Usability of a Mobile Point-of-Care App for the Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Gastro hep advances Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.gastha.2024.100604
Evan S. Dellon , Glenn T. Furuta , Nick Tomeo , Anya Karavanov , Zoe Smernoff , Joy Harrington , Seema S. Aceves
{"title":"Usability of a Mobile Point-of-Care App for the Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis","authors":"Evan S. Dellon ,&nbsp;Glenn T. Furuta ,&nbsp;Nick Tomeo ,&nbsp;Anya Karavanov ,&nbsp;Zoe Smernoff ,&nbsp;Joy Harrington ,&nbsp;Seema S. Aceves","doi":"10.1016/j.gastha.2024.100604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>A new application (app) allows the Index of Severity for EoE (I-SEE) to be used at the point of care. We aimed to perform usability testing of the I-SEE mobile app and identify areas for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We recruited 60 practitioners (20 adult and 20 pediatric gastroenterologists; 20 allergists) to use I-SEE on ≥5 EoE patients seen in clinic and undergo interviews by trained qualitative researchers. The interview guide focused on overall user experience, user satisfaction, and desired improvements. It also explored potential perceived barriers to using the app and I-SEE.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Though I-SEE was new to most providers, they found it took only a few minutes to calculate the score. All interviewees either “agreed” (5%) or “strongly agreed” (95%) with the statement, “The app was easy to navigate,” and almost all (95%) either “agreed” (42%) or “strongly agreed” (53%) with “The app’s features and functionalities were intuitive and easy to understand”. The large majority (85%) reported satisfaction with the app. Responses were similar for allergists, and adult and pediatric gastroenterologists. Areas of suggested improvement included updating design features, incorporation into electronic medical records, addressing if scoring for children and adults should be different, and clarifying clinical implications of I-SEE for management.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The I-SEE app was user friendly and able to be completed rapidly in clinical practice. Interviewee feedback led to app updates to improve visualization and use. In the future, scoring for children should be confirmed and I-SEE should be validated by linking severity to treatment and monitoring recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73130,"journal":{"name":"Gastro hep advances","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastro hep advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772572324002000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

A new application (app) allows the Index of Severity for EoE (I-SEE) to be used at the point of care. We aimed to perform usability testing of the I-SEE mobile app and identify areas for improvement.

Methods

We recruited 60 practitioners (20 adult and 20 pediatric gastroenterologists; 20 allergists) to use I-SEE on ≥5 EoE patients seen in clinic and undergo interviews by trained qualitative researchers. The interview guide focused on overall user experience, user satisfaction, and desired improvements. It also explored potential perceived barriers to using the app and I-SEE.

Results

Though I-SEE was new to most providers, they found it took only a few minutes to calculate the score. All interviewees either “agreed” (5%) or “strongly agreed” (95%) with the statement, “The app was easy to navigate,” and almost all (95%) either “agreed” (42%) or “strongly agreed” (53%) with “The app’s features and functionalities were intuitive and easy to understand”. The large majority (85%) reported satisfaction with the app. Responses were similar for allergists, and adult and pediatric gastroenterologists. Areas of suggested improvement included updating design features, incorporation into electronic medical records, addressing if scoring for children and adults should be different, and clarifying clinical implications of I-SEE for management.

Conclusion

The I-SEE app was user friendly and able to be completed rapidly in clinical practice. Interviewee feedback led to app updates to improve visualization and use. In the future, scoring for children should be confirmed and I-SEE should be validated by linking severity to treatment and monitoring recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎严重程度指数移动护理点应用程序的可用性
背景和AimsA新的应用程序(app)允许在护理点使用EoE严重程度指数(I-SEE)。我们的目标是对I-SEE移动应用程序进行可用性测试,并确定需要改进的地方。方法招募60名执业医师(20名成人和20名儿科胃肠病学家;20名过敏症专家)对临床见过的≥5例EoE患者使用I-SEE,并接受训练有素的定性研究人员的访谈。访谈指南关注的是整体用户体验、用户满意度和期望的改进。它还探讨了使用该应用程序和I-SEE的潜在感知障碍。结果虽然I-SEE对大多数医疗服务提供者来说是新的,但他们发现计算分数只需要几分钟。所有受访者“同意”(5%)或“非常同意”(95%)“该应用程序易于操作”,几乎所有受访者(95%)“同意”(42%)或“非常同意”(53%)“该应用程序的特性和功能直观且易于理解”。绝大多数人(85%)表示对该应用程序感到满意。过敏科医生、成人和儿科胃肠病学家的反应类似。建议改进的领域包括更新设计特征,纳入电子病历,解决儿童和成人的评分是否应该不同,以及澄清I-SEE对管理的临床意义。结论I-SEE应用界面友好,可快速完成临床应用。受访者的反馈导致了应用程序的更新,以提高可视化和使用。在未来,应该通过将严重程度与治疗和监测建议联系起来,对儿童进行评分,并对I-SEE进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastro hep advances
Gastro hep advances Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
Reply Swallowed Nasal Fluticasone Spray for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: An Affordable and Off-Label Path to Histologic Remission Scarred From the Inside: A Case of Idiopathic Sclerosing Mesenteritis Multidisciplinary Assessment and Management of Functional Dysphagia Comparative Efficacy of all Available Pharmaceutical Therapies for Moderate to Severe Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1