Personality, eating behaviour, and body weight: results from the population study of women in Gothenburg 2016/17

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM International Journal of Obesity Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1038/s41366-025-01764-y
Lena Farhan, Dominique Hange, Tore Hällström, Cecilia Björkelund, Lauren Lissner, Lisbeth Stahre, Kirsten Mehlig
{"title":"Personality, eating behaviour, and body weight: results from the population study of women in Gothenburg 2016/17","authors":"Lena Farhan, Dominique Hange, Tore Hällström, Cecilia Björkelund, Lauren Lissner, Lisbeth Stahre, Kirsten Mehlig","doi":"10.1038/s41366-025-01764-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim was to investigate the cross-sectional associations between personality traits, psychogenic needs and eating behaviour, and to describe the extent to which personality influences the association between eating behaviour and weight status. In 2016/17, a population-based sample of 573 women in Gothenburg, Sweden aged either 38 or 50 participated in a health examination. They completed the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, measuring uncontrolled eating, emotional eating and cognitive restraint on a scale of zero to 100. Scores higher than 50 defined excessive eating behaviour. The Cesarec-Marke Personality Schedule was used to measure psychogenic needs, characterised by pursuits and objectives that define personality and influence actions. Extraversion and neuroticism were assessed using the Eysenck-Personality Inventory. Regression models for excessive eating behaviour and for logarithmic body mass index (BMI) as a function of standardised personality scores were adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle and health factors. A higher need to defend one’s status (DST) was positively associated with excessive uncontrolled eating, odds ratio (OR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval = (1.11, 1.86) per standard deviation (SD) of DST. The need to defend one’s status was more strongly associated with excessive emotional eating, OR = 1.61 (1.18, 2.20) than neuroticism, OR = 1.45 (1.06, 1.97), in a mutually adjusted model. Needs for achievement and autonomy were associated with excessive cognitive restraint, OR = 1.39 (1.09, 1.76) and 0.78 (0.62, 0.97), respectively. Excessive emotional eating was associated with 5.3 (1.1, 9.6) % higher values of BMI when adjusted for the need of DST, which was associated with −2.7 (−4.1, −1.3) % lower BMI per SD. Psychogenic needs were more closely associated with eating behaviour than personality traits. A lower need to defend one’s status and excessive emotional eating were independently associated with higher BMI, suggesting different pathways to obesity and treatment strategies.","PeriodicalId":14183,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Obesity","volume":"49 7","pages":"1272-1279"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41366-025-01764-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim was to investigate the cross-sectional associations between personality traits, psychogenic needs and eating behaviour, and to describe the extent to which personality influences the association between eating behaviour and weight status. In 2016/17, a population-based sample of 573 women in Gothenburg, Sweden aged either 38 or 50 participated in a health examination. They completed the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, measuring uncontrolled eating, emotional eating and cognitive restraint on a scale of zero to 100. Scores higher than 50 defined excessive eating behaviour. The Cesarec-Marke Personality Schedule was used to measure psychogenic needs, characterised by pursuits and objectives that define personality and influence actions. Extraversion and neuroticism were assessed using the Eysenck-Personality Inventory. Regression models for excessive eating behaviour and for logarithmic body mass index (BMI) as a function of standardised personality scores were adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle and health factors. A higher need to defend one’s status (DST) was positively associated with excessive uncontrolled eating, odds ratio (OR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval = (1.11, 1.86) per standard deviation (SD) of DST. The need to defend one’s status was more strongly associated with excessive emotional eating, OR = 1.61 (1.18, 2.20) than neuroticism, OR = 1.45 (1.06, 1.97), in a mutually adjusted model. Needs for achievement and autonomy were associated with excessive cognitive restraint, OR = 1.39 (1.09, 1.76) and 0.78 (0.62, 0.97), respectively. Excessive emotional eating was associated with 5.3 (1.1, 9.6) % higher values of BMI when adjusted for the need of DST, which was associated with −2.7 (−4.1, −1.3) % lower BMI per SD. Psychogenic needs were more closely associated with eating behaviour than personality traits. A lower need to defend one’s status and excessive emotional eating were independently associated with higher BMI, suggesting different pathways to obesity and treatment strategies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个性、饮食行为和体重:2016/17年哥德堡妇女人口研究结果。
目的:目的是调查人格特质、心理需求和饮食行为之间的横断面关联,并描述人格在多大程度上影响饮食行为和体重状况之间的关联。方法:2016/17年,在瑞典哥德堡以人群为基础的573名年龄在38岁或50岁之间的女性参加了健康检查。他们完成了“三因素饮食问卷”,以0到100的分值衡量不受控制的饮食、情绪化的饮食和认知克制。得分超过50分被定义为过度饮食行为。cesarec - markpersonality Schedule被用来测量心理需求,其特点是追求和目标定义了个性并影响了行为。使用艾森克人格量表评估外向性和神经质。过度饮食行为的回归模型和作为标准化人格分数函数的对数体重指数(BMI)根据社会人口统计学、生活方式和健康因素进行了调整。结果:较高的身份保护需求(DST)与过度不受控制的饮食呈正相关,DST的比值比(OR) = 1.44, 95%可信区间=(1.11,1.86)/标准差。在一个相互调整的模型中,捍卫自己地位的需要与过度情绪化饮食的相关性更强,OR = 1.61(1.18, 2.20),而神经质的OR = 1.45(1.06, 1.97)。成就需要和自主需要与过度认知约束相关,OR分别为1.39(1.09,1.76)和0.78(0.62,0.97)。过度情绪化进食与BMI值升高5.3(1.1,9.6)%(经DST需求调整)相关,与BMI值每SD降低-2.7(-4.1,-1.3)%相关。结论:心理需求与饮食行为的关系比与人格特质的关系更密切。较低的捍卫自己地位的需求和过度的情绪化饮食与较高的BMI独立相关,这表明肥胖的不同途径和治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Obesity
International Journal of Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obesity is a multi-disciplinary forum for research describing basic, clinical and applied studies in biochemistry, physiology, genetics and nutrition, molecular, metabolic, psychological and epidemiological aspects of obesity and related disorders. We publish a range of content types including original research articles, technical reports, reviews, correspondence and brief communications that elaborate on significant advances in the field and cover topical issues.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics and survival in sarcopenic obesity defined by the Japanese working group on sarcopenic obesity criteria versus existing definitions in older adults: findings from the Otassha study. A sequential deep learning model for predicting people with obesity in adults aged 18-64 using physical fitness variables. Associations between dietary glycemic and insulinemic patterns and eating behavior in adults: a cluster-based analysis. Weight loss independent outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus and other metabolic comorbidities after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Association of body mass index, waist circumference, (abdominal) overweight and obesity with sex- and age-specific cognitive function over time-the Doetinchem Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1