An additional rehabilitation program to improve postoperative outcomes in patients with rotator cuff tear and scapular dyskinesis: a propensity score-matched study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2025-04-05 DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08596-x
Jian-Ning Sun, Qun-Ya Zheng, Rui-Song Wang, Yun-Ru Ma, Peng Chen
{"title":"An additional rehabilitation program to improve postoperative outcomes in patients with rotator cuff tear and scapular dyskinesis: a propensity score-matched study.","authors":"Jian-Ning Sun, Qun-Ya Zheng, Rui-Song Wang, Yun-Ru Ma, Peng Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08596-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General scapular exercises have been included in traditional postoperative rehabilitation for rotator cuff tears, but patients with concomitant scapular dyskinesia do not have identical scapular muscle imbalances, and general scapular exercises make it difficult to improve scapular movement. We hypothesized that identifying weak scapular muscle groups and strengthening training would improve scapular movement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 60 rotator cuff tear patients with scapular dyskinesia were included in the study, 20 in the experimental group and 40 in the control group. Patients in the control group received traditional rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair, while patients in the experimental group performed additional selective scapular muscle rehabilitation exercises. Constant-Murley Score (CMS), shoulder mobility, VAS scores, SF-12 scores, and scapular motion were assessed in both groups at 16 weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 16-week follow-up, the experimental group showed better CMS (87.2 ± 4.4 vs. 83.9 ± 4.8) and shoulder anteflexion (137 ± 13.0 vs. 127.9 ± 12.2°) and abduction mobility (133.1 ± 15.4 vs. 121.4 ± 13.8°) compared to the control group. The experimental group had better improvements in scapular upward rotation (42.8 ± 11.7 vs. 35.3 ± 9.6°) and anterior tilt (12.9 ± 4.2 vs. 6.4 ± 2.0°) during shoulder anteflexion versus the control group. During shoulder abduction, the experimental group had better improvements in scapular anterior tilt (12.8 ± 3.3 vs. 9.1 ± 3.0°) versus the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides an additional exercise program targeting the scapular muscle groups for postoperative rehabilitation in rotator cuff tear patients with scapular dyskinesis. By identifying imbalanced muscles through electromyographic testing, and performing selective muscle strengthening exercises, better shoulder mobility and scapular motion performance can be achieved.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>(Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn ), ChiCTR2400087465, July 29, 2024, prospectively registered.).</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08596-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: General scapular exercises have been included in traditional postoperative rehabilitation for rotator cuff tears, but patients with concomitant scapular dyskinesia do not have identical scapular muscle imbalances, and general scapular exercises make it difficult to improve scapular movement. We hypothesized that identifying weak scapular muscle groups and strengthening training would improve scapular movement.

Methods: A total of 60 rotator cuff tear patients with scapular dyskinesia were included in the study, 20 in the experimental group and 40 in the control group. Patients in the control group received traditional rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair, while patients in the experimental group performed additional selective scapular muscle rehabilitation exercises. Constant-Murley Score (CMS), shoulder mobility, VAS scores, SF-12 scores, and scapular motion were assessed in both groups at 16 weeks postoperatively.

Results: At 16-week follow-up, the experimental group showed better CMS (87.2 ± 4.4 vs. 83.9 ± 4.8) and shoulder anteflexion (137 ± 13.0 vs. 127.9 ± 12.2°) and abduction mobility (133.1 ± 15.4 vs. 121.4 ± 13.8°) compared to the control group. The experimental group had better improvements in scapular upward rotation (42.8 ± 11.7 vs. 35.3 ± 9.6°) and anterior tilt (12.9 ± 4.2 vs. 6.4 ± 2.0°) during shoulder anteflexion versus the control group. During shoulder abduction, the experimental group had better improvements in scapular anterior tilt (12.8 ± 3.3 vs. 9.1 ± 3.0°) versus the control group.

Conclusions: This study provides an additional exercise program targeting the scapular muscle groups for postoperative rehabilitation in rotator cuff tear patients with scapular dyskinesis. By identifying imbalanced muscles through electromyographic testing, and performing selective muscle strengthening exercises, better shoulder mobility and scapular motion performance can be achieved.

Trial registration: (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn ), ChiCTR2400087465, July 29, 2024, prospectively registered.).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善肩袖撕裂和肩胛运动障碍患者术后效果的附加康复计划:倾向评分匹配研究。
背景:一般的肩胛骨运动已纳入传统的肩袖撕裂术后康复,但伴有肩胛骨运动障碍的患者肩胛骨肌不平衡并不相同,一般的肩胛骨运动难以改善肩胛骨运动。我们假设识别弱肩胛骨肌群并加强训练可以改善肩胛骨运动。方法:选取60例肩袖撕裂伴肩胛骨运动障碍患者作为研究对象,实验组20例,对照组40例。对照组患者在肩袖修复后接受传统的康复治疗,而实验组患者则进行额外的选择性肩胛肌康复训练。在术后16周对两组患者进行Constant-Murley评分(CMS)、肩关节活动度、VAS评分、SF-12评分和肩胛骨活动度评估。结果:随访16周,实验组CMS(87.2±4.4比83.9±4.8)、前屈度(137±13.0比127.9±12.2°)、外展活动度(133.1±15.4比121.4±13.8°)均优于对照组。与对照组相比,实验组在前屈肩胛骨向上旋转(42.8±11.7°对35.3±9.6°)和前倾(12.9±4.2°对6.4±2.0°)方面有更好的改善。在肩关节外展时,实验组肩胛骨前倾(12.8±3.3°比9.1±3.0°)较对照组有更好的改善。结论:本研究为肩胛骨运动障碍的肩袖撕裂患者术后康复提供了一种针对肩胛骨肌群的额外锻炼方案。通过肌电图测试识别不平衡肌肉,并进行选择性肌肉强化训练,可以获得更好的肩部活动能力和肩胛骨运动表现。试验注册:(中国临床试验注册中心(https://www.chictr.org.cn), ChiCTR2400087465, 2024年7月29日,前瞻性注册。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Effect of core stabilization exercises on lumbar multifidus morphology and functional outcomes in chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Shoulder kinematic and muscle recruitment pattern changes in upper trapezius myofascial trigger points: a controlled observational study. Intramedullary and extramedullary tibial alignment guides applied to each knee of the same patient resulted in no significant differences in radiological or clinical outcomes. Risk factors and a predictive nomogram for nonunion following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Transformer-based and CNN-based models for clinically effective 2D and 3D pelvic bone segmentation in CT imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1