Examining the barriers and facilitators to mental health service provision for autistic people in Ireland: a survey of psychiatrists.

IF 2.1 Q3 PSYCHIATRY IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1017/ipm.2025.9
Louise Gallagher, Laura Crane, Thomas Dinneen, Noha Ibrahim, Niamh Mulryan, Nadia Bolshakova, Adam Harris, Linda O'Rourke, Elizabeth Pellicano
{"title":"Examining the barriers and facilitators to mental health service provision for autistic people in Ireland: a survey of psychiatrists.","authors":"Louise Gallagher, Laura Crane, Thomas Dinneen, Noha Ibrahim, Niamh Mulryan, Nadia Bolshakova, Adam Harris, Linda O'Rourke, Elizabeth Pellicano","doi":"10.1017/ipm.2025.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autistic people have high levels of mental ill-health and an increased risk of suicide across the lifespan. Yet autistic people report difficulties communicating with healthcare professionals and accessing a range of healthcare services. At the same time, mental healthcare workers in other countries are reporting links between confidence when working with autistic patients and the degree of autism knowledge and training they can access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sought to examine what factors helped or hindered Irish mental healthcare colleagues when working with autistic healthcare service users. An online survey using quantitative and qualitative metrics was circulated among psychiatrists who are members of the College of Psychiatrists of Ireland, both in training and at consultant level, from April 2021 to April 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Knowledge of autism was high among psychiatrists (<i>n</i> = 140), but self-efficacy scores were variable, particularly in relation to care pathways. Self-efficacy was better among psychiatrists with caseloads of children and youth or individuals with co-occurring intellectual disabilities. Three key qualitative themes emerged relating to capacity and training of mental health professionals, ways to improve mental health services provision for autistic individuals and also the critical need for co-creation and neurodiversity affirmative care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlighted critical systemic and professional challenges in providing mental health care to autistic people in Ireland. We provide recommendations for reducing these challenges and for enabling the development of inclusive, evidenced-based care to autistic individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46220,"journal":{"name":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2025.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Autistic people have high levels of mental ill-health and an increased risk of suicide across the lifespan. Yet autistic people report difficulties communicating with healthcare professionals and accessing a range of healthcare services. At the same time, mental healthcare workers in other countries are reporting links between confidence when working with autistic patients and the degree of autism knowledge and training they can access.

Methods: We sought to examine what factors helped or hindered Irish mental healthcare colleagues when working with autistic healthcare service users. An online survey using quantitative and qualitative metrics was circulated among psychiatrists who are members of the College of Psychiatrists of Ireland, both in training and at consultant level, from April 2021 to April 2022.

Results: Knowledge of autism was high among psychiatrists (n = 140), but self-efficacy scores were variable, particularly in relation to care pathways. Self-efficacy was better among psychiatrists with caseloads of children and youth or individuals with co-occurring intellectual disabilities. Three key qualitative themes emerged relating to capacity and training of mental health professionals, ways to improve mental health services provision for autistic individuals and also the critical need for co-creation and neurodiversity affirmative care.

Conclusions: The study highlighted critical systemic and professional challenges in providing mental health care to autistic people in Ireland. We provide recommendations for reducing these challenges and for enabling the development of inclusive, evidenced-based care to autistic individuals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检查爱尔兰为自闭症患者提供心理健康服务的障碍和促进因素:对精神病医生的调查。
背景:自闭症患者的心理不健康程度很高,在整个生命周期中自杀的风险也会增加。然而,自闭症患者表示很难与医护人员沟通,也很难获得各种医疗服务。与此同时,其他国家的心理医护人员也报告称,与自闭症患者合作时的信心与他们所能获得的自闭症知识和培训程度之间存在联系:我们试图研究爱尔兰精神医疗工作者在与自闭症医疗服务用户合作时,哪些因素对他们有帮助,哪些因素对他们有阻碍。在 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 4 月期间,我们向爱尔兰精神科医师学院的精神科医师(包括受训医师和顾问级医师)分发了一份在线调查问卷,采用了定量和定性指标:精神科医生对自闭症的了解程度较高(n = 140),但自我效能得分参差不齐,尤其是在护理路径方面。负责儿童和青少年或同时患有智力障碍的精神科医生的自我效能较高。研究得出了三个关键的定性主题,分别涉及心理健康专业人员的能力和培训、改善自闭症患者心理健康服务的方法,以及共同创造和神经多样性平权护理的关键需求:本研究强调了在爱尔兰为自闭症患者提供心理健康护理时所面临的系统性和专业性挑战。我们提出了一些建议,以减少这些挑战,并为自闭症患者提供包容性的、以证据为基础的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.90%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Declining restrictive practice in approved centres in Ireland: improving quality of care through the adoption of a human rights-based approach. Developing a national treatment strategy for personality disorder in Ireland. Generative AI and reassurance-seeking in OCD. Psilocybin reporting in media (PRiMe) for the treatment of depression. Designing and refining a specialty: the collaborative development of a Model of Care for Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry in Ireland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1