Heterogeneous treatment effects of stress ulcer prophylaxis among ICU patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1186/s12916-025-04038-6
Yongpeng Xie, Yao Yan, Qixiang Hong, Hui Zheng, Lijuan Cao, Xiaoming Li, Songqiao Liu, Hui Chen
{"title":"Heterogeneous treatment effects of stress ulcer prophylaxis among ICU patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding.","authors":"Yongpeng Xie, Yao Yan, Qixiang Hong, Hui Zheng, Lijuan Cao, Xiaoming Li, Songqiao Liu, Hui Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04038-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While randomized clinical trials of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) have generally shown no overall benefit, subgroup analyses suggest the benefit or harm of SUP in specific patients, indicating heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE). Understanding HTE is crucial for tailoring SUP to individual treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study included patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with at least one risk factor for clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). The primary exposure was the use of SUP within 48 h after ICU entry; the primary outcome was 28-day mortality. We employed conventional subgroup analysis, risk-based analysis, and effect-based analysis to explore the HTE of SUP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25,475 patients were included, of whom 6199 (24.3%) received SUP, with famotidine being the most commonly prescribed (53.7%). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between treatment groups after weighting. SUP was not associated with the 28-day mortality in the overall population (median value for the posterior distribution of the odds ratio (OR), 1.03; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.96-1.11). In conventional subgroups, the impact of SUP on 28-day mortality varied substantially between patients with an age of higher than or equal to 77 years in comparison with other age subgroups (posterior probability of difference in OR, 99.3%), between patients with and without chronic liver disease (posterior probability of difference in OR, 99.9%), between patients with and without coagulopathy (posterior probability of difference in OR, 92.1%), and between patients with and without malignant cancer (posterior probability of difference in OR, 100%). In risk-based analysis, patients at high risk of death exhibited the highest propensity for benefit from SUP (posterior probability of an OR > 1, 1.9%). In effect-based analysis, patients with malignant cancer and a higher Charlson comorbidity index identified at high probability of benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among ICU patients with at least one risk factor for clinically important GIB, those who are younger, have chronic liver disease, coagulopathy, or malignant cancer are more likely to benefit from SUP.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"206"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04038-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While randomized clinical trials of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) have generally shown no overall benefit, subgroup analyses suggest the benefit or harm of SUP in specific patients, indicating heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE). Understanding HTE is crucial for tailoring SUP to individual treatment.

Methods: This cohort study included patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with at least one risk factor for clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). The primary exposure was the use of SUP within 48 h after ICU entry; the primary outcome was 28-day mortality. We employed conventional subgroup analysis, risk-based analysis, and effect-based analysis to explore the HTE of SUP.

Results: A total of 25,475 patients were included, of whom 6199 (24.3%) received SUP, with famotidine being the most commonly prescribed (53.7%). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between treatment groups after weighting. SUP was not associated with the 28-day mortality in the overall population (median value for the posterior distribution of the odds ratio (OR), 1.03; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.96-1.11). In conventional subgroups, the impact of SUP on 28-day mortality varied substantially between patients with an age of higher than or equal to 77 years in comparison with other age subgroups (posterior probability of difference in OR, 99.3%), between patients with and without chronic liver disease (posterior probability of difference in OR, 99.9%), between patients with and without coagulopathy (posterior probability of difference in OR, 92.1%), and between patients with and without malignant cancer (posterior probability of difference in OR, 100%). In risk-based analysis, patients at high risk of death exhibited the highest propensity for benefit from SUP (posterior probability of an OR > 1, 1.9%). In effect-based analysis, patients with malignant cancer and a higher Charlson comorbidity index identified at high probability of benefit.

Conclusions: Among ICU patients with at least one risk factor for clinically important GIB, those who are younger, have chronic liver disease, coagulopathy, or malignant cancer are more likely to benefit from SUP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有消化道出血风险的ICU患者应激性溃疡预防的异质性治疗效果。
背景:虽然应激性溃疡预防(SUP)的随机临床试验通常没有显示出总体益处,但亚组分析表明,在特定患者中,SUP的益处或危害,表明治疗效果(HTE)的异质性。了解HTE对于根据个人治疗量身定制SUP至关重要。方法:本队列研究纳入了至少有一种临床重要胃肠道出血危险因素的重症监护病房(ICU)患者。主要暴露是在进入ICU后48小时内使用SUP;主要终点为28天死亡率。结果:共纳入25,475例患者,其中6199例(24.3%)接受了SUP治疗,其中法莫替丁是最常用的处方(53.7%)。加权后各组基线特征平衡良好。SUP与总体人群的28天死亡率无关(优势比后验分布中值(OR)为1.03;95%可信区间(CrI, 0.96-1.11)。在常规亚组中,与其他年龄亚组相比,年龄大于或等于77岁的患者(or差的后验概率为99.3%)、患有和不患有慢性肝病的患者(or差的后验概率为99.9%)、患有和不患有凝血功能障碍的患者(or差的后验概率为92.1%)之间SUP对28天死亡率的影响存在很大差异。恶性肿瘤患者和非恶性肿瘤患者之间(OR差异的后验概率为100%)。在基于风险的分析中,死亡风险高的患者表现出从SUP获益的最高倾向(OR bbb1的后验概率为1.1,1.9%)。在基于效果的分析中,恶性肿瘤患者和较高的Charlson合并症指数确定为高获益概率。结论:在至少有一个临床重要GIB危险因素的ICU患者中,那些年轻、患有慢性肝病、凝血功能障碍或恶性癌症的患者更有可能从SUP中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
The clinical landscape of POLE-mutant colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis of real-world outcome. Elevated maternal pre-transfer serum lipid peroxidation is associated with implantation failure and early pregnancy loss. Impact of diagnosis to ablation time on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: post hoc analysis of the CABANA trial. SGLT-2 Inhibitor use and liver-related and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and compensated cirrhosis. Impact of Helicobacter pylori infection on gut and intratumoral microbiome and its association with immunotherapy response in gastrointestinal cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1