{"title":"Accuracy of Clinical Assessments with Virtual Care in Outpatient Neurological Setting.","authors":"Julia Pellegrino, Sara B Mitchell, Liesly Lee","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2025.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Virtual neurological assessments were increasingly used during the COVID-19 pandemic with relatively unknown accuracy. Clinical records were reviewed in a predominant multiple sclerosis outpatient clinic at an academic teaching hospital from March 23, 2020, to March 23, 2021. Patients assessed had an initial virtual assessment followed by a subsequent in-person evaluation. Among 1036 patients analyzed, 27.8% (<i>n</i> = 288) of consultations were conducted via video teleconferencing and 72.2% (<i>n</i> = 748) via telephone. Overall, 86.2% of the consultations revealed congruent conclusions between virtual and in-person assessments. However, 13.8% (<i>n</i> = 143) of virtual consultations revealed clinical disparities, including 13.5% (<i>n</i> = 39) video and 13.9% (<i>n</i> = 104) telephone.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.63","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Virtual neurological assessments were increasingly used during the COVID-19 pandemic with relatively unknown accuracy. Clinical records were reviewed in a predominant multiple sclerosis outpatient clinic at an academic teaching hospital from March 23, 2020, to March 23, 2021. Patients assessed had an initial virtual assessment followed by a subsequent in-person evaluation. Among 1036 patients analyzed, 27.8% (n = 288) of consultations were conducted via video teleconferencing and 72.2% (n = 748) via telephone. Overall, 86.2% of the consultations revealed congruent conclusions between virtual and in-person assessments. However, 13.8% (n = 143) of virtual consultations revealed clinical disparities, including 13.5% (n = 39) video and 13.9% (n = 104) telephone.
期刊介绍:
Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.