A Random Study of Comparing the Efficacy of Antiosteoporosis Therapy at Different Time Points Combined With Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease Patients Complicated With Osteoporosis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001786
Haien Zhao, Xin Dong, Xiaoming Bao, Xiaoping Zhang, Kun Ren, Huanhuan Qiao, Weidong Guo, Kang Yan, Bo Liao
{"title":"A Random Study of Comparing the Efficacy of Antiosteoporosis Therapy at Different Time Points Combined With Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease Patients Complicated With Osteoporosis.","authors":"Haien Zhao, Xin Dong, Xiaoming Bao, Xiaoping Zhang, Kun Ren, Huanhuan Qiao, Weidong Guo, Kang Yan, Bo Liao","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted this study to compare the clinical efficacy of antiosteoporosis at different starting time points combined with oblique lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease complicated with patients with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Seki and colleagues found that perioperative administration of teriparatide was more effective than that of bisphosphonates in preventing complications in osteoporotic females undergoing surgery. Inoue and colleagues found that the injection of teriparatide beginning at least 1 month before surgery was effective in increasing the insertional torque of pedicle screws during surgery in patients with osteoporosis. Ohtori and colleagues concluded that teriparatide improved the quality of the lumbar spine and reduced the incidence of screw loosening.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-nine patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: (1) the advanced group (AG; 30 cases) was treated advanced with antiosteoporosis for 3-6 months, followed by surgical treatment, and (2) the simultaneous group (SG; 29 cases) received antiosteoporosis and surgical treatment simultaneously. The primary outcome was cage subsidence rate. Secondary outcomes included screw loosening rate, intervertebral height, Visual Analog Scale, segmental lordosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle, and bone mineral density.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the cage subsidence rate ( P = 0.76) and screw loosening rate ( P = 0.98) between the AG and the SG. The immediate postoperative disk height was significantly different from that before surgery, both in the AG and the SG ( P < 0.00001). When compared within the same group at different times, both AG ( P < 0.00001) and SG ( P < 0.00001) had significantly lower Visual Analog Scale scores after surgery than before. Both of the segmental and lumbar lordosis angles after surgery were significantly higher than that of before. At the final follow-up, bone mineral density was significantly higher than that of presurgery in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both starting time points of teriparatide treatment were effective in preventing cage subsidence and screw loosening after oblique lateral interbody fusion, without affecting clinical improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"E448-E457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12655867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Randomized controlled trials.

Objectives: We conducted this study to compare the clinical efficacy of antiosteoporosis at different starting time points combined with oblique lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease complicated with patients with osteoporosis.

Background: Seki and colleagues found that perioperative administration of teriparatide was more effective than that of bisphosphonates in preventing complications in osteoporotic females undergoing surgery. Inoue and colleagues found that the injection of teriparatide beginning at least 1 month before surgery was effective in increasing the insertional torque of pedicle screws during surgery in patients with osteoporosis. Ohtori and colleagues concluded that teriparatide improved the quality of the lumbar spine and reduced the incidence of screw loosening.

Materials and methods: Fifty-nine patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: (1) the advanced group (AG; 30 cases) was treated advanced with antiosteoporosis for 3-6 months, followed by surgical treatment, and (2) the simultaneous group (SG; 29 cases) received antiosteoporosis and surgical treatment simultaneously. The primary outcome was cage subsidence rate. Secondary outcomes included screw loosening rate, intervertebral height, Visual Analog Scale, segmental lordosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle, and bone mineral density.

Results: There was no significant difference in the cage subsidence rate ( P = 0.76) and screw loosening rate ( P = 0.98) between the AG and the SG. The immediate postoperative disk height was significantly different from that before surgery, both in the AG and the SG ( P < 0.00001). When compared within the same group at different times, both AG ( P < 0.00001) and SG ( P < 0.00001) had significantly lower Visual Analog Scale scores after surgery than before. Both of the segmental and lumbar lordosis angles after surgery were significantly higher than that of before. At the final follow-up, bone mineral density was significantly higher than that of presurgery in both groups.

Conclusions: Both starting time points of teriparatide treatment were effective in preventing cage subsidence and screw loosening after oblique lateral interbody fusion, without affecting clinical improvement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同时间点抗骨质疏松联合斜侧椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病合并骨质疏松的疗效比较随机研究
研究设计:随机对照试验。目的:比较不同起始时间点抗骨质疏松联合斜外侧椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病合并骨质疏松患者的临床疗效。背景:Seki及其同事发现,围手术期给予特立帕肽比双膦酸盐更有效地预防骨质疏松症女性手术并发症。Inoue及其同事发现,在骨质疏松症患者手术期间,在手术前至少1个月开始注射特立帕肽可有效增加椎弓根螺钉的插入力矩。Ohtori和他的同事得出结论,特立帕肽改善了腰椎的质量,减少了螺钉松动的发生率。材料与方法:59例患者随机分为2组:(1)晚期组(AG组;(2)同期组(SG;29例)同时接受抗骨质疏松和手术治疗。主要结果是笼沉降率。次要结果包括螺钉松动率、椎间高度、视觉模拟量表、节段性前凸角、腰椎前凸角和骨密度。结果:两组间保持架下沉率(P = 0.76)和螺钉松动率(P = 0.98)差异无统计学意义。术后即刻椎间盘高度与术前比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.00001)。同一组内不同时间比较,术后AG组(P < 0.00001)和SG组(P < 0.00001)的视觉模拟量表评分均明显低于术前。术后节段和腰椎前凸角均明显高于术前。最后随访时,两组骨密度均明显高于术前。结论:特立帕肽治疗的两个起始时间点均能有效预防斜外侧椎间融合术后椎体笼下沉和螺钉松动,不影响临床改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
期刊最新文献
Factors Affecting the Fusion Process and Comparison of PLIF and TLIF Techniques in Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Routine or Required? Reassessing Cervical CT Use in Geriatric Head Trauma-A Retrospective Analysis From a German Level I Trauma Center. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Perceived Stress in Elderly Patients With Osteoporotic Fractures of Spine. Odontoid Parameters in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients. When Does the Construct Need to Extend further Into the Thoracic Spine in Patients Undergoing Correction for Cervical Deformity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1