Safety of Avacopan for the Treatment of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: Combined Data From Three Clinical Trials.

IF 2.8 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY ACR open rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1002/acr2.70001
Peter A Merkel, Michael D George, Huibin Yue, Tamara Popov, Andreas Kronbichler, Mark A Little, David R W Jayne
{"title":"Safety of Avacopan for the Treatment of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: Combined Data From Three Clinical Trials.","authors":"Peter A Merkel, Michael D George, Huibin Yue, Tamara Popov, Andreas Kronbichler, Mark A Little, David R W Jayne","doi":"10.1002/acr2.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to report the safety of avacopan, an oral selective complement C5a receptor antagonist, using pooled data from clinical trials in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (granulomatosis with polyangiitis [GPA] or microscopic polyangiitis [MPA]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were included from two phase 2 (CLEAR [NCT01363388] and CLASSIC [NCT02222155]) and one phase 3 (ADVOCATE [NCT02994927]) double-blind randomized controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of avacopan with active non-avacopan control regimens to induce remission in patients with GPA or MPA. In CLEAR and ADVOCATE, avacopan-treated patients received either no or lower doses of study-supplied prednisone than the control groups; in CLASSIC, all groups received the same dose of study-supplied prednisone. Assessments included rates of exposure-adjusted adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs of special interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 439 patients with GPA or MPA (avacopan: n = 239; non-avacopan: n = 200) were included. The exposure-adjusted rates of AEs, SAEs, white blood cell (WBC) count reductions, and infections were lower with avacopan versus control (between-group differences in rate per 100 patient-years -151.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) -218.6 to -85.3], -20.8 [95% CI -38.3 to -3.3], -11.6 [95% CI -22.2 to -1.2], and -24.3 [95% CI -48.5 to -0.1], respectively). SAEs associated with hepatic function abnormalities occurred in 4.4% of the avacopan group and 2.8% of the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In clinical trials of GPA or MPA, use of avacopan was associated with fewer AEs, SAEs, and WBC count reductions and fewer infections than non-avacopan treatment. Safety data support the use of avacopan in patients with GPA or MPA.</p>","PeriodicalId":93845,"journal":{"name":"ACR open rheumatology","volume":"7 4","pages":"e70001"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR open rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to report the safety of avacopan, an oral selective complement C5a receptor antagonist, using pooled data from clinical trials in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (granulomatosis with polyangiitis [GPA] or microscopic polyangiitis [MPA]).

Methods: Data were included from two phase 2 (CLEAR [NCT01363388] and CLASSIC [NCT02222155]) and one phase 3 (ADVOCATE [NCT02994927]) double-blind randomized controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of avacopan with active non-avacopan control regimens to induce remission in patients with GPA or MPA. In CLEAR and ADVOCATE, avacopan-treated patients received either no or lower doses of study-supplied prednisone than the control groups; in CLASSIC, all groups received the same dose of study-supplied prednisone. Assessments included rates of exposure-adjusted adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs of special interest.

Results: Overall, 439 patients with GPA or MPA (avacopan: n = 239; non-avacopan: n = 200) were included. The exposure-adjusted rates of AEs, SAEs, white blood cell (WBC) count reductions, and infections were lower with avacopan versus control (between-group differences in rate per 100 patient-years -151.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) -218.6 to -85.3], -20.8 [95% CI -38.3 to -3.3], -11.6 [95% CI -22.2 to -1.2], and -24.3 [95% CI -48.5 to -0.1], respectively). SAEs associated with hepatic function abnormalities occurred in 4.4% of the avacopan group and 2.8% of the control group.

Conclusion: In clinical trials of GPA or MPA, use of avacopan was associated with fewer AEs, SAEs, and WBC count reductions and fewer infections than non-avacopan treatment. Safety data support the use of avacopan in patients with GPA or MPA.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Avacopan治疗抗中性粒细胞细胞质抗体相关血管炎的安全性:来自三个临床试验的综合数据
目的:本研究旨在通过汇总抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)相关血管炎(肉芽肿伴多血管炎[GPA]或显微多血管炎[MPA])患者的临床试验数据,报道口服补体C5a受体拮抗剂avacopan的安全性。方法:数据来自两项2期(CLEAR [NCT01363388]和CLASSIC [NCT02222155])和一项3期(ADVOCATE [NCT02994927])双盲随机对照试验,比较avacopan与非avacopan有效对照方案诱导GPA或MPA患者缓解的安全性和有效性。在CLEAR和ADVOCATE试验中,与对照组相比,阿瓦库泮治疗的患者要么不接受强的松治疗,要么接受更低剂量的强的松治疗;在CLASSIC中,所有组接受相同剂量的研究提供的强的松。评估包括暴露调整不良事件(ae)、严重不良事件(sae)和特别关注的不良事件发生率。结果:总体而言,439例GPA或MPA患者(avacopan: n = 239;非空腔:n = 200)。与对照组相比,avacopan组的ae、SAEs、白细胞(WBC)计数减少和感染的暴露调整率更低(每100患者年发生率组间差异分别为-151.9[95%可信区间(CI) -218.6至-85.3]、-20.8 [95% CI -38.3至-3.3]、-11.6 [95% CI -22.2至-1.2]和-24.3 [95% CI -48.5至-0.1])。与肝功能异常相关的SAEs发生率为阿伐科泮组的4.4%,对照组的2.8%。结论:在GPA或MPA的临床试验中,与不使用avacopan治疗相比,使用avacopan与更少的ae、sae、WBC计数减少和感染相关。安全性数据支持在GPA或MPA患者中使用avacopan。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transition From Juvenile Dermatomyositis to Spondyloarthritis: A Novel Overlapping Inflammatory Phenotype. Distinct by Design: Unraveling the Unique Clinical and Transcriptomic Identity of Juvenile Scleromyositis Overlap Compared to Juvenile Systemic Sclerosis and Juvenile Dermatomyositis: Implications for Care and Pathogenesis. Anti-CD146 Autoantibodies: The First Biologic Markers Associated With Occupational Exposure in Systemic Sclerosis. Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients With Preexisting Autoimmune Vasculitis. Longitudinal Assessment of the Juvenile Systemic Sclerosis Severity Score: Application in the National Registry for Childhood Onset Scleroderma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1