Minimum five years outcomes of modular dual mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS International Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1007/s00264-025-06507-2
Marco Minelli, Elizaveta Kon, Alessio D'Addona, Marco Rosolani, Berardo Di Matteo, Federico Della Rocca
{"title":"Minimum five years outcomes of modular dual mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.","authors":"Marco Minelli, Elizaveta Kon, Alessio D'Addona, Marco Rosolani, Berardo Di Matteo, Federico Della Rocca","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06507-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modular dual mobility (MDM) cups are constituted by a cobalt-chromium (CoCr) liner inserted into a standard acetabular shell, allowing for intra-operative decision and supplementary screw fixation of the acetabular component. MDM could face mechanical issues and biological issues, with the associated risk of elevated blood metal ions levels and adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature on minimum five years outcomes of modular dual mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases, in adherence with PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias in each study was assessed through the JBI checklist for case series.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 381 primary THAs with MDM acetabular cup were performed. At minimum five years follow-up, mean revision rate was 2.3% and implant survivorship was 98.2%. No MDM acetabular construct was revised specifically due to liner mechanical failure, neck-rim impingement, or ALTRs. No intraprosthetic dislocation or iliopsoas tendinitis was observed. No cases of THA dislocation were reported. Mean serum metal ion levels were observed to be within laboratory reference ranges. Greater-than-normal values of serum Co were observed in 9.4% of cases, while greater-than-normal values of serum Cr were observed in 1.6% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The main finding of this systematic review is that modular dual mobility acetabular construct appears to be a safe and effective option for primary THA at minimum five years follow-up. Longer follow-up time is needed in order to investigate modular dual mobility long-term survivorship, revision and complication rates, clinical and radiological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"1699-1707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06507-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Modular dual mobility (MDM) cups are constituted by a cobalt-chromium (CoCr) liner inserted into a standard acetabular shell, allowing for intra-operative decision and supplementary screw fixation of the acetabular component. MDM could face mechanical issues and biological issues, with the associated risk of elevated blood metal ions levels and adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs).

Materials and methods: A systematic review of the literature on minimum five years outcomes of modular dual mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases, in adherence with PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias in each study was assessed through the JBI checklist for case series.

Results: A total of 381 primary THAs with MDM acetabular cup were performed. At minimum five years follow-up, mean revision rate was 2.3% and implant survivorship was 98.2%. No MDM acetabular construct was revised specifically due to liner mechanical failure, neck-rim impingement, or ALTRs. No intraprosthetic dislocation or iliopsoas tendinitis was observed. No cases of THA dislocation were reported. Mean serum metal ion levels were observed to be within laboratory reference ranges. Greater-than-normal values of serum Co were observed in 9.4% of cases, while greater-than-normal values of serum Cr were observed in 1.6% of patients.

Conclusions: The main finding of this systematic review is that modular dual mobility acetabular construct appears to be a safe and effective option for primary THA at minimum five years follow-up. Longer follow-up time is needed in order to investigate modular dual mobility long-term survivorship, revision and complication rates, clinical and radiological outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首次全髋关节置换术中模块化双活动最少5年的结果:一项系统回顾。
背景:模块化双活动杯(MDM)由钴铬(CoCr)衬垫插入标准髋臼壳组成,允许术中决策和辅助螺钉固定髋臼部件。MDM可能面临机械问题和生物问题,并伴有血液金属离子水平升高和不良局部组织反应(ALTRs)的相关风险。材料和方法:根据PRISMA指南,在PubMed、Cochrane和谷歌Scholar数据库中对原发性全髋关节置换术(THA)中模块化双活动最少5年结果的文献进行了系统回顾。每个研究的偏倚风险通过JBI病例系列检查表进行评估。结果:采用MDM髋臼杯共行原发性tha 381例。至少5年随访,平均修复率为2.3%,种植体成活率为98.2%。没有MDM髋臼假体因内衬机械故障、颈缘撞击或ALTRs而被特别修改。无假体内脱位或髂腰肌肌腱炎。无THA脱位病例报道。平均血清金属离子水平在实验室参考范围内。9.4%的患者血清Co高于正常值,1.6%的患者血清Cr高于正常值。结论:本系统综述的主要发现是模块化双活动髋臼结构在至少5年的随访中似乎是原发性THA的安全有效的选择。需要更长的随访时间来调查模块化双活动的长期生存、翻修和并发症发生率、临床和放射学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Orthopaedics
International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
360
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
期刊最新文献
Quality of life before and during the COVID-19 pandemic for people undergoing hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty-nationwide results from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Autologous platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid, corticosteroids or saline for knee osteoarthritis: can blood draw volume serve as a proxy for platelet dose? A systematic review and meta-analysis. A new approach to the lower cervical-thoracic spine with dislocation of the sterno-clavicular joint: FAMA (Fast Anterior Medium Approach). Demographics and outcomes of unicondylar knee arthroplasty in Türkiye: a nationwide retrospective database study of eight thousand, five hundred and ninety cases. Capsular reconstruction versus excision in anterolateral total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1