High-dose statins for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Annals of Saudi medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2025.112
Muhammed Siddique Shahid, Mariam Safwan Bourgleh, Adel Alharfi, Shahad Albariqi, Lamia Albalawi, Rema Alohali, Turki Albaqami, Moaz Safwan Bourgleh
{"title":"High-dose statins for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Muhammed Siddique Shahid, Mariam Safwan Bourgleh, Adel Alharfi, Shahad Albariqi, Lamia Albalawi, Rema Alohali, Turki Albaqami, Moaz Safwan Bourgleh","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2025.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ischemic stroke (IS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality, with fatal outcomes increased with recurrent strokes. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the safety and efficacy of high-dose statins for secondary IS prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was regestered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024574088). Cochrane methodology was followed in this review and comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrial.gov, to include all RCTs conducted from 2004 to 2024, comparing high-dose statins (simvastatin ≥40 mg, atorvastatin ≥40 mg, and rosuvastatin ≥20 mg) with low-dose statins, placebo, or standard care. Outcomes of this review were recurrent IS reduction and adverse events reported in RCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs involving 5,503 patients, with male patients ranging from 25.8% to 81.6% were included. Compared to controls, high-dose statins did not significantly reduce risks for secondary IS (OR 0.78, 95% CI [0.61, 1.00], <i>P</i>=.05) and hemorrhagic stroke (OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.56, 1.29], <i>P</i>=.45). Furthermore, no differences were observed in mortality rates and adverse events between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with high dose statins didn't reduce the risk of stroke recurrence or improve mortality, though further research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":93875,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi medicine","volume":"45 2","pages":"112-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12542917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2025.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ischemic stroke (IS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality, with fatal outcomes increased with recurrent strokes. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the safety and efficacy of high-dose statins for secondary IS prevention.

Methods: This review was regestered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024574088). Cochrane methodology was followed in this review and comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrial.gov, to include all RCTs conducted from 2004 to 2024, comparing high-dose statins (simvastatin ≥40 mg, atorvastatin ≥40 mg, and rosuvastatin ≥20 mg) with low-dose statins, placebo, or standard care. Outcomes of this review were recurrent IS reduction and adverse events reported in RCTs.

Results: Nine RCTs involving 5,503 patients, with male patients ranging from 25.8% to 81.6% were included. Compared to controls, high-dose statins did not significantly reduce risks for secondary IS (OR 0.78, 95% CI [0.61, 1.00], P=.05) and hemorrhagic stroke (OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.56, 1.29], P=.45). Furthermore, no differences were observed in mortality rates and adverse events between groups.

Conclusion: Treatment with high dose statins didn't reduce the risk of stroke recurrence or improve mortality, though further research is needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大剂量他汀类药物预防缺血性卒中复发:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
缺血性脑卒中(IS)是致残和死亡的主要原因,致命的结果随着复发性脑卒中而增加。本系统综述和随机对照试验(rct)的荟萃分析评估了大剂量他汀类药物用于继发性IS预防的安全性和有效性。方法:本综述在PROSPERO注册(注册号:CRD42024574088)。本综述采用Cochrane方法学,并综合检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和clinicaltrials .gov,纳入2004年至2024年进行的所有rct,比较高剂量他汀类药物(辛伐他汀≥40mg、阿托伐他汀≥40mg和瑞舒伐他汀≥20mg)与低剂量他汀类药物、安慰剂或标准治疗。本综述的结果是rct中报告的复发性IS减少和不良事件。结果:纳入9项rct,共5503例患者,男性患者占25.8% ~ 81.6%。与对照组相比,高剂量他汀类药物并没有显著降低继发性IS (OR 0.78, 95% CI [0.61, 1.00], P= 0.05)和出血性卒中(OR 0.85, 95% CI [0.56, 1.29], P= 0.45)的风险。此外,两组之间的死亡率和不良事件没有观察到差异。结论:大剂量他汀类药物治疗并没有降低卒中复发风险或提高死亡率,但需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond the ports: outcomes in uni-port vs. multi-port video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lung resections. Investigation of the susceptibility rates to ceftazidime-avibactam and colistin, clonal relationships, and clinical data of patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates detected in the ICUs of a hospital in İstanbul. Impact of ileostomy creation on apixaban plasma concentrations: a retrospective case-series. Diagnostic yield of pre- versus post-biopsy bronchial washing in endobronchial cancer: Impact of procedural sequence. Liver measurements on computed tomography: a guide for day-to-day practice in the Saudi population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1