Validity evidence of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener - Teacher Rating Scale: A systematic review & quantitative synthesis

IF 4.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101449
Annie Goerdt , Faith G. Miller , Danielle Dupuis , Anna Li , Jenna Rausch
{"title":"Validity evidence of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener - Teacher Rating Scale: A systematic review & quantitative synthesis","authors":"Annie Goerdt ,&nbsp;Faith G. Miller ,&nbsp;Danielle Dupuis ,&nbsp;Anna Li ,&nbsp;Jenna Rausch","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Early identification of student social, emotional, and behavioral (SEB) concerns is vital to prevent and ameliorate future difficulties. Yet, assessment practices rely on sound validity arguments to accurately identify students who may benefit from support. As the strength of a validity argument relies on the extent of validity evidence, the synthesis of evidence may facilitate appropriate use and interpretation. Therefore, this systematic review synthesized peer-reviewed empirical studies and unpublished dissertations and theses of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener - Teacher Rating Scale (SAEBRS-TRS) conducted in educational settings. Studies were included if they assessed the validity of the revised version of the SAEBRS-TRS. Data were extracted and coded for sample characteristics, procedural characteristics, evidence of validity, and quality appraisal. Results of the systematic search identified 29 studies meeting inclusion criteria, consisting of 65,317 students across K-12 grade levels. Overall, evidence of validity for SAEBRS-TRS scores was promising yet limited in several respects. Findings highlight limitations in the existing literature concerning the diversity of samples, a lack of studies examining measurement bias, the relative weakness of the Emotional Behavior subscale, and the need for further exploration of the factor structure for the revised version of the measure. Future research is critical to gain a complete understanding of this measure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 101449"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440525000226","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early identification of student social, emotional, and behavioral (SEB) concerns is vital to prevent and ameliorate future difficulties. Yet, assessment practices rely on sound validity arguments to accurately identify students who may benefit from support. As the strength of a validity argument relies on the extent of validity evidence, the synthesis of evidence may facilitate appropriate use and interpretation. Therefore, this systematic review synthesized peer-reviewed empirical studies and unpublished dissertations and theses of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener - Teacher Rating Scale (SAEBRS-TRS) conducted in educational settings. Studies were included if they assessed the validity of the revised version of the SAEBRS-TRS. Data were extracted and coded for sample characteristics, procedural characteristics, evidence of validity, and quality appraisal. Results of the systematic search identified 29 studies meeting inclusion criteria, consisting of 65,317 students across K-12 grade levels. Overall, evidence of validity for SAEBRS-TRS scores was promising yet limited in several respects. Findings highlight limitations in the existing literature concerning the diversity of samples, a lack of studies examining measurement bias, the relative weakness of the Emotional Behavior subscale, and the need for further exploration of the factor structure for the revised version of the measure. Future research is critical to gain a complete understanding of this measure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会、学业和情绪行为风险筛查--教师评分量表的有效性证据:系统回顾与定量综合
早期识别学生的社会、情感和行为(SEB)问题对于预防和改善未来的困难至关重要。然而,评估实践依赖于合理的有效性论证来准确地识别可能受益于支持的学生。由于有效性论证的强度取决于有效性证据的程度,证据的综合可能有助于适当的使用和解释。因此,本系统综述综合了在教育环境中进行的社会、学术和情感行为风险筛选-教师评定量表(SAEBRS-TRS)的同行评议的实证研究和未发表的论文和论文。如果研究评估了SAEBRS-TRS修订版的有效性,则纳入研究。提取数据并对样本特征、程序特征、有效性证据和质量评价进行编码。系统检索的结果确定了29项符合纳入标准的研究,包括65,317名K-12年级的学生。总体而言,SAEBRS-TRS评分的有效性证据是有希望的,但在几个方面受到限制。研究结果强调了现有文献在样本多样性、测量偏倚研究的缺乏、情绪行为子量表的相对薄弱以及需要进一步探索修订版本的因素结构等方面的局限性。未来的研究对于全面了解这一措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating a pragmatic universal social behavioral screener: Confirmatory factor analysis, invariance testing, and predictive validity of the early identification system – Teacher report Identifying implementation strategies to address barriers to universal mental health screening implementation: An expert panel study Leveraging the power of youth participatory action research to promote youth engagement and leadership in school psychology research Editorial Board Challenges in experimentally demonstrating racial bias in school discipline: Insights from a multi-study replication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1