A mediation model analysis of inclusive instructional practices for students with emotional disturbance

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1111/1471-3802.12731
Xiaoxia A. Newton, John W. McKenna, Frederick J. Brigham
{"title":"A mediation model analysis of inclusive instructional practices for students with emotional disturbance","authors":"Xiaoxia A. Newton,&nbsp;John W. McKenna,&nbsp;Frederick J. Brigham","doi":"10.1111/1471-3802.12731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The relationships among teachers' knowledge, use, and perceived effectiveness of inclusive instructional practices for students with emotional disturbance (ED) has implications for the provision of a free appropriate public education (FAPE). We unpacked these nuanced relationships through mediation analysis. Data for our study came from a broader survey investigation of inclusive instruction for students with ED in one of the northeastern states in the United States. The sample consisted of 176 teachers who were mostly female (85%) with an average of 12 years of teaching experiences. We found that (a) the relationship between teachers' reported knowledge and use of inclusive instructional practices was bidirectional, (b) special education teachers were far more likely to implement specialized instructional practices such as behavioural support and differentiation than general education teachers and (c) there were no reported differences in instructional practices (i.e. general practices) and classroom management between special education and general education teachers. Implications for pre-service teacher training, professional development and teacher support are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","volume":"25 2","pages":"368-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-3802.12731","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://nasenjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-3802.12731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationships among teachers' knowledge, use, and perceived effectiveness of inclusive instructional practices for students with emotional disturbance (ED) has implications for the provision of a free appropriate public education (FAPE). We unpacked these nuanced relationships through mediation analysis. Data for our study came from a broader survey investigation of inclusive instruction for students with ED in one of the northeastern states in the United States. The sample consisted of 176 teachers who were mostly female (85%) with an average of 12 years of teaching experiences. We found that (a) the relationship between teachers' reported knowledge and use of inclusive instructional practices was bidirectional, (b) special education teachers were far more likely to implement specialized instructional practices such as behavioural support and differentiation than general education teachers and (c) there were no reported differences in instructional practices (i.e. general practices) and classroom management between special education and general education teachers. Implications for pre-service teacher training, professional development and teacher support are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪障碍学生全纳教学实践的中介模型分析
教师对情绪障碍学生包容性教学实践的知识、使用和感知有效性之间的关系对提供免费适当的公共教育(FAPE)具有启示意义。我们通过中介分析揭示了这些微妙的关系。我们研究的数据来自美国东北部一个州对ED学生包容性教学的广泛调查。样本包括176名教师,其中大部分是女性(85%),平均有12年的教学经验。我们发现(a)教师报告的知识和使用包容性教学实践之间的关系是双向的,(b)特殊教育教师比普通教育教师更有可能实施专门的教学实践,如行为支持和区分,(c)特殊教育教师和普通教育教师在教学实践(即一般实践)和课堂管理方面没有报告的差异。对职前教师培训、专业发展和教师支持的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (JORSEN) is an established online forum for the dissemination of international research on special educational needs. JORSEN aims to: Publish original research, literature reviews and theoretical papers on meeting special educational needs Create an international forum for researchers to reflect on, and share ideas regarding, issues of particular importance to them such as methodology, research design and ethical issues Reach a wide multi-disciplinary national and international audience through online publication Authors are invited to submit reports of original research, reviews of research and scholarly papers on methodology, research design and ethical issues. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs will provide essential reading for those working in the special educational needs field wherever that work takes place around the world. It will be of particular interest to those working in: Research Teaching and learning support Policymaking Administration and supervision Educational psychology Advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Bullying in special schools: Types, frequency and school staff's self-efficacy Diverse students' perceptions of diversity and inclusion in higher education: A critical review of questionnaires ‘It's really difficult because sometimes you want to be special and different and sometimes you just want to be like everybody else’: Including families of children with chromosomal learning disabilities in a longitudinal qualitative cohort study ‘It's really difficult because sometimes you want to be special and different and sometimes you just want to be like everybody else’: Including families of children with chromosomal learning disabilities in a longitudinal qualitative cohort study ‘And it's also much more quiet there!’—A qualitative study on the relationship between differentiated instruction and classroom disruptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1