Collaboration rules: A narrative comparison of engineering students and practicing engineers' collaboration experiences and beliefs using structuration theory

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Engineering Education Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1002/jee.70002
Robert P. Loweth, Shanna R. Daly, Leah Paborsky, Sara L. Hoffman, Steven J. Skerlos
{"title":"Collaboration rules: A narrative comparison of engineering students and practicing engineers' collaboration experiences and beliefs using structuration theory","authors":"Robert P. Loweth,&nbsp;Shanna R. Daly,&nbsp;Leah Paborsky,&nbsp;Sara L. Hoffman,&nbsp;Steven J. Skerlos","doi":"10.1002/jee.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Collaboration—including coordination, communication, and teamwork—is crucial to engineering practice. However, engineering students are often perceived as lacking key collaboration skills at the time of graduation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>We used structuration theory to explore how differences between students and practitioners' collaboration beliefs related to differences between academic and professional collaboration contexts. We sought to demonstrate that the perceived collaboration “skill gap” in engineering students can be explained by differences between academic and professional social systems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted interviews with 30 undergraduate engineering students and 28 practicing engineers, and from these interviews produced 98 discrete narratives of participants' collaboration experiences. We thematically analyzed these 98 collaboration narratives to identify student and practitioner collaboration beliefs. We further coded four narratives for organizational enablements and constraints to show how differences in student and practitioner collaboration beliefs related to differences in organizational collaboration “rules.”</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Students described boosting productivity through teamwork and limiting social bonding with teammates. These beliefs represented reasonable approaches to collaboration given observed organizational constraints including short project durations, single-discipline teams, and an inability to choose teammates. Practitioner beliefs about the importance of cross-functional collaboration and building collaborator rapport across projects reflected organizational enablements that facilitated collaborations with these qualities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Students' beliefs about appropriate academic collaboration practices did not translate to professional contexts. Instructors can prepare students for work by strategically easing collaboration constraints to allow for more diverse collaboration experiences. Work mentors should explain the collaboration expectations of their workplaces to facilitate new hire socialization.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"114 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jee.70002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Collaboration—including coordination, communication, and teamwork—is crucial to engineering practice. However, engineering students are often perceived as lacking key collaboration skills at the time of graduation.

Purpose

We used structuration theory to explore how differences between students and practitioners' collaboration beliefs related to differences between academic and professional collaboration contexts. We sought to demonstrate that the perceived collaboration “skill gap” in engineering students can be explained by differences between academic and professional social systems.

Methods

We conducted interviews with 30 undergraduate engineering students and 28 practicing engineers, and from these interviews produced 98 discrete narratives of participants' collaboration experiences. We thematically analyzed these 98 collaboration narratives to identify student and practitioner collaboration beliefs. We further coded four narratives for organizational enablements and constraints to show how differences in student and practitioner collaboration beliefs related to differences in organizational collaboration “rules.”

Findings

Students described boosting productivity through teamwork and limiting social bonding with teammates. These beliefs represented reasonable approaches to collaboration given observed organizational constraints including short project durations, single-discipline teams, and an inability to choose teammates. Practitioner beliefs about the importance of cross-functional collaboration and building collaborator rapport across projects reflected organizational enablements that facilitated collaborations with these qualities.

Conclusions

Students' beliefs about appropriate academic collaboration practices did not translate to professional contexts. Instructors can prepare students for work by strategically easing collaboration constraints to allow for more diverse collaboration experiences. Work mentors should explain the collaboration expectations of their workplaces to facilitate new hire socialization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协作规则:运用结构理论对工科学生和实习工程师的协作经验和信念进行叙述比较
协作——包括协调、沟通和团队合作——对工程实践至关重要。然而,工科学生在毕业时往往被认为缺乏关键的协作技能。目的运用结构理论探讨学生与从业人员协作信念的差异与学术与专业协作环境差异的关系。我们试图证明工程专业学生感知到的合作“技能差距”可以用学术和专业社会系统之间的差异来解释。方法我们对30名工科本科生和28名实习工程师进行了访谈,从这些访谈中产生了98个参与者合作经历的离散叙述。我们按主题分析了这98个合作故事,以确定学生和从业者的合作信念。我们进一步编码了组织实现和约束的四种叙述,以显示学生和从业者协作信念的差异如何与组织协作“规则”的差异相关。学生们描述了通过团队合作提高工作效率和限制与队友的社会联系。在观察到的组织约束条件下,这些信念代表了合理的协作方法,包括较短的项目持续时间、单一纪律的团队以及无法选择团队成员。实践者对跨功能协作和跨项目构建合作者关系的重要性的信念反映了组织的支持,这些支持促进了具有这些品质的协作。结论:学生对适当的学术合作实践的信念并没有转化为专业背景。教师可以通过战略性地放松协作约束,以允许更多样化的协作体验,为学生的工作做好准备。工作导师应该解释他们工作场所的协作期望,以促进新员工的社会化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Education
Journal of Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) serves to cultivate, disseminate, and archive scholarly research in engineering education.
期刊最新文献
Increasing Latinx migratory high school students' engineering interest and self-efficacy beliefs: A culturally responsive gamified engineering design activity Recommendations for the integration of generative artificial intelligence in support of engineering education research workflows Supporting fair use in context of instruments in engineering education research: A renewed conversation about validity Affordances and limitations of using large language models to generate qualitative data about mental health perceptions in engineering How do engineering students understand and conceptualize individual resilience?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1