Perceptions of consent for a paediatric telehealth trial during emergency transport in Pakistan.

Abstract

Introduction: Childhood mortality in the emergency setting is disproportionately high in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC), with limited research dedicated to improving timely interventions, especially for critically ill children during transport. To perform essential prehospital paediatric research, there is a need for a tailored consent process, which reflects the specific needs and concerns of participants in this challenging research context.

Objective: The objective is to prospectively investigate stakeholder perceptions and preferences regarding consent processes for a specific paediatric ambulance-based telemedicine trial.

Methods: Exploratory qualitative study design using face-to-face semistructured interviews and focus group discussions. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Participants included healthcare providers (paediatric telemedicine physicians and emergency medical technicians) and parents of children who required emergency transportation in Karachi, Pakistan.

Results: 47 participants, ranging from 19 to 47 years old, were involved in in-depth interviews or focus group discussions. The participants comprised 29 healthcare workers and 18 parents. Among them, 9 were women and 38 were men. Expressing diverse attitudes towards different consent methods, the majority recommended a prospective written informed consent approach to build trust and provide legal protection. Participants understood the situational incapacity that occurs in emergency settings, emphasised the importance of keeping the consent brief and recommended a subsequent contact in 2-3 days after the emergency transport to reconfirm consent and answer any questions.

Conclusion: Our interpretation of the findings revealed that participants preferred a staged consent process for telemedicine trials in LMIC paediatric emergency settings.