Latent Profile Analysis of Pain Catastrophizing in Post-Operative Lung Cancer Patients.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S507027
Xinyan Wu, Tao Xu, Ping Cai, Siwen Shen, Mengchen Ji, Qing Liu, Xiaobo Wang, Mingqi Zhang, Shiming Wang, Danfeng Gu
{"title":"Latent Profile Analysis of Pain Catastrophizing in Post-Operative Lung Cancer Patients.","authors":"Xinyan Wu, Tao Xu, Ping Cai, Siwen Shen, Mengchen Ji, Qing Liu, Xiaobo Wang, Mingqi Zhang, Shiming Wang, Danfeng Gu","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S507027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with lung cancer often experience high levels of pain and recurrent pain episodes after thoracoscopic surgery, compromising their adherence to rehabilitation exercises and quality of life. Pain catastrophizing is defined as an exaggerated and negative mindset towards actual or anticipated pain and is one of the significant factors influencing pain. To date, prior investigations on pain catastrophizing have predominantly employed variable-centered approaches, focusing on broader population levels while neglecting individual specificity. Latent profile analysis represents an individual-centered data analysis method that can accurately identify distinct phenotypic subgroups and deeply analyze the characteristics of each subgroup. This enables clinicians to identify high-risk patients early and provide precision interventions to reduce pain catastrophizing and ultimately alleviate postoperative pain burden. Stratification-guided interventions play a crucial role in treating patients with pain catastrophizing, aligning with the principles of precision medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>409 patients were included in this cross-sectional study. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was employed to discern distinct classes of pain catastrophizing among these patients. Chi-square tests, ANOVA, and multinomial logistic regression were conducted to analyze the factors influencing the different pain catastrophizing profiles among patients following thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct latent classes of pain catastrophizing were identified, Class1, labeled \"Mild Pain Catastrophizing-Rumination Type\"(26.2% of participants), Class2, referred to as \"Moderate Pain Catastrophizing-Ruminative Exaggerative Type\"(33.2%), Class3, designated as \"Severe Pain Catastrophizing-Ruminative Helpless Exaggerative Type\"(40.6%). Unordered multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that factors influencing mild pain catastrophizing included fatigue, perception of social support, marital status, primary caregiver, tumor location, and clinical stage. In contrast, factors influencing moderate pain catastrophizing included fatigue, perception of social support, marital status, education level, primary caregiver, and clinical stage (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three distinct patterns of pain catastrophizing were identified in patients following lung cancer surgery, each exhibiting unique classification characteristics. Healthcare professionals should promptly identify individuals at high risk for pain catastrophizing and develop targeted interventions that address physiological, psychological, and social factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"1735-1745"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S507027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with lung cancer often experience high levels of pain and recurrent pain episodes after thoracoscopic surgery, compromising their adherence to rehabilitation exercises and quality of life. Pain catastrophizing is defined as an exaggerated and negative mindset towards actual or anticipated pain and is one of the significant factors influencing pain. To date, prior investigations on pain catastrophizing have predominantly employed variable-centered approaches, focusing on broader population levels while neglecting individual specificity. Latent profile analysis represents an individual-centered data analysis method that can accurately identify distinct phenotypic subgroups and deeply analyze the characteristics of each subgroup. This enables clinicians to identify high-risk patients early and provide precision interventions to reduce pain catastrophizing and ultimately alleviate postoperative pain burden. Stratification-guided interventions play a crucial role in treating patients with pain catastrophizing, aligning with the principles of precision medicine.

Methods: 409 patients were included in this cross-sectional study. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was employed to discern distinct classes of pain catastrophizing among these patients. Chi-square tests, ANOVA, and multinomial logistic regression were conducted to analyze the factors influencing the different pain catastrophizing profiles among patients following thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.

Results: Three distinct latent classes of pain catastrophizing were identified, Class1, labeled "Mild Pain Catastrophizing-Rumination Type"(26.2% of participants), Class2, referred to as "Moderate Pain Catastrophizing-Ruminative Exaggerative Type"(33.2%), Class3, designated as "Severe Pain Catastrophizing-Ruminative Helpless Exaggerative Type"(40.6%). Unordered multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that factors influencing mild pain catastrophizing included fatigue, perception of social support, marital status, primary caregiver, tumor location, and clinical stage. In contrast, factors influencing moderate pain catastrophizing included fatigue, perception of social support, marital status, education level, primary caregiver, and clinical stage (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Three distinct patterns of pain catastrophizing were identified in patients following lung cancer surgery, each exhibiting unique classification characteristics. Healthcare professionals should promptly identify individuals at high risk for pain catastrophizing and develop targeted interventions that address physiological, psychological, and social factors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺癌术后疼痛突变的潜在特征分析。
背景:肺癌患者在胸腔镜手术后经常经历高度疼痛和复发性疼痛发作,影响他们对康复训练的坚持和生活质量。疼痛灾难化被定义为对实际或预期疼痛的一种夸大的、消极的心态,是影响疼痛的重要因素之一。迄今为止,先前对疼痛灾难化的研究主要采用以变量为中心的方法,侧重于更广泛的人群水平,而忽略了个体特异性。潜在剖面分析是一种以个体为中心的数据分析方法,可以准确识别不同的表型亚组,并深入分析每个亚组的特征。这使临床医生能够早期识别高危患者,并提供精确的干预措施,以减少疼痛的灾难,最终减轻术后疼痛负担。分层指导的干预措施在治疗疼痛灾难患者中起着至关重要的作用,符合精准医学的原则。方法:对409例患者进行横断面研究。使用潜在特征分析(LPA)来识别这些患者中不同类型的疼痛灾难。采用卡方检验、方差分析和多项logistic回归分析影响胸腔镜肺癌手术患者不同疼痛灾难化特征的因素。结果:发现了3种明显的疼痛灾变潜在类型,Class1为“轻度疼痛灾变-反刍型”(26.2%),Class2为“中度疼痛灾变-反刍夸张型”(33.2%),Class3为“重度疼痛灾变-反刍无助夸张型”(40.6%)。无序多项logistic回归分析显示,影响轻度疼痛灾难化的因素包括疲劳程度、社会支持感知、婚姻状况、主要照顾者、肿瘤位置和临床分期。影响中度疼痛灾难化的因素有疲劳程度、社会支持感知、婚姻状况、文化程度、主要照顾者、临床分期(P < 0.05)。结论:肺癌手术后患者疼痛灾变有三种不同的模式,每种模式都有独特的分类特征。医疗保健专业人员应及时识别疼痛灾难化的高风险个体,并针对生理、心理和社会因素制定有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Multi-Institutional Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Manual Maintenance Therapy for Chronic Bothersome Neck Pain. Psychometric Properties of a Smartphone Application for Measuring Shoulder Active Range of Motion in Individuals with and without Shoulder Pain and Mobility Deficits. Effectiveness of Jaw Exercises Applied in Addition to Cervical Stabilization Exercises in Individuals with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Letter]. Exploring Acceptance of Pain Management Strategies in Oncology: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Survey. The Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Block in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1