Retrospective Clinical Study on Early Prediction of Anastomotic Leak After Esophageal Cancer Resection Based on the Combination of Platelet Count and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio.

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.81589
Shu Wu, Linxiang Zhang, Yamen Muad, Zhong Xu, Lin Ye
{"title":"Retrospective Clinical Study on Early Prediction of Anastomotic Leak After Esophageal Cancer Resection Based on the Combination of Platelet Count and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio.","authors":"Shu Wu, Linxiang Zhang, Yamen Muad, Zhong Xu, Lin Ye","doi":"10.7759/cureus.81589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> The systemic inflammatory response may influence the occurrence of postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive potential of combining platelet count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (COP-NLR) for esophagogastric anastomotic leak (AL) following esophageal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We enrolled patients who developed AL after radical surgery for esophageal cancer and those who did not develop AL after the surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China, from June 2019 to February 2022. We analyzed the correlation between AL and several risk factors, including COP-NLR. Patients were categorized as COP-NLR 2 if both platelet count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were elevated, COP-NLR 1 if either parameter was elevated, and COP-NLR 0 if neither parameter showed elevation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 190 patients were included in this study. The incidence of AL after esophageal cancer surgery was 14.7%. The critical values of preoperative NLR and preoperative platelet count were 2.41 (sensitivity 48.8%, specificity 92.9%, and area under the curve (AUC) 0.728) and 186 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L (sensitivity 45.3%, specificity 78.9%, and AUC 0.667), respectively. According to multivariate analysis, COP-NLR was identified as an independent risk factor for AL (COP-NLR 1 vs. COP-NLR 0: odds ratio (OR) 4.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-23.61; COP-NLR 2 vs. COP-NLR 0: OR 11.12, 95% CI 2.31-53.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> COP-NLR is a new predictor for AL after esophageal cancer resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 4","pages":"e81589"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.81589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  The systemic inflammatory response may influence the occurrence of postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive potential of combining platelet count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (COP-NLR) for esophagogastric anastomotic leak (AL) following esophageal cancer surgery.

Methods:  We enrolled patients who developed AL after radical surgery for esophageal cancer and those who did not develop AL after the surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China, from June 2019 to February 2022. We analyzed the correlation between AL and several risk factors, including COP-NLR. Patients were categorized as COP-NLR 2 if both platelet count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were elevated, COP-NLR 1 if either parameter was elevated, and COP-NLR 0 if neither parameter showed elevation.

Results:  A total of 190 patients were included in this study. The incidence of AL after esophageal cancer surgery was 14.7%. The critical values of preoperative NLR and preoperative platelet count were 2.41 (sensitivity 48.8%, specificity 92.9%, and area under the curve (AUC) 0.728) and 186 × 109/L (sensitivity 45.3%, specificity 78.9%, and AUC 0.667), respectively. According to multivariate analysis, COP-NLR was identified as an independent risk factor for AL (COP-NLR 1 vs. COP-NLR 0: odds ratio (OR) 4.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-23.61; COP-NLR 2 vs. COP-NLR 0: OR 11.12, 95% CI 2.31-53.41).

Conclusion:  COP-NLR is a new predictor for AL after esophageal cancer resection.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血小板计数与中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值联合早期预测食管癌术后吻合口瘘的回顾性临床研究。
目的:全身炎症反应可能影响术后并发症的发生。本研究旨在评价联合血小板计数和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(copl - nlr)对食管癌术后食管胃吻合口漏(AL)的预测潜力。方法:我们招募了2019年6月至2022年2月在中国重庆医科大学第一附属医院接受食管癌根治性手术后发生AL和术后未发生AL的患者。我们分析了AL与包括COP-NLR在内的几个危险因素的相关性。如果血小板计数和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)均升高,则将患者分类为COP-NLR 2;如果其中任何一个参数升高,则将患者分类为COP-NLR 1;如果这两个参数均未升高,则将患者分类为COP-NLR 0。结果:本研究共纳入190例患者。食管癌术后AL发生率为14.7%。术前NLR和血小板计数临界值分别为2.41(敏感性48.8%,特异性92.9%,曲线下面积(AUC) 0.728)和186 × 109/L(敏感性45.3%,特异性78.9%,AUC 0.667)。多因素分析表明,COP-NLR为AL的独立危险因素(COP-NLR 1 vs. COP-NLR 0:优势比(OR) 4.98, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.05 ~ 23.61;COP-NLR 2与COP-NLR 0: OR 11.12, 95% CI 2.31-53.41)。结论:COP-NLR是食管癌术后AL的一个新的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Result of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers in the Treatment of Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Associated Esophageal Ulcer. Pulmonary Nodules and Splenic Lesions as Rare Extraintestinal Manifestations of Crohn's Disease. Regenerative High Purity Type I Collagen Scaffold for Breast Cancer Excision Repair and Reconstruction: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial. Spontaneous Resolution of Extensive Haemosiderin Skin Staining Following Iron Infusion During Pregnancy. Effectiveness of Different Acceleration Methods for the En Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1