Nurses' perception of talent management scale (NPTMS): development, validation and psychometric properties.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02882-8
Duygu Gül, Betül Sönmez
{"title":"Nurses' perception of talent management scale (NPTMS): development, validation and psychometric properties.","authors":"Duygu Gül, Betül Sönmez","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02882-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an increasing need for a new and comprehensive approach to evaluate nursing talent to increase effectiveness and productivity. Talent management, which plays an important role in identifying, developing and retaining nursing talent, is a key strategy for investing in nursing. This study aimed to develop the Nurses' Perception of Talent Management Scale (NPTMS) and assess its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scale was developed using a methodological design with a convenience sampling method including 918 nurses (n<sub>EFA</sub>=422, n<sub>CFA</sub>=496) from 12 hospitals in Istanbul between September and April 2022. The scale was developed in three phases. Firstly, items reflecting talent management in nursing were created through a comprehensive literature review employing the deductive method. Then, the face and content validity of the scale were evaluated. Finally, construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, concurrent validity, convergent and divergent validity) and reliability (item-total score correlation, split-half method, Cronbach's α coefficient, equivalent forms reliability and test-retest) were evaluated for psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The newly developed scale, for which validity and reliability analyses were conducted using two separate samples through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, was found to consist of 26 items and a single factor. This factor explained 63.2% of the variance related to the structure and showed acceptable goodness of fit (χ2/sd = 4.325, RMSEA = 0.078, RMR = 0.046, TLI = 0.915, CFI = 0.924, NFI = 0.903, GFI = 0.882, IFI = 0.924). The content validity of the scale was found to be 0.95. Construct validity results indicated that the scale exhibited strong concurrent validity (r<sub>EFA</sub> =0.755, r<sub>CFA</sub> =0.772, p < 0.05) and convergent and divergent validity (AVE > 0.5; CR > 0.8; CR > AVE). The reliability analyses revealed high internal consistency (0.976<sub>EFA</sub>;0.978<sub>CFA</sub>), time invariance (ICC = 0.836), and equivalent forms reliability (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing nurses' perceptions of talent management. It can be used to evaluate talent management practices in nursing and developing policies and strategies that support investment in nursing talent.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02882-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing need for a new and comprehensive approach to evaluate nursing talent to increase effectiveness and productivity. Talent management, which plays an important role in identifying, developing and retaining nursing talent, is a key strategy for investing in nursing. This study aimed to develop the Nurses' Perception of Talent Management Scale (NPTMS) and assess its psychometric properties.

Methods: The scale was developed using a methodological design with a convenience sampling method including 918 nurses (nEFA=422, nCFA=496) from 12 hospitals in Istanbul between September and April 2022. The scale was developed in three phases. Firstly, items reflecting talent management in nursing were created through a comprehensive literature review employing the deductive method. Then, the face and content validity of the scale were evaluated. Finally, construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, concurrent validity, convergent and divergent validity) and reliability (item-total score correlation, split-half method, Cronbach's α coefficient, equivalent forms reliability and test-retest) were evaluated for psychometric properties.

Results: The newly developed scale, for which validity and reliability analyses were conducted using two separate samples through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, was found to consist of 26 items and a single factor. This factor explained 63.2% of the variance related to the structure and showed acceptable goodness of fit (χ2/sd = 4.325, RMSEA = 0.078, RMR = 0.046, TLI = 0.915, CFI = 0.924, NFI = 0.903, GFI = 0.882, IFI = 0.924). The content validity of the scale was found to be 0.95. Construct validity results indicated that the scale exhibited strong concurrent validity (rEFA =0.755, rCFA =0.772, p < 0.05) and convergent and divergent validity (AVE > 0.5; CR > 0.8; CR > AVE). The reliability analyses revealed high internal consistency (0.976EFA;0.978CFA), time invariance (ICC = 0.836), and equivalent forms reliability (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessing nurses' perceptions of talent management. It can be used to evaluate talent management practices in nursing and developing policies and strategies that support investment in nursing talent.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士对人才管理的认知量表(NPTMS):开发、验证和心理测量学特性。
背景:为了提高护理人才的有效性和生产力,越来越需要一种新的、全面的方法来评估护理人才。人才管理是护理投资的关键策略,在发现、培养和留住护理人才方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在编制护士人才管理知觉量表(NPTMS),并评估其心理测量学性质。方法:采用方法学设计,采用方便抽样法,对伊斯坦布尔12家医院的918名护士(nEFA=422, nCFA=496)进行问卷调查。该量表分为三个阶段开发。首先,运用演绎法,通过文献综述,构建反映护理人才管理的项目。然后对量表的面效度和内容效度进行评价。最后,对构念效度(探索性和验证性因子分析、并发效度、收敛效度和发散效度)和信度(项目总分相关、劈半法、Cronbach’s α系数、等效形式信度和重测)进行心理测量特性评估。结果:新编制的量表通过探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析,采用两个独立样本进行了效度和信度分析,发现量表由26个项目和1个因子组成。该因素解释了与结构相关的63.2%的方差,具有可接受的拟合优度(χ2/sd = 4.325, RMSEA = 0.078, RMR = 0.046, TLI = 0.915, CFI = 0.924, NFI = 0.903, GFI = 0.882, IFI = 0.924)。量表的内容效度为0.95。建构效度结果显示,量表具有较强的并发效度(rEFA =0.755, rCFA =0.772, p 0.5;cr > 0.8;br br br br br br br;信度分析显示,量表具有较高的内部一致性(0.976EFA;0.978CFA)、时间不稳定性(ICC = 0.836)和等效形式信度(p)。结论:该量表是评估护士人才管理认知的有效、可靠的工具。它可以用来评估护理人才管理实践,并制定支持护理人才投资的政策和战略。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Development of a multi-skill, haptic-supported virtual reality simulation for first-year nursing students: a pilot study. Correction: Artificial intelligence-assisted nursing care: a concept analysis using Walker and Avant approach. Humanization of nursing care in hospitalized patients with non-communicable diseases: a phenomenological qualitative study. Determination of contraceptive knowledge, attitude, and behavior among nursing students in Northern Cyprus: a cross-sectional study. Turkish neonatal nurses' knowledge regarding the enteral feeding in preterm infants: a descriptive, cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1