Clinical predictors of outcome after pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) in non-stroke related neurogenic dysphagia after mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy: results from subgroup analysis of PHADER study.

IF 3.2 Q2 Medicine Neurological research and practice Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1186/s42466-025-00380-5
Ivy Cheng, Philip M Bath, Shaheen Hamdy, Paul Muhle, Satish Mistry, Rainer Dziewas, Sonja Suntrup-Krüger
{"title":"Clinical predictors of outcome after pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) in non-stroke related neurogenic dysphagia after mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy: results from subgroup analysis of PHADER study.","authors":"Ivy Cheng, Philip M Bath, Shaheen Hamdy, Paul Muhle, Satish Mistry, Rainer Dziewas, Sonja Suntrup-Krüger","doi":"10.1186/s42466-025-00380-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) is a neurostimulation intervention that can improve swallowing and facilitate decannulation in tracheotomised stroke patients with dysphagia. The PHAryngeal electrical stimulation for treatment of neurogenic Dysphagia European Registry (PHADER) study found that PES can reduce dysphagia severity in patients with neurogenic (non-stroke) dysphagia who required mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy. However, the predictive factors for treatment success among these patients remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a subgroup analysis using data from PHADER, with a focus on non-stroke participants who had required mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy. Multiple linear regression was performed to predict treatment success, as measured in improvement in dysphagia severity rating scale (DSRS) total score, accounting for age, sex, time from diagnosis to PES, PES perceptual threshold and PES stimulation intensity at the first session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven participants (mean[standard deviation] age: 63.6[15.5] years; male: 70.2%) were included in the analysis. These comprised traumatic brain injury (22[38.6%]), critical illness polyneuropathy (15[26.4%]), and other neurological conditions that caused dysphagia (20[35.0%]). Regression analyses identified that a lower PES perceptual threshold at the first session (p = 0.027) and early intervention (p = 0.004) were significant predictors associated with treatment success at Day 9 and 3 months post PES respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified two predictive factors associated with successful PES treatment in patients with neurogenic (non-stroke) dysphagia requiring mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy: a lower PES perceptual threshold at the first session and early intervention. These predictors provide critical guidance for optimizing clinical decision-making in managing non-stroke neurogenic dysphagia patients in critical care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-025-00380-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) is a neurostimulation intervention that can improve swallowing and facilitate decannulation in tracheotomised stroke patients with dysphagia. The PHAryngeal electrical stimulation for treatment of neurogenic Dysphagia European Registry (PHADER) study found that PES can reduce dysphagia severity in patients with neurogenic (non-stroke) dysphagia who required mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy. However, the predictive factors for treatment success among these patients remain unclear.

Methods: We conducted a subgroup analysis using data from PHADER, with a focus on non-stroke participants who had required mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy. Multiple linear regression was performed to predict treatment success, as measured in improvement in dysphagia severity rating scale (DSRS) total score, accounting for age, sex, time from diagnosis to PES, PES perceptual threshold and PES stimulation intensity at the first session.

Results: Fifty-seven participants (mean[standard deviation] age: 63.6[15.5] years; male: 70.2%) were included in the analysis. These comprised traumatic brain injury (22[38.6%]), critical illness polyneuropathy (15[26.4%]), and other neurological conditions that caused dysphagia (20[35.0%]). Regression analyses identified that a lower PES perceptual threshold at the first session (p = 0.027) and early intervention (p = 0.004) were significant predictors associated with treatment success at Day 9 and 3 months post PES respectively.

Conclusions: We identified two predictive factors associated with successful PES treatment in patients with neurogenic (non-stroke) dysphagia requiring mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy: a lower PES perceptual threshold at the first session and early intervention. These predictors provide critical guidance for optimizing clinical decision-making in managing non-stroke neurogenic dysphagia patients in critical care settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非脑卒中相关神经源性吞咽困难机械通气和气管切开术后咽电刺激(PES)后预后的临床预测因素:来自PHADER研究亚组分析的结果
背景:咽部电刺激(PES)是一种神经刺激干预,可以改善气管切开术卒中吞咽困难患者的吞咽和促进脱管。咽电刺激治疗神经性吞咽困难欧洲注册(PHADER)研究发现,PES可以降低需要机械通气和气管切开术的神经性(非卒中)吞咽困难患者的吞咽困难严重程度。然而,这些患者治疗成功的预测因素仍不清楚。方法:我们使用来自PHADER的数据进行了亚组分析,重点是需要机械通气和气管切开术的非卒中参与者。采用多元线性回归来预测治疗成功,以吞咽困难严重程度评定量表(DSRS)总分的改善来衡量,考虑年龄、性别、从诊断到PES的时间、PES感知阈值和第一次治疗时PES刺激强度。结果:57名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄:63.6[15.5]岁;男性:70.2%)纳入分析。其中包括外伤性脑损伤(22例[38.6%])、危重性多神经病变(15例[26.4%])和其他导致吞咽困难的神经系统疾病(20例[35.0%])。回归分析发现,第一次治疗时较低的PES感知阈值(p = 0.027)和早期干预(p = 0.004)分别是PES后第9天和3个月治疗成功的显著预测因素。结论:我们确定了两个与需要机械通气和气管切开术的神经源性(非卒中)吞咽困难患者PES治疗成功相关的预测因素:第一次治疗时较低的PES感知阈值和早期干预。这些预测因子为在重症监护环境中优化非脑卒中神经源性吞咽困难患者的临床决策提供了重要指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mapping neurogenic dysphagia diagnostics in Germany: accessibility, implementation practices, and barriers to swallowing endoscopy. Correction: Collaborative neurocardiology board meetings for decision-making in stroke care: a real-world experience. Letter to the editor, regarding "Acute care of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage", recently published by Shah and colleagues. Wearable sensor measurements in relation to clinical characteristics and mortality in patients with Parkinson's disease. Intracranial hemorrhage after ischemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants: results from a prospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1