Improving the quality of surgical morbidity and mortality conference using a standardized reporting and assessment tool: a validation study from a large academic medical center in the United States.

IF 2.1 Q1 SURGERY Patient Safety in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1186/s13037-025-00433-3
Sarah M Dermody, Marc C Thorne, Robert J Morrison
{"title":"Improving the quality of surgical morbidity and mortality conference using a standardized reporting and assessment tool: a validation study from a large academic medical center in the United States.","authors":"Sarah M Dermody, Marc C Thorne, Robert J Morrison","doi":"10.1186/s13037-025-00433-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study is two-fold: (1) Improve the quality of Morbidity and Mortality conferences by developing a standardized presentation template and assessment tool; (2) Assess the intervention impact by comparing pre- and post-intervention data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post study was conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center between January 2022- January 2023. A standardized presentation template was created and a short assessment tool was developed to evaluate the quality of presentations on eight domains. We hypothesized that development of this template would significantly improve the quality of M&M conferences. Pre- and post-intervention data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test to evaluate for significant differences. Effect sizes for each domain were assessed by Cohen's d.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 127 pre-intervention responses and 61 post-intervention responses were received over a six-month period. Statistically significant increases in post-intervention scores were noted in nearly all presentation domains, including clarity of case selection rationale, nature of the safety event, circumstances leading to the safety event, contributing factors, understanding of the safety event, and anticipated benefits to patient outcomes (p < 0.05). The effect sizes ranged from medium for rationale for case selection to small for the identification of corrective actions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of a standardized, guided template improved the quality of Morbidity and Mortality presentations, with medium effect sizes and statistically significant increases in nearly all surveyed domains. A ceiling effect in the overall assessment score was noted as presentations prior to the intervention were rated highly. Standardization of case selection and presentations can promote alignment of the Quality Improvement Morbidity and Mortality workflow with broader-scope initiatives, departmentally and institutionally.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-025-00433-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is two-fold: (1) Improve the quality of Morbidity and Mortality conferences by developing a standardized presentation template and assessment tool; (2) Assess the intervention impact by comparing pre- and post-intervention data.

Methods: A pre-post study was conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center between January 2022- January 2023. A standardized presentation template was created and a short assessment tool was developed to evaluate the quality of presentations on eight domains. We hypothesized that development of this template would significantly improve the quality of M&M conferences. Pre- and post-intervention data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test to evaluate for significant differences. Effect sizes for each domain were assessed by Cohen's d.

Results: A total of 127 pre-intervention responses and 61 post-intervention responses were received over a six-month period. Statistically significant increases in post-intervention scores were noted in nearly all presentation domains, including clarity of case selection rationale, nature of the safety event, circumstances leading to the safety event, contributing factors, understanding of the safety event, and anticipated benefits to patient outcomes (p < 0.05). The effect sizes ranged from medium for rationale for case selection to small for the identification of corrective actions.

Conclusions: The introduction of a standardized, guided template improved the quality of Morbidity and Mortality presentations, with medium effect sizes and statistically significant increases in nearly all surveyed domains. A ceiling effect in the overall assessment score was noted as presentations prior to the intervention were rated highly. Standardization of case selection and presentations can promote alignment of the Quality Improvement Morbidity and Mortality workflow with broader-scope initiatives, departmentally and institutionally.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用标准化报告和评估工具提高外科发病率和死亡率会议的质量:来自美国一家大型学术医疗中心的验证研究。
背景:本研究有两个目的:(1)通过开发标准化演示模板和评估工具,提高发病率和死亡率会议的质量;(2)通过比较干预前后的数据,评估干预效果:方法:2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间,在一家三级护理学术医疗中心开展了一项前后期研究。我们创建了一个标准化的演示模板,并开发了一个简短的评估工具,用于评估八个领域的演示质量。我们假设该模板的开发将显著提高 M&M 会议的质量。我们使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较了干预前后的数据,以评估是否存在显著差异。每个领域的效应大小通过 Cohen's d 进行评估:在为期六个月的时间里,共收到 127 份干预前回复和 61 份干预后回复。在几乎所有的陈述领域,包括病例选择理由的清晰度、安全事件的性质、导致安全事件的情况、诱因、对安全事件的理解以及对患者预后的预期益处,干预后的得分都有统计学意义上的大幅提高(P 结论):采用标准化指导模板提高了发病率和死亡率报告的质量,效果中等,几乎在所有调查领域都有统计学意义上的显著提高。由于干预前的病例介绍得到了很高的评价,因此总体评估得分出现了天花板效应。病例选择和演示的标准化可促进发病率和死亡率质量改进工作流程与更广泛的部门和机构计划保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development and evaluation of a novel voice-enabled prototype to support consistent application of surgical safety checklists: a proof-of-concept study. Surgical interruptions and preventable delays in the operating rooms of academic teaching hospitals. Retained fragmented Raytec gauze eluding an alleged correct postoperative count following cardiothoracic surgery: case report of a rare "never event". Impact of opioid use disorder as a safety risk in elective total hip arthroplasty: an imperative for routine preoperative screening. Awake sigmoidectomy under continuous spinal anesthesia in a high-risk ASA class V patient: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1