Impact of PDA Closure Methodology on Peri-procedural Opioid Utilization in Preterm Neonates, a Cross-Sectional Review in a Tertiary Pediatric Healthcare System.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pediatric Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1007/s00246-025-03855-z
Ashish Saini, Shannon Hamrick, Marissa Adamson, Shazia Bhombal, Sarah Hash, Dennis W Kim, Ashley S LeFevre, Justin Long, Marcos Mills, R Allen Ligon
{"title":"Impact of PDA Closure Methodology on Peri-procedural Opioid Utilization in Preterm Neonates, a Cross-Sectional Review in a Tertiary Pediatric Healthcare System.","authors":"Ashish Saini, Shannon Hamrick, Marissa Adamson, Shazia Bhombal, Sarah Hash, Dennis W Kim, Ashley S LeFevre, Justin Long, Marcos Mills, R Allen Ligon","doi":"10.1007/s00246-025-03855-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To study the association between technique for definitive closure of PDA and peri-procedural opioid utilization in preterm neonates. A retrospective cohort study comprising all premature neonates and infants with a PDA who underwent surgical ligation (SL) between February 2020 and December 2022 or transcatheter PDA closure (TCPC) between August 2020 and February 2023. Intra-procedural and post-procedural opioid use was systematically quantified and compared between the two groups before and after 1:1 propensity score matching. We hypothesized that preterm neonates and infants undergoing TCPC will have an overall reduction in peri-procedural opioid exposure compared to those undergoing SL. The study included 52 preterm infants in the SL group and 74 in the TCPC group. After propensity score matching, infants undergoing TCPC received significantly lower intra-procedural (4.33 vs 5.99 µg/kg, P = 0.037) and post-procedural (0.09 vs 0.32 mg/kg, P < 0.001) opioids. A significantly lower proportion of infants undergoing TCPC were exposed to post-procedural opioids (60.8% vs 92.3%, P = < 0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression model, surgical ligation was associated with sevenfold higher odds of post-procedural opioid exposure compared to TCPC (OR 7.2, 95% CI of 2.1-24.2, P = 0.001). Transcatheter PDA device closure is associated with significantly lower neonatal opioid exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-03855-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To study the association between technique for definitive closure of PDA and peri-procedural opioid utilization in preterm neonates. A retrospective cohort study comprising all premature neonates and infants with a PDA who underwent surgical ligation (SL) between February 2020 and December 2022 or transcatheter PDA closure (TCPC) between August 2020 and February 2023. Intra-procedural and post-procedural opioid use was systematically quantified and compared between the two groups before and after 1:1 propensity score matching. We hypothesized that preterm neonates and infants undergoing TCPC will have an overall reduction in peri-procedural opioid exposure compared to those undergoing SL. The study included 52 preterm infants in the SL group and 74 in the TCPC group. After propensity score matching, infants undergoing TCPC received significantly lower intra-procedural (4.33 vs 5.99 µg/kg, P = 0.037) and post-procedural (0.09 vs 0.32 mg/kg, P < 0.001) opioids. A significantly lower proportion of infants undergoing TCPC were exposed to post-procedural opioids (60.8% vs 92.3%, P = < 0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression model, surgical ligation was associated with sevenfold higher odds of post-procedural opioid exposure compared to TCPC (OR 7.2, 95% CI of 2.1-24.2, P = 0.001). Transcatheter PDA device closure is associated with significantly lower neonatal opioid exposure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PDA关闭方法对早产儿手术期间阿片类药物使用的影响,三级儿科医疗保健系统的横断面回顾。
目的:研究明确关闭PDA的技术与早产儿术中阿片类药物使用的关系。一项回顾性队列研究,包括所有早产儿和PDA患者,他们在2020年2月至2022年12月期间接受了手术结扎(SL)或在2020年8月至2023年2月期间接受了经导管PDA关闭(TCPC)。系统量化两组患者术中及术后阿片类药物使用情况,并对1:1倾向评分匹配前后进行比较。我们假设早产儿和接受TCPC的婴儿与接受SL的婴儿相比,手术期间阿片类药物暴露的总体减少。该研究包括SL组的52名早产儿和TCPC组的74名早产儿。倾向评分匹配后,接受TCPC的婴儿术中(4.33 vs 5.99µg/kg, P = 0.037)和术后(0.09 vs 0.32 mg/kg, P < 0.001)阿片类药物的含量显著降低。接受TCPC的婴儿暴露于术后阿片类药物的比例明显较低(60.8% vs 92.3%, P =
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
National Trends and Disparities in Congenital Heart Disease Mortality in the United States, 1999-2024. Epicardial Fat is Associated with Ventricular Dilation in Patients After the Fontan Operation. Prediction of Symptoms and Evaluation of Surgical Indications After Birth Based on Tracheal Morphology of Double Aortic Arch. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Pediatric Post Heart Transplant Recipients with Advanced CAV: Delaying the Inevitable. Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Hemodialysis in Infants Undergoing Congenital Heart Surgery in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1