Age-Specific Socioeconomic Inequalities in Treatment in Patients with Stage III Colon Cancer in England 2012–2016: A Population-Based Study with Mediation Analysis

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2025.103799
B. Kells, B. Rachet, S. Ling
{"title":"Age-Specific Socioeconomic Inequalities in Treatment in Patients with Stage III Colon Cancer in England 2012–2016: A Population-Based Study with Mediation Analysis","authors":"B. Kells,&nbsp;B. Rachet,&nbsp;S. Ling","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2025.103799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>It is unclear whether inequalities in guidelines-recommended treatment among patients with stage III colon cancer existed and differed by age in England.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Using data from cancer registry in England between 2012 and 2016, we included all patients with stage III colon cancer and applied multivariable multinominal logistic regression, including an interaction between age and deprivation, to investigate age-specific socioeconomic inequalities in receipt of the NICE-recommend treatment – surgery combined with adjuvant chemotherapy. We also examined the mediating roles of tumour factors on the inequalities in treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 20,368 included patients, socioeconomic inequalities in receipt of the NICE-recommend treatment were observed at all ages but wider in patients aged between 65 and 85 years old. For a 70-year-old patient, the probability of receiving the NICE-recommend treatment was 70.8% (95% CI: 68.6, 73.1) for the least vs. 59.4% (53.7, 65.1) for the most deprived quintile. When both groups were unlikely to receive the NICE-recommended treatment (85+ years old), patients from less deprived areas had a higher probability of receiving some alternative treatments like surgery while those with the most deprived backgrounds received none. Tumour factors explained little of inequalities in receipt of surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients from deprived areas tended to receive inferior treatment options, and tumour factors explained little of these inequalities. Guidelines need to ensure that the NICE-recommended treatment modality is available to all to reduce the survival gap.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 103799"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655525000548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

It is unclear whether inequalities in guidelines-recommended treatment among patients with stage III colon cancer existed and differed by age in England.

Materials and methods

Using data from cancer registry in England between 2012 and 2016, we included all patients with stage III colon cancer and applied multivariable multinominal logistic regression, including an interaction between age and deprivation, to investigate age-specific socioeconomic inequalities in receipt of the NICE-recommend treatment – surgery combined with adjuvant chemotherapy. We also examined the mediating roles of tumour factors on the inequalities in treatment.

Results

Among 20,368 included patients, socioeconomic inequalities in receipt of the NICE-recommend treatment were observed at all ages but wider in patients aged between 65 and 85 years old. For a 70-year-old patient, the probability of receiving the NICE-recommend treatment was 70.8% (95% CI: 68.6, 73.1) for the least vs. 59.4% (53.7, 65.1) for the most deprived quintile. When both groups were unlikely to receive the NICE-recommended treatment (85+ years old), patients from less deprived areas had a higher probability of receiving some alternative treatments like surgery while those with the most deprived backgrounds received none. Tumour factors explained little of inequalities in receipt of surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Patients from deprived areas tended to receive inferior treatment options, and tumour factors explained little of these inequalities. Guidelines need to ensure that the NICE-recommended treatment modality is available to all to reduce the survival gap.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2012-2016年英国III期结肠癌患者治疗中的年龄特异性社会经济不平等:一项基于人群的研究与中介分析
目的:目前尚不清楚在英国III期结肠癌患者中是否存在指南推荐治疗的不平等,以及是否存在年龄差异。材料和方法使用2012年至2016年英国癌症登记处的数据,我们纳入了所有III期结肠癌患者,并应用多变量多项逻辑回归,包括年龄和剥夺之间的相互作用,以调查接受nice推荐的治疗-手术联合辅助化疗的年龄特异性社会经济不平等。我们还研究了肿瘤因素对治疗不平等的中介作用。结果在纳入的20,368例患者中,接受nice推荐治疗的社会经济不平等现象在所有年龄段都存在,但在65至85岁的患者中更为普遍。对于一名70岁的患者,接受nice推荐的治疗的概率在最少的五分位数中为70.8% (95% CI: 68.6, 73.1),而在最贫困的五分位数中为59.4%(53.7,65.1)。当两组都不太可能接受nice推荐的治疗(85岁以上)时,来自贫困地区的患者更有可能接受手术等替代治疗,而那些背景最贫困的患者则没有接受任何治疗。肿瘤因素几乎不能解释接受手术或辅助化疗的不平等。结论贫困地区的患者往往接受较差的治疗方案,肿瘤因素对这种不平等的解释很小。指南需要确保nice推荐的治疗方式适用于所有人,以缩小生存差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical oncology
Clinical oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
332
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Extracranial Oligometastatic Pancreatobiliary Cancer Defining the Clinical Target Volume in Postoperative Thymic Epithelial Tumours - A Clinical Practice Guide for UK Clinical Oncologists Authors' Response to the Letter Titled: Enhancing Treatment Resilience in Palliative Oesophago-Gastric Cancer: Nutritional, Access, and Scoring Considerations Navigating Disappearing Liver Metastases in Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Surgical and Non-Surgical Approaches Intraocular Sarcomas: A Population-based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1