >0.05). The independent samples t test showed no significant differences in any of the changes in airway variables between the groups (P >0.05).

Conclusions

The use of headgear did not result in any change in airway width, both short-term and long-term. A decrease in SNA and an increase in SN-PP were found with the use of the headgear, and these changes remained stable for up to 8 years posttreatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与未接受治疗的对照组相比,接受头套治疗的患者骨骼和气道尺寸的长期变化。
本研究的目的是评估与头套使用相关的短期和长期骨骼和气道变化,并将这些变化与未治疗的对照组进行比较。方法:将样本分为2个II类组,分别为颈帽治疗组和未治疗对照组,每组30例。在预处理(T1)、治疗后(T2)和长期拉伸后(T3) 3个时间点拍摄侧位脑电图,由一名检查者进行骨骼和气道测量。配对样本t检验比较各组T1、T2和T3骨骼和气道测量值,独立样本t检验比较治疗组(T2 - T1)、治疗后(T3 - T2)和治疗组与对照组整体(T3 - T1)骨骼和气道变化。结果:治疗组患者T2时SNA明显降低(3.1°),SN-PP明显升高(1.5°)(P < 0.05)。独立样本t检验显示,两组间气道各变量变化无显著差异(P < 0.05)。结论:无论短期还是长期,头套的使用均未导致气道宽度的改变。使用头套后,发现SNA下降,SN-PP增加,这些变化在治疗后8年内保持稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
432
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
期刊最新文献
Three-dimensional insights into miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion asymmetry: A novel cone-beam computed tomography-based analysis. Evaluation of facial profile and incisor inclination preferences in orthodontically treated borderline nonextraction and extraction Class I and mild Class II malocclusions. Mental health screening in the orthodontic setting: A feasibility study. Biomechanical analysis of mandibular molar intrusion with or without an archwire constriction bend: A finite element study. How do people perceive orthognathic surgery on YouTube? A sentiment and thematic analysis of 111,953 comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1