Framework to guide the use of mathematical modelling in evidence-based policy decision-making.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-04-05 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093645
Jacquie Oliwa, Fatuma Hassan Guleid, Collins J Owek, Justinah Maluni, Juliet Jepkosgei, Jacinta Nzinga, Vincent O Were, So Yoon Sim, Abel W Walekhwa, Hannah Clapham, Saudamini Dabak, Sarin Kc, Liza Hadley, Eduardo Undurraga, Brittany L Hagedorn, Raymond Cw Hutubessy
{"title":"Framework to guide the use of mathematical modelling in evidence-based policy decision-making.","authors":"Jacquie Oliwa, Fatuma Hassan Guleid, Collins J Owek, Justinah Maluni, Juliet Jepkosgei, Jacinta Nzinga, Vincent O Were, So Yoon Sim, Abel W Walekhwa, Hannah Clapham, Saudamini Dabak, Sarin Kc, Liza Hadley, Eduardo Undurraga, Brittany L Hagedorn, Raymond Cw Hutubessy","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the significance of mathematical modelling in decision-making and the limited capacity in many low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Thus, we studied how modelling supported policy decision-making processes in LMICs during the pandemic (details in a separate paper).We found that strong researcher-policymaker relationships and co-creation facilitated knowledge translation, while scepticism, political pressures and demand for quick outputs were barriers. We also noted that routine use of modelled evidence for decision-making requires sustained funding, capacity building for policy-facing modelling, robust data infrastructure and dedicated knowledge translation mechanisms.These lessons helped us co-create a framework and policy roadmap for improving the routine use of modelling evidence in public health decision-making. This communication paper describes the framework components and provides an implementation approach and evidence for the recommendations. The components include (1) funding, (2) capacity building, (3) data infrastructure, (4) knowledge translation platforms and (5) a culture of evidence use.</p><p><strong>Key arguments: </strong>Our framework integrates the supply (modellers) and demand (policymakers) sides and contextual factors that enable change. It is designed to be generic and disease-agnostic for any policy decision-making that modelling could support. It is not a decision-making tool but a guiding framework to help build capacity for evidence-based policy decision-making. The target audience is modellers and policymakers, but it could include other partners and implementers in public health decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The framework was created through engagements with policymakers and researchers and reflects their real-life experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Its purpose is to guide stakeholders, especially in lower-resourced settings, in building modelling capacity, prioritising efforts and creating an enabling environment for using models as part of the evidence base to inform public health decision-making. To validate its robustness and impact, further work is needed to implement and evaluate this framework in diverse settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 4","pages":"e093645"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the significance of mathematical modelling in decision-making and the limited capacity in many low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Thus, we studied how modelling supported policy decision-making processes in LMICs during the pandemic (details in a separate paper).We found that strong researcher-policymaker relationships and co-creation facilitated knowledge translation, while scepticism, political pressures and demand for quick outputs were barriers. We also noted that routine use of modelled evidence for decision-making requires sustained funding, capacity building for policy-facing modelling, robust data infrastructure and dedicated knowledge translation mechanisms.These lessons helped us co-create a framework and policy roadmap for improving the routine use of modelling evidence in public health decision-making. This communication paper describes the framework components and provides an implementation approach and evidence for the recommendations. The components include (1) funding, (2) capacity building, (3) data infrastructure, (4) knowledge translation platforms and (5) a culture of evidence use.

Key arguments: Our framework integrates the supply (modellers) and demand (policymakers) sides and contextual factors that enable change. It is designed to be generic and disease-agnostic for any policy decision-making that modelling could support. It is not a decision-making tool but a guiding framework to help build capacity for evidence-based policy decision-making. The target audience is modellers and policymakers, but it could include other partners and implementers in public health decision-making.

Conclusion: The framework was created through engagements with policymakers and researchers and reflects their real-life experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Its purpose is to guide stakeholders, especially in lower-resourced settings, in building modelling capacity, prioritising efforts and creating an enabling environment for using models as part of the evidence base to inform public health decision-making. To validate its robustness and impact, further work is needed to implement and evaluate this framework in diverse settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指导在循证政策决策中使用数学建模的框架。
导言:2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了数学建模在决策中的重要性,以及许多低收入和中等收入国家的能力有限。因此,我们研究了建模如何在大流行期间支持中低收入国家的政策决策过程(详情见另一篇论文)。我们发现,强大的研究人员与决策者的关系和共同创造促进了知识转化,而怀疑主义、政治压力和对快速产出的需求则是障碍。我们还注意到,在决策中常规使用建模证据需要持续的资金、面向政策的建模能力建设、强大的数据基础设施和专门的知识转化机制。这些经验教训帮助我们共同创建了一个框架和政策路线图,以改进公共卫生决策中建模证据的常规使用。本交流文件描述了框架组件,并为建议提供了实现方法和证据。这些组成部分包括(1)资金,(2)能力建设,(3)数据基础设施,(4)知识翻译平台和(5)证据使用文化。关键论点:我们的框架整合了供给(建模者)和需求(决策者)方面以及促成变革的背景因素。它的设计是通用的,对建模可以支持的任何政策决策都是不可知的。它不是一个决策工具,而是一个指导框架,帮助建立以证据为基础的政策决策能力。目标受众是建模者和决策者,但也可以包括公共卫生决策中的其他合作伙伴和实施者。结论:该框架是通过与政策制定者和研究人员的接触而创建的,反映了他们在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的真实经历。其目的是指导利益攸关方,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中,建设建模能力,确定工作的优先次序,并创造有利的环境,以便将模型作为证据基础的一部分,为公共卫生决策提供信息。为了验证其稳健性和影响,需要进一步开展工作,在不同环境中实施和评估这一框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of school meals programmes on education, health and nutrition, social protection and agriculture in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol. Development, implementation, maintenance and impact of clinical academic career frameworks for healthcare professionals: a systematic review protocol. Burden of birth defects in a war and siege-affected region: a retrospective hospital-based cross-sectional study from Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia. Capacity building for ethical use of artificial intelligence in health: protocol for a scoping review of training initiatives and gaps in Africa. Development and validation of the Pressure Injury after Hospital Admission (PIAHA) screening tool for early assessment of hospital-acquired pressure injuries: a multiphase multicentre study protocol in acute care settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1