Standardized electronic order sets decreases inpatient opioid use in emergency general surgery

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116299
Adam Timothy Lucy , Angela Danielle Sickels , Elise Aucoin Dasinger , Laura M. Leal , Lauren Caldwell Tanner , Virginia Strickland Pierce , Sabrina D. Goddard , Mohammad Zain Hashmi
{"title":"Standardized electronic order sets decreases inpatient opioid use in emergency general surgery","authors":"Adam Timothy Lucy ,&nbsp;Angela Danielle Sickels ,&nbsp;Elise Aucoin Dasinger ,&nbsp;Laura M. Leal ,&nbsp;Lauren Caldwell Tanner ,&nbsp;Virginia Strickland Pierce ,&nbsp;Sabrina D. Goddard ,&nbsp;Mohammad Zain Hashmi","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Effective pain management while limiting opioids optimizes surgical care. Emergency general surgery (EGS) patients are a vulnerable population and are excluded from enhanced recovery pathways. We examined the effect of standardized pain control order sets for EGS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An interprofessionally designed opioid protocol was embedded into admission order sets. Oral and IV morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were monitored from Jan 2019–Jun 2023 for all EGS patients and comparted pre and post-implementation. Primary outcome was total MME and MME per opioid dose administered. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and formulation trends.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Total MME per patient and average MME per dose per patient decreased significantly and were sustained for all administration routes. Lower MME medications were ordered and multimodal regimens increased. Pain scores were stable. MME reduction was sustained over time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Standardized pain management protocols decreased in-hospital opioid use in EGS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"244 ","pages":"Article 116299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025001217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Effective pain management while limiting opioids optimizes surgical care. Emergency general surgery (EGS) patients are a vulnerable population and are excluded from enhanced recovery pathways. We examined the effect of standardized pain control order sets for EGS.

Methods

An interprofessionally designed opioid protocol was embedded into admission order sets. Oral and IV morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were monitored from Jan 2019–Jun 2023 for all EGS patients and comparted pre and post-implementation. Primary outcome was total MME and MME per opioid dose administered. Secondary outcomes were pain scores and formulation trends.

Results

Total MME per patient and average MME per dose per patient decreased significantly and were sustained for all administration routes. Lower MME medications were ordered and multimodal regimens increased. Pain scores were stable. MME reduction was sustained over time.

Conclusion

Standardized pain management protocols decreased in-hospital opioid use in EGS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准化的电子处方集减少了急诊普通外科住院患者阿片类药物的使用
背景有效的疼痛管理同时限制阿片类药物可优化手术护理。急诊普外科(EGS)患者属于易感人群,被排除在强化康复路径之外。我们研究了针对 EGS 的标准化疼痛控制医嘱集的效果。方法将跨专业设计的阿片类药物协议嵌入入院医嘱集。从2019年1月至2023年6月,对所有EGS患者的口服和静脉注射吗啡毫克当量(MME)进行监测,并比较实施前后的情况。主要结果是总吗啡毫克当量和每次阿片类药物剂量的吗啡毫克当量。结果每位患者的总 MME 和每剂量平均 MME 显著下降,并且在所有给药途径中均保持不变。订购的 MME 较低的药物和多模式疗法有所增加。疼痛评分稳定。结论标准化疼痛管理方案减少了 EGS 患者院内阿片类药物的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of reintervention rates in mesh versus no-mesh inguinal hernia repair using electronic health records Fungating tumors, forgotten patients The suprapubic pseudosac crochet hook suspension technique in laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: An efficient alternative in pseudosac management Investigating optimal warming techniques for hypothermia in a swine model of ischemia Decreased utilization of component separation techniques over time in complex abdominal wall reconstruction following introduction of preoperative botulinum toxin A
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1