Treatment delay significantly increases mortality in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY GeroScience Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1007/s11357-025-01648-z
Zoltan Ungvari, Mónika Fekete, János Tibor Fekete, Andrea Lehoczki, Annamaria Buda, Gyöngyi Munkácsy, Péter Varga, Anna Ungvari, Balázs Győrffy
{"title":"Treatment delay significantly increases mortality in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis","authors":"Zoltan Ungvari, Mónika Fekete, János Tibor Fekete, Andrea Lehoczki, Annamaria Buda, Gyöngyi Munkácsy, Péter Varga, Anna Ungvari, Balázs Győrffy","doi":"10.1007/s11357-025-01648-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Delaying the initiation of cancer treatment increases the risk of mortality, particularly in colorectal cancer (CRC), which is among the most common and deadliest malignancies. This study aims to explore the impact of treatment delays on mortality in CRC. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published between 2000 and 2025. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models with inverse variance method to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for both overall and cancer-specific survival at 4-, 8-, and 12-week treatment delay intervals, with heterogeneity assessed through <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>-statistics and publication bias evaluated using funnel plots and Egger’s test. A total of 20 relevant studies were included in the meta-analysis. The analyses of all patients demonstrated a progressively increasing risk of 12–39% with longer treatment delays (4 weeks, HR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08–1.16; 8 weeks, HR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16–1.34; 12 weeks, HR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.25–1.55). In particular, incrementally higher hazard ratios were observed for all–cause mortality at 4 weeks (HR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09–1.18), 8 weeks (HR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.20–1.39), and 12 weeks (HR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.31–1.64). In contrast, cancer-specific survival analysis showed a similar trend but did not reach statistical significance (4 weeks, HR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.98–1.18; 8 weeks, HR = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.95–1.39; 12 weeks, HR = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.93–1.63). Treatment delays in colorectal cancer patients were associated with progressively worsening overall survival, with each 4-week delay increment leading to a substantially higher mortality risk. This study suggests that timely treatment initiation should be prioritized in clinical practice, as these efforts can lead to substantial improvements in survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":12730,"journal":{"name":"GeroScience","volume":"138 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeroScience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-01648-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delaying the initiation of cancer treatment increases the risk of mortality, particularly in colorectal cancer (CRC), which is among the most common and deadliest malignancies. This study aims to explore the impact of treatment delays on mortality in CRC. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published between 2000 and 2025. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models with inverse variance method to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for both overall and cancer-specific survival at 4-, 8-, and 12-week treatment delay intervals, with heterogeneity assessed through I2-statistics and publication bias evaluated using funnel plots and Egger’s test. A total of 20 relevant studies were included in the meta-analysis. The analyses of all patients demonstrated a progressively increasing risk of 12–39% with longer treatment delays (4 weeks, HR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08–1.16; 8 weeks, HR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16–1.34; 12 weeks, HR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.25–1.55). In particular, incrementally higher hazard ratios were observed for all–cause mortality at 4 weeks (HR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09–1.18), 8 weeks (HR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.20–1.39), and 12 weeks (HR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.31–1.64). In contrast, cancer-specific survival analysis showed a similar trend but did not reach statistical significance (4 weeks, HR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.98–1.18; 8 weeks, HR = 1.15; 95% CI, 0.95–1.39; 12 weeks, HR = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.93–1.63). Treatment delays in colorectal cancer patients were associated with progressively worsening overall survival, with each 4-week delay increment leading to a substantially higher mortality risk. This study suggests that timely treatment initiation should be prioritized in clinical practice, as these efforts can lead to substantial improvements in survival rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延迟治疗会明显增加结直肠癌患者的死亡率:一项荟萃分析
延迟开始癌症治疗会增加死亡风险,特别是结肠直肠癌(CRC),这是最常见和最致命的恶性肿瘤之一。本研究旨在探讨治疗延迟对结直肠癌死亡率的影响。在PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus中对2000年至2025年间发表的研究进行了系统的文献检索。meta分析采用随机效应模型和反方差法计算4周、8周和12周治疗延迟间隔的总生存率和癌症特异性生存率的风险比(hr),异质性通过i2统计评估,发表偏倚通过漏斗图和Egger检验评估。meta分析共纳入20项相关研究。对所有患者的分析表明,随着治疗延迟时间的延长,风险逐渐增加12-39%(4周,HR = 1.12;95% ci, 1.08-1.16;8周,HR = 1.24;95% ci, 1.16-1.34;12周,HR = 1.39;95% ci, 1.25-1.55)。特别是,观察到4周时全因死亡率的风险比逐渐升高(HR = 1.14;95% CI, 1.09-1.18), 8周(HR = 1.29;95% CI, 1.20-1.39)和12周(HR = 1.47;95% ci, 1.31-1.64)。相比之下,肿瘤特异性生存分析显示类似趋势,但未达到统计学意义(4周,HR = 1.07;95% ci, 0.98-1.18;8周,HR = 1.15;95% ci, 0.95-1.39;12周,HR = 1.23;95% ci, 0.93-1.63)。结直肠癌患者的治疗延迟与总生存期的逐渐恶化相关,每延迟4周导致死亡风险显著增加。这项研究表明,在临床实践中应优先考虑及时开始治疗,因为这些努力可以显著提高生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GeroScience
GeroScience Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: GeroScience is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles related to research in the biology of aging and research on biomedical applications that impact aging. The scope of articles to be considered include evolutionary biology, biophysics, genetics, genomics, proteomics, molecular biology, cell biology, biochemistry, endocrinology, immunology, physiology, pharmacology, neuroscience, and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Knockdown of the fly spliceosome component Rbp1 (orthologue of SRSF1) extends lifespan. Association between cagemate number and risk of death in mice: a time-varying covariate analysis using Cox frailty models. Aging kidney is associated with metabolic rewiring and epigenetic reprogramming. Frailty and postoperative risk in geriatric neurosurgery: a prospective cohort study using multidimensional assessment. Review: Systemic inflammation after stroke. Therapy and perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1