Retrospective analysis to validate the CTS5 in patients from El Álamo IV registry and GEICAM adjuvant studies.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf040
Sara Lopez-Tarruella, Marina Pollán, Eva Carrasco, Raquel Andrés, Miguel Martín, Sonia Servitja, Begoña Bermejo, Antonio Antón, Ángel Guerrero-Zotano, Montserrat Muñoz, Luis Fernández, Purificación Martínez Del Prado, Isabel Álvarez, Lourdes Calvo, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, María Marín, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Jesús Herranz, Óscar Polonio, Encarna Adrover, Diana Moreno
{"title":"Retrospective analysis to validate the CTS5 in patients from El Álamo IV registry and GEICAM adjuvant studies.","authors":"Sara Lopez-Tarruella, Marina Pollán, Eva Carrasco, Raquel Andrés, Miguel Martín, Sonia Servitja, Begoña Bermejo, Antonio Antón, Ángel Guerrero-Zotano, Montserrat Muñoz, Luis Fernández, Purificación Martínez Del Prado, Isabel Álvarez, Lourdes Calvo, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, María Marín, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Jesús Herranz, Óscar Polonio, Encarna Adrover, Diana Moreno","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying high-risk of late recurrence (beyond 10 years) in patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer (EBC) is crucial. The Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) score assesses recurrence risk after 5 years of endocrine therapy (ET). This study validated CTS5 as a prognostic tool for late recurrence by examining its association with Distant Recurrence-Free Survival using GEICAM study data and evaluating model calibration.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 5739 hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative EBC patients from the El Álamo IV registry (N = 3509, diagnosed between 2002 and 2005) and 4 adjuvant GEICAM studies (N = 2680, conducted between 1996 and 2006). All patients were distant recurrence-free and alive 5 years after starting adjuvant ET.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CTS5 classified 43.9% of patients as low-risk, 32.2% as intermediate-risk, and 23.9% as high-risk. Significant differences in DR were observed: hazard ratio (HR) for intermediate- vs. low-risk was 2.55 (95% CI, 1.85-3.51, P < .0001), and HR for high- vs. low-risk was 5.77 (95% CI, 4.28-7.78, P < .0001). Similar results were found across subgroups by menopausal status, duration of adjuvant ET, and prior adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Calibration showed CTS5 overestimated DR rates in low-risk (P = .0314) and high-risk (P < .0001) patients compared to observed rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CTS5 categorized patients based on late DR risk regardless of menopausal status, ET duration, or CT treatment. However, the model tended to overestimate events, particularly in high-risk groups, especially among those treated with ET for less than 60 months or not receiving CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying high-risk of late recurrence (beyond 10 years) in patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer (EBC) is crucial. The Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) score assesses recurrence risk after 5 years of endocrine therapy (ET). This study validated CTS5 as a prognostic tool for late recurrence by examining its association with Distant Recurrence-Free Survival using GEICAM study data and evaluating model calibration.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 5739 hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative EBC patients from the El Álamo IV registry (N = 3509, diagnosed between 2002 and 2005) and 4 adjuvant GEICAM studies (N = 2680, conducted between 1996 and 2006). All patients were distant recurrence-free and alive 5 years after starting adjuvant ET.

Results: The CTS5 classified 43.9% of patients as low-risk, 32.2% as intermediate-risk, and 23.9% as high-risk. Significant differences in DR were observed: hazard ratio (HR) for intermediate- vs. low-risk was 2.55 (95% CI, 1.85-3.51, P < .0001), and HR for high- vs. low-risk was 5.77 (95% CI, 4.28-7.78, P < .0001). Similar results were found across subgroups by menopausal status, duration of adjuvant ET, and prior adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Calibration showed CTS5 overestimated DR rates in low-risk (P = .0314) and high-risk (P < .0001) patients compared to observed rates.

Conclusions: The CTS5 categorized patients based on late DR risk regardless of menopausal status, ET duration, or CT treatment. However, the model tended to overestimate events, particularly in high-risk groups, especially among those treated with ET for less than 60 months or not receiving CT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾性分析验证El Álamo IV注册和GEICAM辅助研究患者的CTS5。
背景:识别激素受体阳性her2阴性早期乳腺癌(EBC)患者晚期复发(超过10年)的高危人群至关重要。5年后临床治疗评分(CTS5)评估5年内分泌治疗(ET)后的复发风险。该研究通过使用GEICAM研究数据和评估模型校准,验证了CTS5作为晚期复发的预后工具。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了El Álamo IV登记的5739例激素受体阳性her2阴性EBC患者(N = 3509,诊断于2002年至2005年)和4项辅助GEICAM研究(N = 2680,进行于1996年至2006年)。结果:CTS5将43.9%的患者归为低危,32.2%为中危,23.9%为高危。观察到DR的显著差异:中危与低危的风险比(HR)为2.55 (95% CI, 1.85-3.51, P)。结论:CTS5根据晚期DR风险对患者进行分类,与绝经状态、ET持续时间或CT治疗无关。然而,该模型倾向于高估事件,特别是在高危人群中,特别是在接受ET治疗少于60个月或未接受CT治疗的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
期刊最新文献
The Quadruple Immunotherapy for Colorectal Cancer (QuICC) Trial for Mismatch Repair-Proficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Real-world patterns of post-progression treatment and outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Actionable Genomic Landscape of Biliary Tract Cancer in the Indian Population. Granisetron Transdermal Delivery System Versus Palonosetron in the Prevention of Long-delayed Nausea and Vomiting: A Phase III Randomized Trial. How Often Do Oncologists Receive Industry Payments from Competing Companies?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1