Rhetorics and Realities of Access in Community Mental Health Care.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1111/nin.70014
Katerina Melino, Janet Rankin, Joanne Olson, Jude Spiers, Carla Hilario
{"title":"Rhetorics and Realities of Access in Community Mental Health Care.","authors":"Katerina Melino, Janet Rankin, Joanne Olson, Jude Spiers, Carla Hilario","doi":"10.1111/nin.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent discourse emphasizes the need to integrate social and structural determinants of health-such as poverty, violence, houselessness, and discrimination-into mental health care service design and delivery. This study investigates how psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners (PMHNPs) navigate the conflicting demands of an efficiently organized clinic and the realities of patients experiencing chronic mental illness along with structural adversity. Using an institutional ethnographic approach, this research focused on the everyday work practices of nine PMHNPs in outpatient community mental health clinics in a major American city. The findings revealed disjunctures within two powerful discourses related to patient access to care that circulate in mental health settings: (1) \"every door is an open door,\" and (2) \"meeting people where they are.\" PMHNPs believe in the values promoted by the rhetoric while also being required to work outside institutional structures to meet real patient needs. By illustrating how the institutional coordination expected to improve health systems overlooks PMHNPs' expert knowledge, we highlight how addressing the \"structural determinants of health\" in clinical care for people with serious mental illnesses remains an ideological aspiration. We call for a reevaluation of mental health care practices and systemic transformation through the informed, ground-level interventions of PMHNPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49727,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Inquiry","volume":"32 2","pages":"e70014"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.70014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent discourse emphasizes the need to integrate social and structural determinants of health-such as poverty, violence, houselessness, and discrimination-into mental health care service design and delivery. This study investigates how psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners (PMHNPs) navigate the conflicting demands of an efficiently organized clinic and the realities of patients experiencing chronic mental illness along with structural adversity. Using an institutional ethnographic approach, this research focused on the everyday work practices of nine PMHNPs in outpatient community mental health clinics in a major American city. The findings revealed disjunctures within two powerful discourses related to patient access to care that circulate in mental health settings: (1) "every door is an open door," and (2) "meeting people where they are." PMHNPs believe in the values promoted by the rhetoric while also being required to work outside institutional structures to meet real patient needs. By illustrating how the institutional coordination expected to improve health systems overlooks PMHNPs' expert knowledge, we highlight how addressing the "structural determinants of health" in clinical care for people with serious mental illnesses remains an ideological aspiration. We call for a reevaluation of mental health care practices and systemic transformation through the informed, ground-level interventions of PMHNPs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区心理健康护理的修辞与现实。
最近的论述强调需要将健康的社会和结构决定因素(如贫困、暴力、无家可归和歧视)纳入精神卫生保健服务的设计和提供。本研究调查了精神科-心理健康执业护士(PMHNPs)如何在有效组织的诊所和经历慢性精神疾病以及结构性逆境的患者现实的冲突需求中进行导航。采用制度人种学方法,本研究集中在美国一个主要城市的门诊社区精神卫生诊所的9名PMHNPs的日常工作实践。研究结果揭示了在精神卫生机构中与患者获得护理相关的两种强有力的话语中的脱节:(1)“每扇门都是敞开的”,以及(2)“和人们在哪里见面。”PMHNPs相信口头宣传的价值观,同时也被要求在体制结构之外工作,以满足患者的实际需求。通过说明旨在改善卫生系统的机构协调如何忽视了PMHNPs的专业知识,我们强调了如何在严重精神疾病患者的临床护理中解决“健康的结构性决定因素”仍然是一种意识形态愿望。我们呼吁重新评估精神卫生保健做法,并通过PMHNPs知情的基层干预措施进行系统改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Inquiry
Nursing Inquiry 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Inquiry aims to stimulate examination of nursing''s current and emerging practices, conditions and contexts within an expanding international community of ideas. The journal aspires to excite thinking and stimulate action toward a preferred future for health and healthcare by encouraging critical reflection and lively debate on matters affecting and influenced by nursing from a range of disciplinary angles, scientific perspectives, analytic approaches, social locations and philosophical positions.
期刊最新文献
Visibility and Invisibility of Nurses in Hospital Settings: An Analysis Based on the Sociologies of Ignorance and of Absences. When Care Colludes: Nursing and Medical Misogyny. Tug of War Over Power: A Case Study on the Development of Professional-Informal Caregiver Tensions in Residential Dementia Care. Panarchy: From Ecological Theory to Mental Healthcare Practice. Tooling Up Nursing Research: Ethical Tensions Within Psychometric Scale Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1