Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale in Brazil.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1055/a-2561-0810
Fernanda Lopes, Mary Uchiyama Nakamura, Edward Araujo Júnior, Roseli Mieko Yamamoto Nomura
{"title":"Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale in Brazil.","authors":"Fernanda Lopes, Mary Uchiyama Nakamura, Edward Araujo Júnior, Roseli Mieko Yamamoto Nomura","doi":"10.1055/a-2561-0810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To examine the psychometric properties of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale (MCSRS), previously translated and adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. A methodological and cross-sectional study with data collected at a low-risk maternity hospital, period of 2017 and 2018. The inclusion criteria were early postpartum, maternal age between 18 and 34 years, birth of a live infant, and birth over 36 weeks' gestation. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the MCSRS with 34 items in six subscales (self, partner, baby, nurse, physicians, and overall childbirth satisfaction) was administered in a face-to-face interview. Psychometric analyses assessed internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) examined dimensionality. The population included 411 participants. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated a good fitness for the model, comparative fit index (CFI) and goodness-of-fit index (GFI)=0.99; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) (0.07; 95% CI 0.07-0.08); incremental fit index (IFI) and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)=0.99, which confirmed the six subscales identified in the original scale. The factorial loads of the items were all above 0.70. For the questionnaire's overall reliability, Cronbach's alpha was 0.96 and McDonald's omega was 0.97. The MCSRS is a valid instrument, being that all subscales had good reliability indexes. CFA inclusion criteria also encompassed women who underwent an unplanned cesarean section, thus extending the use of the MCSRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","volume":" ","pages":"268-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2561-0810","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To examine the psychometric properties of the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale (MCSRS), previously translated and adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. A methodological and cross-sectional study with data collected at a low-risk maternity hospital, period of 2017 and 2018. The inclusion criteria were early postpartum, maternal age between 18 and 34 years, birth of a live infant, and birth over 36 weeks' gestation. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the MCSRS with 34 items in six subscales (self, partner, baby, nurse, physicians, and overall childbirth satisfaction) was administered in a face-to-face interview. Psychometric analyses assessed internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) examined dimensionality. The population included 411 participants. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated a good fitness for the model, comparative fit index (CFI) and goodness-of-fit index (GFI)=0.99; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) (0.07; 95% CI 0.07-0.08); incremental fit index (IFI) and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)=0.99, which confirmed the six subscales identified in the original scale. The factorial loads of the items were all above 0.70. For the questionnaire's overall reliability, Cronbach's alpha was 0.96 and McDonald's omega was 0.97. The MCSRS is a valid instrument, being that all subscales had good reliability indexes. CFA inclusion criteria also encompassed women who underwent an unplanned cesarean section, thus extending the use of the MCSRS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西麦基分娩满意度评定量表的验证性因素分析。
为了检验麦基分娩满意度评定量表(MCSRS)的心理测量特性,该量表已被翻译并改编为巴西葡萄牙语。对2017年至2018年期间在一家低风险妇产医院收集的数据进行方法学和横断面研究。纳入标准为产后早期,母亲年龄在18 - 34岁之间,出生一名活婴,妊娠超过36周。巴西葡萄牙语版的MCSRS采用面对面访谈的方式,包含6个分量表(自我、伴侣、婴儿、护士、医生和整体分娩满意度)34个项目。心理测量分析使用Cronbach's alpha和McDonald's omega评估内部一致性,验证性因子分析(CFA)检查维度。总共有411名参与者。验证性因子分析(CFA)表明模型适合度较好,比较拟合指数(CFI)和拟合优度指数(GFI)=0.99;均方根近似误差(RMSEA) (0.07;95% ci 0.07-0.08);增量拟合指数(IFI)和Tucker-Lewis指数(TLI)=0.99,证实了原量表中确定的六个子量表。项目的阶乘负荷均在0.70以上。问卷的整体信度Cronbach’s alpha为0.96,McDonald’s omega为0.97。MCSRS量表具有良好的信度指标,是一种有效的量表。CFA纳入标准还包括接受计划外剖宫产的妇女,从而扩大了MCSRS的使用范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynäkologen, Geburtshelfer, Hebammen, Neonatologen, Pädiater
期刊最新文献
Differential Analysis of Neonatal Adverse Drug Events from Intrauterine and Extrauterine Exposure: Insights into Administration Routes Using the FAERS Database. [The possible impact of the COVID-19 lockdown measures on the perinatal/neonatal outcome - a data analysis of the years 2019, 2020, 2021]. Antenatal course and clinical outcomes of fetal intra-abdominal cystic lesions: a single tertiary center experience. The Effect of Mandala Art Therapy on Anxiety, Mood, and Plasma Glucose Levels in Pregnant Women with Abnormal OGTT Values: A Randomized Controlled Study. Methylene Blue for Refractory Shock in A Neonate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1