{"title":"HIV Viral Rebound on Dolutegravir, Lopinavir, and Efavirenz: National Program Data Analysis From Ukraine.","authors":"Olga Morozova, Kyle Conroy, Serhii Riabokon, Myroslava Germanovich, Yaroslav Zelinskyi, Nancy Puttkammer, Kostyantyn Dumchev","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dolutegravir (DTG), an integrase strand transfer inhibitor, is recommended as the preferred first-line HIV medication globally because of higher efficacy, better tolerability, and higher genetic barrier to resistance compared with other antiretroviral therapy (ART) drug classes. However, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of DTG in sustaining durable viral suppression (VS) in real-world settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from electronic health records of a retrospective cohort of ART-naïve (N = 3793) and ART-experienced (N = 14,367) people receiving HIV treatment in Ukraine between October 2017 and September 2018, comparing incidence of viral rebound (viral load ≥ 200 HIV RNA copies/mL) after the first documented VS among participants on DTG-, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-, and efavirenz-based regimens. Participants were followed until June 2019. Interval censoring survival analysis with cluster-robust standard errors was used to estimate the effects of ART regimen on viral rebound adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>N = 714 (3.9%) participants experienced viral rebound during follow-up. In the ART-naïve cohort, the incidence of rebound was 6.9 events [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.9 to 8.0] per 100 person-years. Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based regimens were associated with higher hazard of rebound compared with DTG-based regimens: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3 to 2.4). Efavirenz-based regimens had similar incidence of rebound compared with DTG: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.1 (95% CI: 0.9 to 1.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Favorable performance of DTG compared with other first-line ART options in sustaining VS supports continued roll-out of DTG-based regimens. High overall incidence of viral rebound, including on DTG-based regimens, calls for targeted evidence-based adherence support interventions and improved viral load and drug resistance monitoring, especially among high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14588,"journal":{"name":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","volume":" ","pages":"395-404"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12629402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003676","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Dolutegravir (DTG), an integrase strand transfer inhibitor, is recommended as the preferred first-line HIV medication globally because of higher efficacy, better tolerability, and higher genetic barrier to resistance compared with other antiretroviral therapy (ART) drug classes. However, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of DTG in sustaining durable viral suppression (VS) in real-world settings.
Methods: We analyzed data from electronic health records of a retrospective cohort of ART-naïve (N = 3793) and ART-experienced (N = 14,367) people receiving HIV treatment in Ukraine between October 2017 and September 2018, comparing incidence of viral rebound (viral load ≥ 200 HIV RNA copies/mL) after the first documented VS among participants on DTG-, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-, and efavirenz-based regimens. Participants were followed until June 2019. Interval censoring survival analysis with cluster-robust standard errors was used to estimate the effects of ART regimen on viral rebound adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.
Results: N = 714 (3.9%) participants experienced viral rebound during follow-up. In the ART-naïve cohort, the incidence of rebound was 6.9 events [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.9 to 8.0] per 100 person-years. Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based regimens were associated with higher hazard of rebound compared with DTG-based regimens: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3 to 2.4). Efavirenz-based regimens had similar incidence of rebound compared with DTG: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.1 (95% CI: 0.9 to 1.3).
Conclusions: Favorable performance of DTG compared with other first-line ART options in sustaining VS supports continued roll-out of DTG-based regimens. High overall incidence of viral rebound, including on DTG-based regimens, calls for targeted evidence-based adherence support interventions and improved viral load and drug resistance monitoring, especially among high-risk populations.
期刊介绍:
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes seeks to end the HIV epidemic by presenting important new science across all disciplines that advance our understanding of the biology, treatment and prevention of HIV infection worldwide.
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes is the trusted, interdisciplinary resource for HIV- and AIDS-related information with a strong focus on basic and translational science, clinical science, and epidemiology and prevention. Co-edited by the foremost leaders in clinical virology, molecular biology, and epidemiology, JAIDS publishes vital information on the advances in diagnosis and treatment of HIV infections, as well as the latest research in the development of therapeutics and vaccine approaches. This ground-breaking journal brings together rigorously peer-reviewed articles, reviews of current research, results of clinical trials, and epidemiologic reports from around the world.