Shale wastewater treatment policies recommended by integrated knowledge graph and probability-based algorithms

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1007/s10661-025-13964-0
Li He, Yugeng Luo, Mengxi He, Tong Sun, Yiming Yan, Wei Ye, Yupeng Lin
{"title":"Shale wastewater treatment policies recommended by integrated knowledge graph and probability-based algorithms","authors":"Li He,&nbsp;Yugeng Luo,&nbsp;Mengxi He,&nbsp;Tong Sun,&nbsp;Yiming Yan,&nbsp;Wei Ye,&nbsp;Yupeng Lin","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-13964-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shale wastewater (SWW) has received much attention recently due to its non-ignorable threat to the environment and human health. Selection of an appropriate SWW treatment technology or a set of technology combinations could be a challenge particularly when no substantial professional-knowledge (or prior experience) is available. This paper develops a modeling framework integrating knowledge graph (KG) and probability-based recommendation algorithms to produce SWW treatment policies without depending on conventional physically based mathematical models and their associated quantitative data. The model is applied to the shale regions in China, including Chongqing city, the provinces of Sichuan, Yunnan, Guizhou, Shaanxi, and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, and utilizes the Monte-Carlo (MC) technique to assess the stability of the output policies. Results show that chemical precipitation, ultrafiltration, membrane bioreactor, and electrodialysis in Knowledge Graph Convolutional Networks (KGCN), as well as ultrafiltration, electrocoagulation, reverse osmosis, and electrocatalytic oxidation in RippleNet, are all preferentially recommended in one scenario, with the MC-based probabilities all higher than 0.86, indicating the stability of recommendation results and robustness of the model. Future studies would focus on improving the current KG and algorithms and offering explanatory mechanisms behind policy recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-13964-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shale wastewater (SWW) has received much attention recently due to its non-ignorable threat to the environment and human health. Selection of an appropriate SWW treatment technology or a set of technology combinations could be a challenge particularly when no substantial professional-knowledge (or prior experience) is available. This paper develops a modeling framework integrating knowledge graph (KG) and probability-based recommendation algorithms to produce SWW treatment policies without depending on conventional physically based mathematical models and their associated quantitative data. The model is applied to the shale regions in China, including Chongqing city, the provinces of Sichuan, Yunnan, Guizhou, Shaanxi, and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, and utilizes the Monte-Carlo (MC) technique to assess the stability of the output policies. Results show that chemical precipitation, ultrafiltration, membrane bioreactor, and electrodialysis in Knowledge Graph Convolutional Networks (KGCN), as well as ultrafiltration, electrocoagulation, reverse osmosis, and electrocatalytic oxidation in RippleNet, are all preferentially recommended in one scenario, with the MC-based probabilities all higher than 0.86, indicating the stability of recommendation results and robustness of the model. Future studies would focus on improving the current KG and algorithms and offering explanatory mechanisms behind policy recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合知识图谱和基于概率的算法推荐的页岩废水处理政策
页岩废水(SWW)对环境和人类健康的威胁不容忽视,因此近来备受关注。选择合适的页岩废水处理技术或技术组合是一项挑战,尤其是在没有大量专业知识(或先前经验)的情况下。本文开发了一个模型框架,集成了知识图谱(KG)和基于概率的推荐算法,无需依赖传统的物理数学模型及其相关定量数据,即可制定污水处理政策。该模型适用于中国的页岩地区,包括重庆市、四川省、云南省、贵州省、陕西省和内蒙古自治区,并利用蒙特卡洛(Monte-Carlo,MC)技术评估了输出策略的稳定性。结果表明,知识图谱卷积网络(KGCN)中的化学沉淀、超滤、膜生物反应器和电渗析,以及涟漪网络(RippleNet)中的超滤、电凝、反渗透和电催化氧化,在一种情况下均优先推荐,基于 MC 的概率均大于 0.86,表明推荐结果的稳定性和模型的鲁棒性。今后的研究将侧重于改进当前的 KG 和算法,并提供政策建议背后的解释机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
期刊最新文献
Health risk assessment of cadmium exposure via multiple pathways in preschool children from the inland region of Northwest China. A quantum-inspired attention integrated scalar long short-term memory model for accurate and stable groundwater contaminant source inversion. A case for monitoring fungi of clinical relevance at beaches: enterococci measures do not correlate with all disease risks. Online high-resolution real-time monitoring techniques for anions in river water. Spatiotemporal drought analysis and future risk assessment using multi-index remote sensing approach and hybrid trend-based prediction modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1