Cementless Hemiarthroplasty Complication Risk Does Not Support Contemporary Utilization Patterns

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.067
Robert A. Burnett MD, Anne J. Hakim MD, Brenna E. Blackburn PhD, Michael J. Archibeck MD, Lucas A. Anderson MD, Jeremy M. Gililland MD
{"title":"Cementless Hemiarthroplasty Complication Risk Does Not Support Contemporary Utilization Patterns","authors":"Robert A. Burnett MD,&nbsp;Anne J. Hakim MD,&nbsp;Brenna E. Blackburn PhD,&nbsp;Michael J. Archibeck MD,&nbsp;Lucas A. Anderson MD,&nbsp;Jeremy M. Gililland MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is commonly performed in the setting of femoral neck fracture to allow for early mobilization. Fixation of the femoral component can be either press fit or cemented. The purpose of this study was to compare cemented and cementless HA utilization and complications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicenter retrospective analysis was performed on hip fracture patients from 2010 to 2019. The primary outcome of this study was revision due to periprosthetic fracture. Secondary outcomes included operative time, surgical complications, and mortality. Logistic regression was performed to compare the risk of various complications, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidity status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During this time period, cementless HA (577, 58.6%) was more commonly performed than cemented HA (407, 41.4%). There was a trend toward increasing cemented fixation over the study period (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Cementless HA patients were younger (77 versus 81, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and had shorter operative times (90.5 ± 35.7 versus 105.0 ± 38.7 minutes, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). However, cementless HA patients were less likely to return to independent ambulation (8.2 versus 19.2%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), more likely to undergo revision surgery for periprosthetic fracture (2.6 versus 0.3%, <em>P</em> = 0.0035; odds ratio [OR] 11.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43 to 85.38), <em>P</em> = 0.021), and had higher dislocation rates (6.1 versus 2.7%, <em>P</em> = 0.014; OR 2.29 (CI 1.13 to 4.67), <em>P</em> = 0.022). Periprosthetic joint infection rates were comparable between groups (4.0 versus 4.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.48; OR 0.71 (CI 0.38 to 1.36), <em>P</em> = 0.31). The 90-day mortality was lower with cementless HA (10.8 versus 19.2%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), though mortality rates were comparable at the final follow-up (OR 1.23 [CI 0.94 to 1.62], <em>P</em> = 0.13).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The surgical complication risk of cementless HA for femoral neck fracture is higher than cemented HA, with an 11-fold increased risk of periprosthetic fracture compared to cemented HA. Surgeons may consider routine use of cemented fixation for hemiarthroplasties performed for femoral neck fractures to mitigate the risk of fracture and need for further surgical intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":"40 8","pages":"Pages S78-S83"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540325003043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is commonly performed in the setting of femoral neck fracture to allow for early mobilization. Fixation of the femoral component can be either press fit or cemented. The purpose of this study was to compare cemented and cementless HA utilization and complications.

Methods

A multicenter retrospective analysis was performed on hip fracture patients from 2010 to 2019. The primary outcome of this study was revision due to periprosthetic fracture. Secondary outcomes included operative time, surgical complications, and mortality. Logistic regression was performed to compare the risk of various complications, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidity status.

Results

During this time period, cementless HA (577, 58.6%) was more commonly performed than cemented HA (407, 41.4%). There was a trend toward increasing cemented fixation over the study period (P < 0.001). Cementless HA patients were younger (77 versus 81, P < 0.001) and had shorter operative times (90.5 ± 35.7 versus 105.0 ± 38.7 minutes, P < 0.001). However, cementless HA patients were less likely to return to independent ambulation (8.2 versus 19.2%, P < 0.001), more likely to undergo revision surgery for periprosthetic fracture (2.6 versus 0.3%, P = 0.0035; odds ratio [OR] 11.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43 to 85.38), P = 0.021), and had higher dislocation rates (6.1 versus 2.7%, P = 0.014; OR 2.29 (CI 1.13 to 4.67), P = 0.022). Periprosthetic joint infection rates were comparable between groups (4.0 versus 4.9%, P = 0.48; OR 0.71 (CI 0.38 to 1.36), P = 0.31). The 90-day mortality was lower with cementless HA (10.8 versus 19.2%, P < 0.001), though mortality rates were comparable at the final follow-up (OR 1.23 [CI 0.94 to 1.62], P = 0.13).

Conclusions

The surgical complication risk of cementless HA for femoral neck fracture is higher than cemented HA, with an 11-fold increased risk of periprosthetic fracture compared to cemented HA. Surgeons may consider routine use of cemented fixation for hemiarthroplasties performed for femoral neck fractures to mitigate the risk of fracture and need for further surgical intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无骨水泥半关节置换术并发症风险不支持当代应用模式。
引言:半关节置换术(HA)通常在股骨颈骨折的情况下进行,以便早期活动。股骨假体的固定可以采用压合或骨水泥。本研究的目的是比较骨水泥和非骨水泥半关节置换术的应用和并发症。方法:对2010 - 2019年髋部骨折患者进行多中心回顾性分析。这项研究的主要结果是由于假体周围骨折而进行翻修。次要结局包括手术时间、手术并发症和死亡率。采用Logistic回归比较各种并发症的风险,调整年龄、性别、体重指数和合并症状况。结果:在此期间,无骨水泥HA(5777例,58.6%)比骨水泥HA(407例,41.4%)更常见。在研究期间,骨水泥固定有增加的趋势(P < 0.001)。无骨水泥HA患者更年轻(77 vs 81, P < 0.001),手术时间更短(90.5±35.7 vs 105.0±38.7分钟,P < 0.001)。然而,无骨水泥HA患者不太可能恢复独立行走(8.2比19.2%,P < 0.001),更可能接受假体周围骨折翻修手术(2.6比0.3%,P = 0.0035;OR[优势比]11.06,95% CI[置信区间]1.43 ~ 85.38),P = 0.021),脱位率较高(6.1比2.7%,P = 0.014;OR 2.29 (CI 1.13 ~ 4.67), P = 0.022)。两组间假体周围关节感染率具有可比性(4.0 vs 4.9%, P = 0.48;OR 0.71 (CI 0.38 ~ 1.36), P = 0.31)。无骨水泥HA的90天死亡率较低(10.8% vs . 19.2%, P < 0.001),但最终随访时的死亡率相当(OR 1.23 (CI 0.94 ~ 1.62), P = 0.13)。结论:股骨颈骨折无骨水泥半关节置换术的手术并发症风险高于骨水泥,假体周围骨折的风险是骨水泥半关节置换术的11倍。外科医生可能会考虑在股骨颈骨折半关节置换术中常规使用骨水泥固定,以降低骨折的风险和进一步手术干预的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
期刊最新文献
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Periprosthetic Joint Infection Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Agreement of Patient Responses Between Electronic- and Paper- Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Complications and Readmissions Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study. Failure Incidence and Predictors Following Manipulation Under Anesthesia for the Stiff Total Knee Arthroplasty. Repeat Exposure to Silver-impregnated Dressing Does Not Increase Risk of Allergic Contact Dermatitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1