Intraoperative Irrigation and Topical Antibiotic Use Fail to Reduce Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rates: A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Study

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-05 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.062
Joseph F. Seta MD , Martin J. Weaver MD , Brian R. Hallstrom MD , Huiyong T. Zheng PhD , Devon M. Larese MSN , Elizabeth A. Dailey MD , David C. Markel MD
{"title":"Intraoperative Irrigation and Topical Antibiotic Use Fail to Reduce Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rates: A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Study","authors":"Joseph F. Seta MD ,&nbsp;Martin J. Weaver MD ,&nbsp;Brian R. Hallstrom MD ,&nbsp;Huiyong T. Zheng PhD ,&nbsp;Devon M. Larese MSN ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Dailey MD ,&nbsp;David C. Markel MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Periprosthetic joint infections remain a major complication in total joint arthroplasty. Tremendous efforts made intraoperatively to prevent periprosthetic joint infection during primary procedures include antiseptics or antibiotics in irrigation solutions. This study analyzed the incidence of postoperative infection in relation to use of irrigation solutions and antibiotic powder.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We reviewed primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) cases from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative between January 2019 and December 2022. Data on irrigation solutions were categorized by those containing antibiotics, chlorhexidine-gluconate, povidone-iodine, or other substances, compared to normal saline. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for various factors such as age, body mass index, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, smoking, and more. There were 67,871 THA and 105,963 TKA cases analyzed, with an overall infection rate of 0.6% (confidence interval: 0.6 to 0.7, n = 420) for THA and 0.4% (0.36 to 0.43, n = 419) for TKA within 90 days postsurgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were statistical differences between the use of normal saline alone versus other irrigation solutions in THA, including povidone and others. For TKA, there was a statistically significant difference with lower infection rates using normal saline alone than multiple types, chlorhexidine-gluconate, and povidone. Notably, the use of nonsaline irrigation increased over the study period.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was no reduction in 90-day infection rates for primary THA or TKA with irrigation additives. Higher infection rates were noted with povidone than saline for THA and TKA, potentially due to selection bias or local adverse tissue effects. Topical powders did not improve infection control. While irrigation is strongly recommended in all patients having TKA or THA, multiple irrigation solutions were not correlated with lower infection rates, suggesting importance of patient selection and optimization over irrigation type.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":"40 8","pages":"Pages S297-S303.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540325002992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Periprosthetic joint infections remain a major complication in total joint arthroplasty. Tremendous efforts made intraoperatively to prevent periprosthetic joint infection during primary procedures include antiseptics or antibiotics in irrigation solutions. This study analyzed the incidence of postoperative infection in relation to use of irrigation solutions and antibiotic powder.

Methods

We reviewed primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) cases from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative between January 2019 and December 2022. Data on irrigation solutions were categorized by those containing antibiotics, chlorhexidine-gluconate, povidone-iodine, or other substances, compared to normal saline. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for various factors such as age, body mass index, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, smoking, and more. There were 67,871 THA and 105,963 TKA cases analyzed, with an overall infection rate of 0.6% (confidence interval: 0.6 to 0.7, n = 420) for THA and 0.4% (0.36 to 0.43, n = 419) for TKA within 90 days postsurgery.

Results

There were statistical differences between the use of normal saline alone versus other irrigation solutions in THA, including povidone and others. For TKA, there was a statistically significant difference with lower infection rates using normal saline alone than multiple types, chlorhexidine-gluconate, and povidone. Notably, the use of nonsaline irrigation increased over the study period.

Conclusions

There was no reduction in 90-day infection rates for primary THA or TKA with irrigation additives. Higher infection rates were noted with povidone than saline for THA and TKA, potentially due to selection bias or local adverse tissue effects. Topical powders did not improve infection control. While irrigation is strongly recommended in all patients having TKA or THA, multiple irrigation solutions were not correlated with lower infection rates, suggesting importance of patient selection and optimization over irrigation type.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中冲洗和局部使用抗生素不能降低早期假体周围关节的感染率:密歇根关节置换术注册中心协作质量倡议研究。
目的:人工关节周围感染(PJI)是全关节置换术的主要并发症。术中为预防初级手术期间的PJI所做的巨大努力包括在冲洗液中使用防腐剂或抗生素。本研究分析了冲洗液和抗生素粉的使用与术后感染发生率的关系。方法:我们回顾了2019年1月至2022年12月期间密歇根关节置换术登记处协作质量倡议(MARCQI)的原发性全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)病例。与生理盐水相比,冲洗液的数据按含有抗生素、葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)、聚维酮碘或其他物质进行分类。对年龄、体重指数(BMI)、性别、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、吸烟等因素进行了调整后的Logistic回归分析。共分析THA 67,871例,TKA 105,963例,术后90天内THA总感染率为0.6% (CI[置信区间]:0.6 ~ 0.7,n = 420), TKA总感染率为0.4% (0.36 ~ 0.43,n = 419)。结果:人工髋关节置换术中单独使用生理盐水与其他冲洗液(包括聚维酮和其他)有统计学差异。对于TKA,与多种类型、CHG和聚维酮相比,单独使用生理盐水的感染率较低,差异有统计学意义。值得注意的是,在研究期间,非盐水灌溉的使用有所增加。结论:原发全髋关节置换术或全髋关节置换术使用灌溉添加剂并没有降低90天感染率。与生理盐水相比,在THA和TKA中使用聚维酮的感染率更高,可能是由于选择偏差或局部不良组织效应。局部粉末不能改善感染控制。虽然强烈建议所有TKA或THA患者进行冲洗,但多种冲洗溶液与较低感染率无关,这表明患者选择和优化冲洗类型比冲洗类型更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
期刊最新文献
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Periprosthetic Joint Infection Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Agreement of Patient Responses Between Electronic- and Paper- Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Complications and Readmissions Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study. Failure Incidence and Predictors Following Manipulation Under Anesthesia for the Stiff Total Knee Arthroplasty. Repeat Exposure to Silver-impregnated Dressing Does Not Increase Risk of Allergic Contact Dermatitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1