Exploring relationships among smoking cessation app use, smoking behavioral outcomes, and pharmacotherapy utilization among individuals who smoke cigarettes

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Addictive behaviors Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108354
Schuyler C. Lawson , Karin Kasza , R.Lorraine Collins , Richard J. O’Connor , Gregory G. Homish
{"title":"Exploring relationships among smoking cessation app use, smoking behavioral outcomes, and pharmacotherapy utilization among individuals who smoke cigarettes","authors":"Schuyler C. Lawson ,&nbsp;Karin Kasza ,&nbsp;R.Lorraine Collins ,&nbsp;Richard J. O’Connor ,&nbsp;Gregory G. Homish","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Most individuals who smoke cigarettes are interested in quitting, but many are unable to quit. Fewer than one-third of individuals who smoke cigarettes attempt to quit using FDA-approved cessation methods, such as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and prescription medications. Smoking cessation apps (SCAs) provide individuals with personalized quit plans, information about smoking cessation treatments, craving management strategies, and other features. However, their relationship to NRT/prescription medication utilization and quit attempts is understudied.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a longitudinal secondary data analysis using a subset of adults who smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime, currently smoked every day or some days, and planned to quit within a year. This subset was drawn from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, a nationally representative cohort study. We utilized Generalizing Estimating Equation models to examine the longitudinal associations between SCA use initiation and the following outcomes across 2014–2019: NRT, prescription medications, and quit attempts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SCA use initiation was associated with greater odds of prescription medication utilization (AOR = 2.43, 95 % CI: 1.63, 3.64; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Likewise, SCA use initiation was associated with greater odds of making a quit attempt (AOR = 1.38, 95 % CI: 1.09, 1.76; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), but not NRT utilization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Among adults who regularly smoked cigarettes and had plans to quit, SCA use initiation was associated with prescription medication utilization and quit attempts but not NRT utilization. SCAs may have utility as a population-level intervention but specific features needed to be studied further.</div><div>Abbreviations: SCA, Smoking Cessation App; NRT, Nicotine Replacement Therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 108354"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460325001157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Most individuals who smoke cigarettes are interested in quitting, but many are unable to quit. Fewer than one-third of individuals who smoke cigarettes attempt to quit using FDA-approved cessation methods, such as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and prescription medications. Smoking cessation apps (SCAs) provide individuals with personalized quit plans, information about smoking cessation treatments, craving management strategies, and other features. However, their relationship to NRT/prescription medication utilization and quit attempts is understudied.

Methods

We conducted a longitudinal secondary data analysis using a subset of adults who smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime, currently smoked every day or some days, and planned to quit within a year. This subset was drawn from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, a nationally representative cohort study. We utilized Generalizing Estimating Equation models to examine the longitudinal associations between SCA use initiation and the following outcomes across 2014–2019: NRT, prescription medications, and quit attempts.

Results

SCA use initiation was associated with greater odds of prescription medication utilization (AOR = 2.43, 95 % CI: 1.63, 3.64; p < 0.05). Likewise, SCA use initiation was associated with greater odds of making a quit attempt (AOR = 1.38, 95 % CI: 1.09, 1.76; p < 0.01), but not NRT utilization.

Conclusion

Among adults who regularly smoked cigarettes and had plans to quit, SCA use initiation was associated with prescription medication utilization and quit attempts but not NRT utilization. SCAs may have utility as a population-level intervention but specific features needed to be studied further.
Abbreviations: SCA, Smoking Cessation App; NRT, Nicotine Replacement Therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索吸烟个体中戒烟应用程序使用、吸烟行为结果和药物治疗使用之间的关系
大多数吸烟的人都对戒烟感兴趣,但许多人无法戒烟。不到三分之一的吸烟者试图通过fda批准的戒烟方法戒烟,比如尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)和处方药。戒烟应用程序(sca)为个人提供个性化的戒烟计划、有关戒烟治疗的信息、渴望管理策略和其他功能。然而,它们与NRT/处方药使用和戒烟尝试的关系尚未得到充分研究。方法:我们对一组成年人进行了纵向二次数据分析,这些成年人一生中至少吸烟100支,目前每天或几天吸烟,并计划在一年内戒烟。这一子集来自烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究,这是一项具有全国代表性的队列研究。我们利用广义估计方程模型来研究2014-2019年SCA使用起始与以下结果之间的纵向关联:NRT、处方药和戒烟尝试。结果sca开始使用与处方药使用几率较高相关(AOR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.63, 3.64;p & lt;0.05)。同样,SCA使用开始与更大的戒烟尝试几率相关(AOR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.76;p & lt;0.01),而非NRT利用率。结论在经常吸烟并有戒烟计划的成年人中,SCA使用起始与处方药使用和戒烟尝试相关,但与NRT使用无关。sca作为一种人口水平的干预措施可能具有效用,但具体特征需要进一步研究。缩写:SCA,戒烟App;尼古丁替代疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive behaviors
Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Synthesising the available evidence to identify the health impact of gambling harm and gambling problems Problematic cannabis use and attachment insecurities as Joint predictors of Depression: Cross-Sectional and longitudinal models Risk of opioid overdose during buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder in the fentanyl era Alcohol consumption patterns and Long-Term Anxiety: The influence of Sex, Age, and income
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1