Implementing '6S' Nursing Management in Sterilization and Supply Centers: Enhancing Surgical Instrument Quality and Work Efficiency.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S508701
Li Fang, Kaiping Xiao, Hongyu Zhu, Mingxia Zhang
{"title":"Implementing '6S' Nursing Management in Sterilization and Supply Centers: Enhancing Surgical Instrument Quality and Work Efficiency.","authors":"Li Fang, Kaiping Xiao, Hongyu Zhu, Mingxia Zhang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S508701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the implementation of '6S' nursing management in sterilization and supply centers to evaluate its impact on improving surgical instrument management and overall operational quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The pre-management phase was from January to June 2019, during which the conventional management mode was applied in our hospital's sterilization and supply center, and 100 instrument packs were selected for quality inspection. The post-management phase was from July to December 2019, when the 6S management mode was implemented in the sterilization and supply center, with another 100 instrument packs selected for quality inspection. A total of 20 staff members were involved. The management quality (environmental management, packaging management, cleaning and sterilization, and instrument management), mastery of professional knowledge (theoretical knowledge, practical knowledge, and nursing skill knowledge), incidence of surgical instrument processing errors, quality of work (grooming, problem-solving, sense of responsibility, sense of initiative, and team communication), and work pass rate before and after 6S management were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 6S management, the management quality scores were higher, the mastery of professional knowledge of personnel was raised, the quality of work was promoted, the overall incidence of errors in surgical instrument processing was reduced to 1%, and the qualification rates for cleaning, sterilization, and issuance were all increased to 100%, with significant differences compared to before the implementation of management measures (all <i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of \"6S\" nursing management in the sterilization and supply center is an effective approach to addressing the current challenges of enhancing sterilization quality and management efficiency, significantly improving the quality of surgical instruments and work efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1099-1108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S508701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the implementation of '6S' nursing management in sterilization and supply centers to evaluate its impact on improving surgical instrument management and overall operational quality.

Methods: The pre-management phase was from January to June 2019, during which the conventional management mode was applied in our hospital's sterilization and supply center, and 100 instrument packs were selected for quality inspection. The post-management phase was from July to December 2019, when the 6S management mode was implemented in the sterilization and supply center, with another 100 instrument packs selected for quality inspection. A total of 20 staff members were involved. The management quality (environmental management, packaging management, cleaning and sterilization, and instrument management), mastery of professional knowledge (theoretical knowledge, practical knowledge, and nursing skill knowledge), incidence of surgical instrument processing errors, quality of work (grooming, problem-solving, sense of responsibility, sense of initiative, and team communication), and work pass rate before and after 6S management were compared.

Results: After 6S management, the management quality scores were higher, the mastery of professional knowledge of personnel was raised, the quality of work was promoted, the overall incidence of errors in surgical instrument processing was reduced to 1%, and the qualification rates for cleaning, sterilization, and issuance were all increased to 100%, with significant differences compared to before the implementation of management measures (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The application of "6S" nursing management in the sterilization and supply center is an effective approach to addressing the current challenges of enhancing sterilization quality and management efficiency, significantly improving the quality of surgical instruments and work efficiency.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消毒供应中心实施“6S”护理管理:提高手术器械质量和工作效率。
目的:探讨“6S”护理管理在消毒供应中心的实施情况,评价其对提高手术器械管理水平和整体手术质量的影响。方法:预管理阶段为2019年1 - 6月,在我院消毒供应中心采用常规管理模式,选取100个器械包进行质量检查。后管理阶段为2019年7月至12月,在灭菌供应中心实施6S管理模式,并选择另外100个仪器包进行质量检查。共涉及20名工作人员。比较6S管理前后的管理质量(环境管理、包装管理、清洗灭菌、器械管理)、专业知识掌握(理论知识、实践知识、护理技能知识)、手术器械加工差错发生率、工作质量(梳理、解决问题、责任感、主动性、团队沟通)、工作合格率。结果:实施6S管理后,管理质量得分较高,人员专业知识掌握程度提高,工作质量得到提升,手术器械加工总体错误率降至1%,清洗、灭菌、发放合格率均提高至100%,与实施管理措施前比较差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。结论:“6S”护理管理在消毒供应中心的应用是应对当前提高消毒质量和管理效率挑战的有效途径,可显著提高手术器械质量和工作效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Health Insurance Claims Processing: The Role of Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI). Characterization of the Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Psychotropic Medications Based on a Spontaneous Reporting Systems Database: A Retrospective Analysis. Development and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Intrahospital Transport Adverse Events in Critically Ill Gynecological Patients. Risk Assessment of Emergency Medical Resource Exhaustion Under Major Infectious Disease Outbreaks: Based on Discrete-Event Simulation Models. Mitigating Systemic Risks in Aging Services: An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Fiscal Policy, Service Quality, and Workforce Supply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1