[History of ideas and psychiatric reform: Italy, Great Britain and Germany].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1055/a-2560-1372
Thomas Becker, Stefan Weinmann, Uta Gühne
{"title":"[History of ideas and psychiatric reform: Italy, Great Britain and Germany].","authors":"Thomas Becker, Stefan Weinmann, Uta Gühne","doi":"10.1055/a-2560-1372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ideas and societal structure interact. This paper focuses on relationships between the history of ideas and mental health reform in Italy, Great Britain and Germany. The Italian reform process is based on the ideas of Jean-Paul Sartre, Michel Foucault, phenomenology and Antonio Gramsci, with issues of human rights and social inclusion taking central stage; diagnostic concepts are (temporarily) put in brackets. In Great Britain, there is a strong tradition of empiricism coupled with Erving Goffman's institutional critique and analysis, evangelical (and Quaker) traditions of 'pauper and lunacy' politics, and high-quality evaluation of services. In (the Federal Republic of) Germany, Foucault, Goffman, anthropological-phenomenological psychiatry and international impulses are relevant. With its radical institutional critique and transformation towards comprehensive community care (in the face of tight finances), Italy's mental health reforms are impressive. In Great Britain there is a long-term orientation towards community mental health care, evidence-based services and a focus on patient rights (mixed with neoliberal elements in recent decades). In Germany, mental hospital reform was carried out based on the recommendations of a national Psychiatric Enquiry (White Paper, Psychiatrie-Enquête, 1975) but large psychiatric institutions are not closed, community psychiatric transformation is delayed. There is a recent surge of integrated care models with flexibility of care provision across the inpatient-community divide.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"454-459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2560-1372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ideas and societal structure interact. This paper focuses on relationships between the history of ideas and mental health reform in Italy, Great Britain and Germany. The Italian reform process is based on the ideas of Jean-Paul Sartre, Michel Foucault, phenomenology and Antonio Gramsci, with issues of human rights and social inclusion taking central stage; diagnostic concepts are (temporarily) put in brackets. In Great Britain, there is a strong tradition of empiricism coupled with Erving Goffman's institutional critique and analysis, evangelical (and Quaker) traditions of 'pauper and lunacy' politics, and high-quality evaluation of services. In (the Federal Republic of) Germany, Foucault, Goffman, anthropological-phenomenological psychiatry and international impulses are relevant. With its radical institutional critique and transformation towards comprehensive community care (in the face of tight finances), Italy's mental health reforms are impressive. In Great Britain there is a long-term orientation towards community mental health care, evidence-based services and a focus on patient rights (mixed with neoliberal elements in recent decades). In Germany, mental hospital reform was carried out based on the recommendations of a national Psychiatric Enquiry (White Paper, Psychiatrie-Enquête, 1975) but large psychiatric institutions are not closed, community psychiatric transformation is delayed. There is a recent surge of integrated care models with flexibility of care provision across the inpatient-community divide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[思想史和精神病学改革:意大利、英国和德国]。
思想和社会结构相互作用。本文主要研究意大利、英国和德国的思想史与心理健康改革之间的关系。意大利的改革进程以萨特、福柯、现象学和葛兰西的思想为基础,以人权和社会包容问题为中心;诊断概念(暂时)放在括号中。在英国,有很强的经验主义传统,加上欧文·戈夫曼(Erving Goffman)的制度批判和分析,福音派(和贵格会)的“乞丐和疯子”政治传统,以及对服务的高质量评估。在德意志联邦共和国,福柯、戈夫曼、人类学现象学精神病学和国际冲动是相关的。意大利的精神卫生改革令人印象深刻,其激进的制度批判和向全面社区护理的转变(面对财政紧张)。在英国,长期倾向于社区精神保健、循证服务和注重病人权利(近几十年来与新自由主义因素混合在一起)。在德国,精神病院改革是根据国家精神病学调查的建议进行的(白皮书,Psychiatrie-Enquête, 1975年),但大型精神病院没有关闭,社区精神病学改造也被推迟。最近出现了一种综合护理模式,这种模式具有跨越住院病人-社区鸿沟的护理提供的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
[Medical Delegation to Physician Assistants (PAs): Organizational Liability as the Primary Risk in Borderline Cases]. [Some thoughts on "Querdenken" yesterday and today - from the Berlin anti-Semitism controversy in the 19th century to "Querdenken" in the 21st century]. [Sektorenübergreifende Bewegungsversorgung - eine qualitative Studie zu den Aufgaben und Kompetenzen in der Netzwerkkoordination am Beispiel des Netzwerks ActiveOncoKids (NAOK)]. [Medical resource needs and telemedical potential in after-hours care: An exploratory survey among physicians]. [Correction: Challenges in Rehabilitation of People with Cognitive and/or Multiple Impairments: Insights from a Pilot Study].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1