The impact of end-stage kidney disease on hospitalization outcomes in patients with complete heart block: insights from united states population data.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Urology and Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-05 DOI:10.1007/s11255-025-04474-6
Nadhem Abdallah, Abdilahi Mohamoud, Mahmoud Ismayl, Ammar Aladaileh, Charles A Herzog
{"title":"The impact of end-stage kidney disease on hospitalization outcomes in patients with complete heart block: insights from united states population data.","authors":"Nadhem Abdallah, Abdilahi Mohamoud, Mahmoud Ismayl, Ammar Aladaileh, Charles A Herzog","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04474-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) suffer higher rates of mortality, partly because of cardiac conduction abnormalities. Despite this, data on complete heart block (CHB) cases in patients with ESKD remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Admissions for CHB were identified in the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample. In-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with and without ESKD. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included, Permanent Pacemaker (PPM) and Temporary Pacemaker (TPM) use, palliative care, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation use, length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150,265 hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of CHB, 5,109 (3.4%) had a diagnosis of ESKD. ESKD was associated with higher odds of mortality (adjusted Odds Ration [aOR] 1.54, 95% CI 1.15-2.07), vasopressors use (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.25-2.88), mechanical ventilation (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.56), palliative care (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.03-1.94), TPM use (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09-1.47), lower odds of PPM use (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47-0.62), longer LOS (+ 1.29 days, p < 0.001) and higher charges ($123,110 vs. $87,235, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with ESKD admitted for CHB had higher fatal and non-fatal adverse outcomes compared to patients without ESKD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"3009-3018"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04474-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) suffer higher rates of mortality, partly because of cardiac conduction abnormalities. Despite this, data on complete heart block (CHB) cases in patients with ESKD remain limited.

Methods: Admissions for CHB were identified in the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample. In-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with and without ESKD. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included, Permanent Pacemaker (PPM) and Temporary Pacemaker (TPM) use, palliative care, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation use, length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for confounders.

Results: Among 150,265 hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of CHB, 5,109 (3.4%) had a diagnosis of ESKD. ESKD was associated with higher odds of mortality (adjusted Odds Ration [aOR] 1.54, 95% CI 1.15-2.07), vasopressors use (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.25-2.88), mechanical ventilation (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.56), palliative care (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.03-1.94), TPM use (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09-1.47), lower odds of PPM use (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47-0.62), longer LOS (+ 1.29 days, p < 0.001) and higher charges ($123,110 vs. $87,235, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients with ESKD admitted for CHB had higher fatal and non-fatal adverse outcomes compared to patients without ESKD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
终末期肾病对完全性心脏传导阻滞患者住院治疗结果的影响:美国人口数据的启示。
终末期肾病(ESKD)患者的死亡率较高,部分原因是心脏传导异常。尽管如此,ESKD患者完全性心脏传导阻滞(CHB)病例的数据仍然有限。方法:从2016-2019年全国住院患者样本中确定CHB入院情况。比较了ESKD患者和非ESKD患者的住院结果。主要结局是死亡率。次要结果包括永久性起搏器(PPM)和临时起搏器(TPM)的使用、姑息治疗、血管加压剂的使用、机械通气的使用、住院时间(LOS)和总费用。多变量回归模型用于校正混杂因素。结果:在150265例初步诊断为慢性乙型肝炎的住院患者中,5109例(3.4%)诊断为ESKD。ESKD与较高的死亡率(调整比值比[aOR] 1.54, 95% CI 1.15-2.07)、血管加压剂的使用(aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.25-2.88)、机械通气(aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.56)、姑息治疗(aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.03-1.94)、TPM的使用(aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09-1.47)、较低的PPM使用几率(aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47-0.62)、较长的LOS(+ 1.29天,p)相关。结论:与没有ESKD的患者相比,ESKD患者因CHB入院的致命和非致命不良结局更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor: Bone disease in kidney transplant: don't forget about osteomalacia: a case report and literature review. Reflections on the methodological rigor and unaddressed factors of music therapy in hemodialysis patients. Letter to the Editor: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease is not a risk factor for scoliosis. Reply to letter to the editor: effect of resveratrol on the renal cell morphology in acute restraint stress‑induced male adult Wistar albino rat model, a pilot study. Response to comment on "Mortality trends of renal diseases due to hypertension in adults: an analysis of gender, race, place of death and geographical disparities in the United States from 1999 to 2020".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1