Application of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Methane Concentrations in Pig Barns Using Biophysical Data

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1007/s11270-025-07954-8
Jayanta Kumar Basak, Bhola Paudel, Nibas Chandra Deb, Dae Yeong Kang, Mohammed Abdus Salam, Sanjay Saha Sonet, Hyeon Tae Kim
{"title":"Application of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Methane Concentrations in Pig Barns Using Biophysical Data","authors":"Jayanta Kumar Basak,&nbsp;Bhola Paudel,&nbsp;Nibas Chandra Deb,&nbsp;Dae Yeong Kang,&nbsp;Mohammed Abdus Salam,&nbsp;Sanjay Saha Sonet,&nbsp;Hyeon Tae Kim","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-07954-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The prediction of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) concentration is important for pig farming due to its environmental impact on pigs and farm workers. This study examined the utilization of machine learning algorithms, specifically multiple linear regression (MLR), XGBoost regression (XGB), and random forest regression (RFR), to predict CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations in pig barns during the growing-finishing stage of pigs. The dataset included five key input biophysical variables: feed intake (FI), pig mass (MP), carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) levels, temperature (T), and relative humidity (RH). Data was collected from three experimental pig barns during 2022 and 2023 to train and test the machine learning models. Among the three machine learning models, the RFR consistently outperformed both MLR and XGB in predicting CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations. The results demonstrated better performance by the RFR model in testing (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.81), with improvements in R<sup>2</sup> of up to 1.92% and 10.46%, as well as decreases in RMSE of up to 5.74% and 20.51%, compared to the XGB and MLR across the three input datasets. In terms of stability, MLR exhibited the maximum stability, followed by RFR and XGB. Sensitivity analysis found FI to be the most influential input variable for CH<sub>4</sub> concentration prediction, with the impact ranking being FI &gt; MP &gt; CO<sub>2</sub> &gt; T &gt; RH. This study emphasized the potential of machine learning models, particularly RFR, in predicting CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations using relevant input variables. These findings enhance understanding of CH<sub>4</sub> concentration, providing useful insights into pig production and environmental management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-07954-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prediction of methane (CH4) concentration is important for pig farming due to its environmental impact on pigs and farm workers. This study examined the utilization of machine learning algorithms, specifically multiple linear regression (MLR), XGBoost regression (XGB), and random forest regression (RFR), to predict CH4 concentrations in pig barns during the growing-finishing stage of pigs. The dataset included five key input biophysical variables: feed intake (FI), pig mass (MP), carbon dioxide (CO2) levels, temperature (T), and relative humidity (RH). Data was collected from three experimental pig barns during 2022 and 2023 to train and test the machine learning models. Among the three machine learning models, the RFR consistently outperformed both MLR and XGB in predicting CH4 concentrations. The results demonstrated better performance by the RFR model in testing (R2 > 0.81), with improvements in R2 of up to 1.92% and 10.46%, as well as decreases in RMSE of up to 5.74% and 20.51%, compared to the XGB and MLR across the three input datasets. In terms of stability, MLR exhibited the maximum stability, followed by RFR and XGB. Sensitivity analysis found FI to be the most influential input variable for CH4 concentration prediction, with the impact ranking being FI > MP > CO2 > T > RH. This study emphasized the potential of machine learning models, particularly RFR, in predicting CH4 concentrations using relevant input variables. These findings enhance understanding of CH4 concentration, providing useful insights into pig production and environmental management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用生物物理数据预测猪舍甲烷浓度的机器学习模型应用
由于甲烷(CH4)浓度对生猪和农场工人的环境影响,因此预测其浓度对养猪业很重要。本研究利用机器学习算法,特别是多元线性回归(MLR)、XGBoost回归(XGB)和随机森林回归(RFR)来预测猪生长-肥育阶段猪舍内CH4浓度。该数据集包括5个关键输入生物物理变量:采食量(FI)、猪体质量(MP)、二氧化碳(CO2)水平、温度(T)和相对湿度(RH)。在2022年和2023年期间,从三个实验猪舍收集数据,以训练和测试机器学习模型。在三种机器学习模型中,RFR在预测CH4浓度方面始终优于MLR和XGB。结果表明,RFR模型在测试(R2 >;0.81),与三个输入数据集的XGB和MLR相比,R2提高了1.92%和10.46%,RMSE降低了5.74%和20.51%。稳定性方面,MLR表现出最大的稳定性,其次是RFR和XGB。敏感性分析发现,FI是影响CH4浓度预测的最大输入变量,影响排序为FI >; MP > CO2 >;T比;RH。本研究强调了机器学习模型,特别是RFR,在使用相关输入变量预测CH4浓度方面的潜力。这些发现增强了对CH4浓度的理解,为养猪生产和环境管理提供了有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Machine Learning-Guided Prediction and Interpretation of Rhodamine B Removal by Biochar Derived from Marine Biomass Potential Application of NADPH-Dependent FMN Reductase-Harboring Delftia Acidovorans in Laboratory-Scale Textile Wastewater Treatment and Re-Use A Comprehensive Study on Radiation-Assisted Detoxification of Hazardous Industrial Effluents: A Statistical Approach Foraging Habit Determines the Amount of Microplastics Ingested in Five Fish Species from a Northern Adriatic Lagoon Impact of Hydraulic Retention Time on a Novel Single-Chamber Aerobic Granular Sludge Continuous-Flow Reactor Treating Wastewater: Physicochemical and Microbial Characterisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1