Stirring the Sleeping Giant? an Evaluation of a Planetary Health Political Action Sequential Simulation for Nursing Students.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1111/nin.70017
Lydia Mainey, Ryan Essex, Philip Gurnett, Sarah Richardson
{"title":"Stirring the Sleeping Giant? an Evaluation of a Planetary Health Political Action Sequential Simulation for Nursing Students.","authors":"Lydia Mainey, Ryan Essex, Philip Gurnett, Sarah Richardson","doi":"10.1111/nin.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The need for nurses to be political is as great as ever, however, nursing has a complicated relationship with politics and political action. This paper examines the impact of a sequential simulation learning activity that sought to transform students' values and attitudes towards political action in addressing Planetary Health issues. Adult and adult mental health nursing students from two British universities participated in the Political Action Sequential Simulation which had three scenarios related to either water or air pollution. Scenario one was clinical, while scenarios two and three were community- and policy-based, respectively. We used a pre-post design to gauge attitudes and values both before and after the intervention. Outcomes measures included Nurse Professional Value Scale-3, Political Efficacy - Short Scale, Perceived Political Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form, Social Justice Scale and Internal Environmental Locus of Control scale. Of the 256 students who undertook the activity, 75 completed both pre and post-measures. Significant shifts across all scales except the social justice scale were found, meaning that students' attitudes towards political action, their beliefs in their ability to take political action, and in particular, action related to the environment shifted significantly after the sequential simulation. We discuss these results in the context of the broader literature, reflect on some of the reasons why these shifts occurred and consider the implications for nursing education and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49727,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Inquiry","volume":"32 2","pages":"e70017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need for nurses to be political is as great as ever, however, nursing has a complicated relationship with politics and political action. This paper examines the impact of a sequential simulation learning activity that sought to transform students' values and attitudes towards political action in addressing Planetary Health issues. Adult and adult mental health nursing students from two British universities participated in the Political Action Sequential Simulation which had three scenarios related to either water or air pollution. Scenario one was clinical, while scenarios two and three were community- and policy-based, respectively. We used a pre-post design to gauge attitudes and values both before and after the intervention. Outcomes measures included Nurse Professional Value Scale-3, Political Efficacy - Short Scale, Perceived Political Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form, Social Justice Scale and Internal Environmental Locus of Control scale. Of the 256 students who undertook the activity, 75 completed both pre and post-measures. Significant shifts across all scales except the social justice scale were found, meaning that students' attitudes towards political action, their beliefs in their ability to take political action, and in particular, action related to the environment shifted significantly after the sequential simulation. We discuss these results in the context of the broader literature, reflect on some of the reasons why these shifts occurred and consider the implications for nursing education and practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唤醒沉睡的巨人?护生行星健康政治行动序贯模拟之评估。
护士对政治的需求一如既往地强烈,然而,护理与政治和政治行动有着复杂的关系。本文探讨了一系列模拟学习活动的影响,该活动旨在改变学生对解决行星健康问题的政治行动的价值观和态度。来自两所英国大学的成人和成人心理健康护理专业的学生参加了政治行动顺序模拟,该模拟有三个与水或空气污染有关的场景。情景1是临床的,而情景2和情景3分别是基于社区和政策的。我们使用了前后设计来测量干预前后的态度和价值观。结果测量包括护士职业价值量表-3、政治效能-短量表、感知政治自我效能-短量表、社会公正量表和内环境控制点量表。在参加这项活动的256名学生中,有75名完成了测试前后的测试。除社会正义量表外,所有量表都发生了显著变化,这意味着学生对政治行动的态度,他们对自己采取政治行动能力的信念,特别是与环境有关的行动在顺序模拟后发生了显著变化。我们在更广泛的文献背景下讨论这些结果,反思这些转变发生的一些原因,并考虑对护理教育和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Inquiry
Nursing Inquiry 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Inquiry aims to stimulate examination of nursing''s current and emerging practices, conditions and contexts within an expanding international community of ideas. The journal aspires to excite thinking and stimulate action toward a preferred future for health and healthcare by encouraging critical reflection and lively debate on matters affecting and influenced by nursing from a range of disciplinary angles, scientific perspectives, analytic approaches, social locations and philosophical positions.
期刊最新文献
Visibility and Invisibility of Nurses in Hospital Settings: An Analysis Based on the Sociologies of Ignorance and of Absences. When Care Colludes: Nursing and Medical Misogyny. Tug of War Over Power: A Case Study on the Development of Professional-Informal Caregiver Tensions in Residential Dementia Care. Panarchy: From Ecological Theory to Mental Healthcare Practice. Tooling Up Nursing Research: Ethical Tensions Within Psychometric Scale Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1