Beyond compliance: examining the completeness and determinants of WHO surgical safety checklist - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12569-0
Tesfaye Engdaw Habtie, Sefineh Fenta Feleke, Aregash Birhan Terefe, Molalign Aligaz Adisu
{"title":"Beyond compliance: examining the completeness and determinants of WHO surgical safety checklist - a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tesfaye Engdaw Habtie, Sefineh Fenta Feleke, Aregash Birhan Terefe, Molalign Aligaz Adisu","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12569-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the compliance, completeness, and key barriers to the successful initiation and implementation of checklists in surgical theaters.Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the included studies. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024589344).Results The review included 13 observational studies conducted globally, encompassing a total of 17,867 participants. The overall compliance rate with the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist was 73% (95% CI: 62-85%). Compliance rates for individual components were 76% for \"Sign In,\" 61% for \"Time Out,\" and 62% for \"Sign Out.\" The overall completeness of checklist implementation was 51%. Factors that improve compliance rate include prior Surgical Safety Checklist exposure, training, a positive work environment, management support, and regular monitoring with feedback. Conversely, barriers such as insufficient staffing, high workloads, lack of checklist ownership, resistance to change, weak audit systems, and rapid staff turnover hinder effective implementation and compliance.Conclusion Despite the importance of Surgical Safety Checklist in improving healthcare outcomes, its overall compliance rate across healthcare settings remains suboptimal, with a notably low completeness rate. This highlights the frequent omission or inconsistent application of critical checklist components. Maximizing the checklist's full potential requires continuous efforts, including sustained support, regular audit, and strong commitment from all stakeholders.Recommendation Policymakers, healthcare administrators, and surgical teams must work together to integrate the checklist into routine workflows, ensure continuous monitoring and support, and foster a culture of safety to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"504"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12569-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the compliance, completeness, and key barriers to the successful initiation and implementation of checklists in surgical theaters.Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the included studies. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024589344).Results The review included 13 observational studies conducted globally, encompassing a total of 17,867 participants. The overall compliance rate with the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist was 73% (95% CI: 62-85%). Compliance rates for individual components were 76% for "Sign In," 61% for "Time Out," and 62% for "Sign Out." The overall completeness of checklist implementation was 51%. Factors that improve compliance rate include prior Surgical Safety Checklist exposure, training, a positive work environment, management support, and regular monitoring with feedback. Conversely, barriers such as insufficient staffing, high workloads, lack of checklist ownership, resistance to change, weak audit systems, and rapid staff turnover hinder effective implementation and compliance.Conclusion Despite the importance of Surgical Safety Checklist in improving healthcare outcomes, its overall compliance rate across healthcare settings remains suboptimal, with a notably low completeness rate. This highlights the frequent omission or inconsistent application of critical checklist components. Maximizing the checklist's full potential requires continuous efforts, including sustained support, regular audit, and strong commitment from all stakeholders.Recommendation Policymakers, healthcare administrators, and surgical teams must work together to integrate the checklist into routine workflows, ensure continuous monitoring and support, and foster a culture of safety to improve patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越合规性:检查世卫组织手术安全核对表的完整性和决定因素-系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估手术室成功启动和实施核对表的依从性、完整性和主要障碍。该方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42024589344)上注册。结果 该综述包括 13 项在全球范围内进行的观察性研究,共有 17867 人参与。世界卫生组织手术安全清单的总体符合率为 73%(95% CI:62-85%)。单项内容的符合率分别为:"签到 "76%,"暂停 "61%,"签退 "62%。检查表执行的总体完整率为 51%。提高合规率的因素包括之前接触过手术安全核对表、培训、积极的工作环境、管理层的支持以及定期监测和反馈。相反,人员配备不足、工作量大、缺乏核对表主人翁意识、抵制变革、审计系统薄弱以及人员流动快等障碍则会阻碍核对表的有效实施和合规性。这凸显出核对表的关键部分经常被遗漏或应用不一致。建议 政策制定者、医疗管理者和手术团队必须通力合作,将核对表纳入常规工作流程,确保持续监控和支持,并培养安全文化,以改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Regional disparities, dynamic evolution, and convergence of China's resident health service development levels. Exploring sustainable leadership among first-line managers in healthcare: a qualitative study. Unravelling the implementation of the technical support from the provincial health administration to district health management teams in the democratic Republic of Congo: a realist evaluation. Systematic review of cost-effectiveness of Chinese PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Impact of helicopter emergency medical services base operating regime (24 h vs. 07:00-20:00) on mission volume and structure in Poland: a cross-sectional-longitudinal analysis with duty-time standardization (10 March-10 August 2025).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1