Return to Work After Medical Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.001
Jan Mathis Elling PhD , Nadine Sänger MSc , Betje Schwarz DrPH , Nico Seifert MA , Christian Hetzel PhD
{"title":"Return to Work After Medical Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Jan Mathis Elling PhD ,&nbsp;Nadine Sänger MSc ,&nbsp;Betje Schwarz DrPH ,&nbsp;Nico Seifert MA ,&nbsp;Christian Hetzel PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe and explain the effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and its related measures on return to work (RTW) outcomes after multimodal medical rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Three cohorts: reference (rehabilitation and RTW prepandemic), pandemic 1 (rehabilitation prepandemic, RTW during pandemic), and pandemic 2 (rehabilitation and RTW during pandemic).</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Individuals who underwent multimodal medical rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders through the German Pension Insurance system between January 2018 and December 2021 (N=688,127).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>A successful and stable RTW was operationalized as having employment subject to social insurance contributions from 9 to 12 months after rehabilitation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Descriptive analysis revealed an RTW rate of 67.2% in the reference cohort, a slight decline in pandemic cohort 1 (66.3%), and a more pronounced decrease in pandemic cohort 2 (63.1%). In contrast, average marginal predictions from a logistic model including various covariates showed that both pandemic cohorts (63.8% and 64.4%) exhibited similarly reduced predicted probabilities of RTW compared with the reference cohort (66.5%). Individuals with sick leave durations exceeding 6 months, compared with those with shorter sick leaves, were more negatively affected by pandemic cohort 1; however, this effect recovered in pandemic cohort 2. The interaction between cohort and income did not show any amplifying effect of the pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The logistic model revealed no differences in predicted probabilities of RTW between pandemic cohort 2 and pandemic cohort 1, suggesting that orthopedic rehabilitation remained robust in maintaining RTW outcomes despite pandemic-related challenges. The findings offer mixed evidence regarding the question of whether the pandemic amplified preexisting barriers to RTW.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"106 11","pages":"Pages 1685-1693"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999325006276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To describe and explain the effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and its related measures on return to work (RTW) outcomes after multimodal medical rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Three cohorts: reference (rehabilitation and RTW prepandemic), pandemic 1 (rehabilitation prepandemic, RTW during pandemic), and pandemic 2 (rehabilitation and RTW during pandemic).

Participants

Individuals who underwent multimodal medical rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders through the German Pension Insurance system between January 2018 and December 2021 (N=688,127).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

A successful and stable RTW was operationalized as having employment subject to social insurance contributions from 9 to 12 months after rehabilitation.

Results

Descriptive analysis revealed an RTW rate of 67.2% in the reference cohort, a slight decline in pandemic cohort 1 (66.3%), and a more pronounced decrease in pandemic cohort 2 (63.1%). In contrast, average marginal predictions from a logistic model including various covariates showed that both pandemic cohorts (63.8% and 64.4%) exhibited similarly reduced predicted probabilities of RTW compared with the reference cohort (66.5%). Individuals with sick leave durations exceeding 6 months, compared with those with shorter sick leaves, were more negatively affected by pandemic cohort 1; however, this effect recovered in pandemic cohort 2. The interaction between cohort and income did not show any amplifying effect of the pandemic.

Conclusions

The logistic model revealed no differences in predicted probabilities of RTW between pandemic cohort 2 and pandemic cohort 1, suggesting that orthopedic rehabilitation remained robust in maintaining RTW outcomes despite pandemic-related challenges. The findings offer mixed evidence regarding the question of whether the pandemic amplified preexisting barriers to RTW.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行时期肌肉骨骼疾病医学康复后重返工作岗位:一项回顾性队列研究
目的描述并解释COVID-19大流行及其相关措施对肌肉骨骼疾病多模式医疗康复后重返工作岗位(RTW)结果的影响:设计:回顾性队列研究:三个队列:参考队列(大流行前的康复和复工)、大流行 1 队列(大流行前的康复、大流行期间的复工)、大流行 2 队列(大流行期间的康复和复工):主要结果测量:主要结果测量指标:成功和稳定的复工是指在康复后的第九个月至第十二个月有工作并缴纳社会保险费:描述性分析显示,参照队列的复工率为 67.2%,大流行队列 1 的复工率略有下降(66.3%),大流行队列 2 的复工率下降更为明显(63.1%)。与此相反,包含各种协变量的逻辑模型的平均边际预测结果显示,与参照队列(66.5%)相比,两个大流行队列(63.8%、64.4%)的预测复工概率都有类似的下降。与病假时间较短的人相比,病假时间超过 6 个月的人受到大流行组群 1 的负面影响更大;然而,这种影响在大流行组群 2 中有所恢复。队列与收入之间的交互作用并未显示出大流行的任何放大效应:逻辑模型显示,大流行组群 2 与大流行组群 1 之间的预测 RTW 概率没有差异,这表明尽管存在与大流行相关的挑战,矫形康复在维持 RTW 结果方面仍然很稳健。对于大流行是否扩大了原有的复健障碍这一问题,研究结果提供了不同的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Patients' and physiotherapists' perspectives on group-based interventions: a mixed systematic review. The dose-response relationship between gait training dose and gait independence in individuals with hemiparetic stroke. User-Complexity and Decision-Making in Upper Limb Prosthetic Device Selection: Discrete Choice Measurement Tool Development. Impact of Right Cerebellar Theta Burst Stimulation on Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1