Factors affecting the retention of healthcare assistants in English mental health services: a qualitative interview study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-04-05 DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12665-1
Michaela Senek, Jaqui Long, Sally Ohlsen, Rachael Finn, Scott Weich, Tony Ryan, Emily Wood
{"title":"Factors affecting the retention of healthcare assistants in English mental health services: a qualitative interview study.","authors":"Michaela Senek, Jaqui Long, Sally Ohlsen, Rachael Finn, Scott Weich, Tony Ryan, Emily Wood","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12665-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the UK, healthcare assistants (HCAs) work alongside registered nurses and other clinicians to provide frontline clinical care. HCAs provide a considerable amount of essential direct patient care which, dependent on the setting, can include monitoring of temperature, pulse, respirations and ECGs, support with daily activities, emotional support and facilitating communication with other health professionals. In 2019, the leaver rate of HCAs and support workers in the UK was 13.4%. In many Trusts this was higher than the leaving rate for nurses. The aim of this study was to explore HCAs' experiences and their perceptions of the reasons for poor retention rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited HCAs from three English mental health Trusts. Recruitment information was circulated using a variety of approaches. 31 participants took part in semi-structured interviews. We explored the factors they considered to affect HCAs' decision to leave their role, and any differences they perceived with registered staff. Interviews were coded and analysed using the framework generated in a previous phase of the study which focused on retention of registered mental health professionals.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Three key factors impacted HCAs job satisfaction, wellbeing, and motivation to remain in post: (1) high workloads and unclear role boundaries creating stress and concerns for patient care; (2) good relationships with line managers and colleagues providing essential support to cope with both work and personal challenges; (3) feeling undervalued by the wider organisation, with a lack of investment including pay, facilities, and opportunities for development. These factors combined to create a situation of high stress and low job satisfaction, with many HCAs expressing an intention or desire to leave, particularly when the pay is similar to much less demanding jobs in other sectors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HCAs are a diverse group but many reported job dissatisfaction and feeling undervalued by the organisations they work for, with some struggling to cope with the cost-of-living crisis. Improved role boundaries, career pathways, and appreciation of the role such as reward and recognition schemes, could help retain this key staff group who provide a large proportion of essential patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"505"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12665-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the UK, healthcare assistants (HCAs) work alongside registered nurses and other clinicians to provide frontline clinical care. HCAs provide a considerable amount of essential direct patient care which, dependent on the setting, can include monitoring of temperature, pulse, respirations and ECGs, support with daily activities, emotional support and facilitating communication with other health professionals. In 2019, the leaver rate of HCAs and support workers in the UK was 13.4%. In many Trusts this was higher than the leaving rate for nurses. The aim of this study was to explore HCAs' experiences and their perceptions of the reasons for poor retention rates.

Methods: We recruited HCAs from three English mental health Trusts. Recruitment information was circulated using a variety of approaches. 31 participants took part in semi-structured interviews. We explored the factors they considered to affect HCAs' decision to leave their role, and any differences they perceived with registered staff. Interviews were coded and analysed using the framework generated in a previous phase of the study which focused on retention of registered mental health professionals.

Findings: Three key factors impacted HCAs job satisfaction, wellbeing, and motivation to remain in post: (1) high workloads and unclear role boundaries creating stress and concerns for patient care; (2) good relationships with line managers and colleagues providing essential support to cope with both work and personal challenges; (3) feeling undervalued by the wider organisation, with a lack of investment including pay, facilities, and opportunities for development. These factors combined to create a situation of high stress and low job satisfaction, with many HCAs expressing an intention or desire to leave, particularly when the pay is similar to much less demanding jobs in other sectors.

Conclusions: HCAs are a diverse group but many reported job dissatisfaction and feeling undervalued by the organisations they work for, with some struggling to cope with the cost-of-living crisis. Improved role boundaries, career pathways, and appreciation of the role such as reward and recognition schemes, could help retain this key staff group who provide a large proportion of essential patient care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响英国心理健康服务机构留住医护助理的因素:一项定性访谈研究。
背景:在英国,医护助理(HCA)与注册护士和其他临床医生一起提供一线临床护理。HCA 提供大量基本的直接病人护理,根据不同的环境,可包括体温、脉搏、呼吸和心电图监测、日常活动支持、情感支持以及促进与其他医疗专业人员的沟通。2019 年,英国 HCA 和辅助人员的离职率为 13.4%。在许多信托机构中,这一比例高于护士的离职率。本研究旨在探讨 HCA 的经验以及他们对留任率低的原因的看法:方法:我们从三家英国精神健康信托机构招募了 HCA。我们通过多种方式发布了招聘信息。31 名参与者参加了半结构化访谈。我们探讨了他们认为影响助理护士离职决定的因素,以及他们与注册员工之间的差异。我们使用前一阶段研究中生成的框架对访谈内容进行了编码和分析,该框架主要关注注册精神卫生专业人员的留任问题:有三个关键因素影响了 HCA 的工作满意度、幸福感和留任动机:(1)工作量大,角色界限不清,给病人护理工作带来压力和顾虑;(2)与直线经理和同事的良好关系为应对工作和个人挑战提供了必要的支持;(3)感觉被更广泛的组织低估了价值,缺乏投资,包括薪酬、设施和发展机会。这些因素结合在一起,造成了压力大、工作满意度低的局面,许多 HCA 表示有意或希望离开,尤其是当薪酬与其他部门要求低得多的工作相差无几时:助理护士是一个多样化的群体,但许多人表示对工作不满意,感觉自己的价值被所服务的机构低估,有些人还在努力应对生活费用危机。改善角色界限、职业发展途径以及对角色的认可(如奖励和认可计划)有助于留住这一关键员工群体,因为他们提供了大量重要的病人护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Regional disparities, dynamic evolution, and convergence of China's resident health service development levels. Exploring sustainable leadership among first-line managers in healthcare: a qualitative study. Unravelling the implementation of the technical support from the provincial health administration to district health management teams in the democratic Republic of Congo: a realist evaluation. Systematic review of cost-effectiveness of Chinese PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Impact of helicopter emergency medical services base operating regime (24 h vs. 07:00-20:00) on mission volume and structure in Poland: a cross-sectional-longitudinal analysis with duty-time standardization (10 March-10 August 2025).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1