A Random Study of Comparing the Efficacy of Antiosteoporosis Therapy at Different Time Points Combined With Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease Patients Complicated With Osteoporosis.
Haien Zhao, Xin Dong, Xiaoming Bao, Xiaoping Zhang, Kun Ren, Huanhuan Qiao, Weidong Guo, Kang Yan, Bo Liao
{"title":"A Random Study of Comparing the Efficacy of Antiosteoporosis Therapy at Different Time Points Combined With Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease Patients Complicated With Osteoporosis.","authors":"Haien Zhao, Xin Dong, Xiaoming Bao, Xiaoping Zhang, Kun Ren, Huanhuan Qiao, Weidong Guo, Kang Yan, Bo Liao","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted this study to compare the clinical efficacy of antiosteoporosis at different starting time points combined with oblique lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease complicated with patients with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Seki and colleagues found that perioperative administration of teriparatide was more effective than that of bisphosphonates in preventing complications in osteoporotic females undergoing surgery. Inoue and colleagues found that the injection of teriparatide beginning at least 1 month before surgery was effective in increasing the insertional torque of pedicle screws during surgery in patients with osteoporosis. Ohtori and colleagues concluded that teriparatide improved the quality of the lumbar spine and reduced the incidence of screw loosening.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-nine patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: (1) the advanced group (AG; 30 cases) was treated advanced with antiosteoporosis for 3-6 months, followed by surgical treatment, and (2) the simultaneous group (SG; 29 cases) received antiosteoporosis and surgical treatment simultaneously. The primary outcome was cage subsidence rate. Secondary outcomes included screw loosening rate, intervertebral height, Visual Analog Scale, segmental lordosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle, and bone mineral density.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the cage subsidence rate ( P = 0.76) and screw loosening rate ( P = 0.98) between the AG and the SG. The immediate postoperative disk height was significantly different from that before surgery, both in the AG and the SG ( P < 0.00001). When compared within the same group at different times, both AG ( P < 0.00001) and SG ( P < 0.00001) had significantly lower Visual Analog Scale scores after surgery than before. Both of the segmental and lumbar lordosis angles after surgery were significantly higher than that of before. At the final follow-up, bone mineral density was significantly higher than that of presurgery in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both starting time points of teriparatide treatment were effective in preventing cage subsidence and screw loosening after oblique lateral interbody fusion, without affecting clinical improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"E448-E457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12655867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Randomized controlled trials.
Objectives: We conducted this study to compare the clinical efficacy of antiosteoporosis at different starting time points combined with oblique lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease complicated with patients with osteoporosis.
Background: Seki and colleagues found that perioperative administration of teriparatide was more effective than that of bisphosphonates in preventing complications in osteoporotic females undergoing surgery. Inoue and colleagues found that the injection of teriparatide beginning at least 1 month before surgery was effective in increasing the insertional torque of pedicle screws during surgery in patients with osteoporosis. Ohtori and colleagues concluded that teriparatide improved the quality of the lumbar spine and reduced the incidence of screw loosening.
Materials and methods: Fifty-nine patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: (1) the advanced group (AG; 30 cases) was treated advanced with antiosteoporosis for 3-6 months, followed by surgical treatment, and (2) the simultaneous group (SG; 29 cases) received antiosteoporosis and surgical treatment simultaneously. The primary outcome was cage subsidence rate. Secondary outcomes included screw loosening rate, intervertebral height, Visual Analog Scale, segmental lordosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle, and bone mineral density.
Results: There was no significant difference in the cage subsidence rate ( P = 0.76) and screw loosening rate ( P = 0.98) between the AG and the SG. The immediate postoperative disk height was significantly different from that before surgery, both in the AG and the SG ( P < 0.00001). When compared within the same group at different times, both AG ( P < 0.00001) and SG ( P < 0.00001) had significantly lower Visual Analog Scale scores after surgery than before. Both of the segmental and lumbar lordosis angles after surgery were significantly higher than that of before. At the final follow-up, bone mineral density was significantly higher than that of presurgery in both groups.
Conclusions: Both starting time points of teriparatide treatment were effective in preventing cage subsidence and screw loosening after oblique lateral interbody fusion, without affecting clinical improvement.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.